Labile organic carbon fractions and carbon pool management index in a 3-year field study with biochar amendment
- 197 Downloads
The aims of this research were to (i) systematically investigate the soil organic carbon (SOC) and labile SOC fraction dynamics over a period of 3 years under biochar amendment, (ii) reveal the relations of labile SOC fractions to SOC, and (iii) evaluate the sensitivity of SOC to biochar added at different rates by determining C pool management index (CPMI).
Materials and methods
The SOC, labile SOC fractions, and the CPMI in the 0–20-cm layer were analyzed via a 3-year field experiment of maize. Four biochar treatments were studied, with application rates of 0, 15.75, 31.5, and 47.25 t ha−1 (CK, BC1, BC2, and BC3, respectively). Biochar was applied manually before sowