Abstract
Purpose
The construction of riparian buffer strips has become increasingly important due to the effective phosphorus (P) retention of the strips, thus preventing eutrophication in freshwater ecosystems. The key mechanism is P sorption in soils. To provide some suggestions for increasing the sorption ability of P, the relationships between P sorption behavior and both land use patterns and distance from the shoreline were determined.
Materials and methods
In April, July, and October 2013, field investigations were carried out along the shoreline of Lake Chaohu. Eleven sections, including 36 sampling sites at different distances from the shoreline, were chosen, and these sections contained different types of riparian buffer strips, such as grassland, farmland, forest, wetland, and forest/grassland. The P species, sorption parameters, and dominant vegetation species were analyzed.
Results and discussion
The total P (TP) and P sorption maximum (Qmax) showed no recognizable seasonal variation and were closely correlated with the distance from the shoreline. The further the distance from the shoreline, the higher the TP and Qmax values, suggesting that soil traits could determine the P sorption extent. However, the Olsen-P content and equilibrium P concentration (EPC0) fluctuated greatly, with the peak occurring in spring and the minimum occurring in summer in the majority of the sampling sites. In addition, positive relationships existed between the TP content and the Qmax value as well as the Olsen-P content and the EPC0 value. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) further showed that the Olsen-P content and EPC0 values were closely related to the dominant vegetation species, indicating that land use patterns played a decisive role in regulating the P sorption strength and the level of available P.
Conclusions
To effectively adsorb P (increase Qmax) and prevent P leaching (reduce the EPC0), we recommend changing the land use patterns (more constructed wetlands and forests with grass) in riparian buffers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen DS, Helmers MJ, Burns RT (2015) Phosphorus sorption capacity of six Iowa soils before and after five years of use as vegetative treatment areas. Appl Eng Agric 31(4):611–620
Brian M, Hickey C, Doran B (2004) A review of the efficiency of buffer strips for the maintenance and enhancement of riparian ecosystems. Water Qual Res J Can 39(3):311–317
De LS, Glanville HC, Marshall MR, Prysor AW, Jones DL (2018) Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 624:807–819
Debicka M, Kocowicz A, Weber J, Jamroz E (2016) Organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption in sandy soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(6):840–855
Ding Z, Peng H, Gao S (2011) Analysis and suggestion of soil location monitoring data in Chaohu City. Anhui Agri Sci Bull 17(13):105–107
Giesler R, Andersson T, Lövgren L, Persson P (2005) Phosphate sorption in aluminum- and iron-rich humus soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:77–86
Hoffmann CC, Kjaergaard C, Uusi-Kämppä J, Hansen HC, Kronvang B (2009) Phosphorus retention in riparian buffers: review of their efficiency. J Environ Qual 38(5):1942–1955
Istvanovics V (1994) Fractional composition, adsorption and release of sediment phosphorus in the Kis-Balaton reservoir. Water Res 28(3):717–726
Izydorczyk K, Michalska-Hejduk D, Jarosiewicz P, Bydałek F, Frątczak W (2018) Extensive grasslands as an effective measure for nitrate and phosphate reduction from highly polluted subsurface flow-case studies from Central Poland. Agr Water Manage 203:240–250
Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizospere – a critical review. Plant Soil 205(1):25–44
Kaoru A, Yasuo O (1998) Comparison of useful terrestrial and aquatic plant species for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from domestic wastewater. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 44(4):599–607
Kelly JM, Kovar JL, Sokolowsky R, Moorman TB (2007) Phosphorus uptake during four years by different vegetative cover types in a riparian buffer. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78(3):239–251
Kronvang B, Bechman M, Lundekvam H, Behrendt H, Rubæk GH, Schoumans OF, Syversen N, Andersen HE, Hoffmann CC (2005) Phosphorus losses from agricultural areas in river basins: effects and uncertainties of targeted mitigation measures. J Environ Qual 34:2129–2144
Kyehan L, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC, Mickelson SK (2000) Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. J Environ Qual 29(4):1200–1205
Li M, Hou YL, Zhu B (2007) Phosphorus sorption-desorption by purple soils of China in relation to their properties. Aust J Soil Res 45:182–189
Mankin KR, Ngandu DM, Barden CJ, Hutchinson SL, Geyer WA (2007) Grass-shrub riparian buffer removal of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from simulated runoff. J Am Water Resour As 43(5):1108–1116
Moon J, Jung Y, Lee T, Kim TC, Rho P, Shin YC, Ryu J, Lim KJ (2013) Determining the effective width of riparian buffers in Korean watersheds using the swat model. Environ Eng Manag J 12(11):2249–2260
Moradi N, Sadaghiani MHR, Sepehr E (2012) Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on phosphorus sorption characteristics in some calcareous soils. Turk J Agric For 36(4):459–468
Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. In: USDA circular. USDA, Washington DC, p 939
Saunders WMH, Williams EG (1955) Observations on the determination of total organic phosphorus in soils. J Soil Sci 6:254–267
Schreeg LA, Mack MC, Turner BL (2013) Leaf litter inputs decrease phosphate sorption in a strongly weathered tropical soil over two time scales. Biogeochemistry 113:507–524
Shang GP, Shang JC (2005) Causes and control countermeasures of eutrophication in Chaohu Lake, China. Chin Geogr Sci 15:348–354
Shen C, Liao Q, Bootsma HA, Troy CD, Cannon D (2018) Regulation of plankton and nutrient dynamics by profundal quagga mussels in Lake Michigan: a one-dimensional model. Hydrobiologia 815(1):47–63
Stutter MI, Langan SJ, Lunsdom DG (2009) Vegetated buffer strips can lead to increased release of phosphorus to waters: a biogeochemical assessment of the mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 43:1858–1863
Subramaniam V, Singh BR (1997) Phosphorus supplying capacity of heavily fertilized soils .1. Phosphorus adsorption characteristics and phosphorus fractionation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47:115–122
Syversen N (2005) Effect and design of buffer zones in the Nordic climate: the influence of width, amount of surface runoff, seasonal variation and vegetation type on retention efficiency for nutrient and particle runoff. Ecol Eng 24:483–490
Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer power, Ithaca, N.Y., USA
Wang X, Chang L, Li H, Zhang Q (2011) Study on community characteristics and soil properties of typical vegetations in Chaohu hill region. Soils 43(6):981–986
Wang XY, Zhang LP, Zhang FF, Zhang HS, Mei DL (2013) Phosphorus adsorption by soils from four land use patterns. Asian J Chem 25(1):282–286
Wang YZ, Whalen JK, Chen X, Cao YH, Huang B, Lu CY, Shi Y (2016) Mechanisms for altering phosphorus sorption characteristics induced by organic acids. Can J Soil Sci 96:289–298
Weissteiner CJ, Bouraoui F, Aloe A (2013) Reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European rivers by riparian buffer zones. Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 408:08
Xiao WJ, Song CL, Cao XY, Zhou YY (2012) Effects of air-drying on phosphorus sorption in shallow lake sediment, China. Fresenius Environ Bull 21(3A):672–678
Xu MQ, Cao H, Xie P, Deng DG, Feng WS, Xu H (2005) The temporal and spatial distribution, composition and abundance of Protozoa in Chaohu Lake, China: relationship with eutrophication. Eur J Protistol 41:183–192
Yang GR, Hao XY, Li CL, Li YM (2014) Effect of land use on soil phosphorus sorption-desorption under intensive agricultural practices in plastic-film greenhouses. Pedosphere 24(3):367–377
Zak D, Kronvang B, Carstensen MV, Hoffmann CC, Kjeldgaard A, Larsen SE, Audet J, Egemose S, Jorgensen CA, Feuerbach P, Gertz F, Jensen HS (2018) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff in integrated buffer zones. Environ Sci Technol 52:6508–6517
Zhang W, Faulkner JW, Giri SK, Geohring LD, Steenhuis TS (2010a) Effect of soil reduction on phosphorus sorption of an organic-rich silt loam. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:240–249
Zhang X, Liu X, Zhang M, Dahlgren RA, Eitzel M (2010b) Review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual 39(1):76–84
Zhou C, Zhou Y, Chen X, Liu Y, Cao X, Song C (2011) Linkage between land use patterns and sediment phosphorus sorption behaviors along shoreline of a Chinese large shallow lake (Lake Chaohu). Knowl Manag Aquat Ec 34(403):81–85
Zhou H, Gao C (2011) Assessing the risk of phosphorus loss and identifying critical source areas in the Chaohu Lake watershed, China. Environ Manag 48(5):1033–1043
Zhou M, Li Y (2002) Phosphorus-sorption characteristics of calcareous soils and limestone from the southern Everglades and adjacent farmlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1404–1412
Acknowledgments
We thank Siyang Wang, Zijun Zhou, Jian Xiao, and Yao Zhang for their help with sampling.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877381; 41573110; 41611540341), the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2017ZX07603), and the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology (2016FBZ07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zhenli He
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, X., Chen, X., Song, C. et al. Comparison of phosphorus sorption characteristics in the soils of riparian buffer strips with different land use patterns and distances from the shoreline around Lake Chaohu. J Soils Sediments 19, 2322–2329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02232-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02232-z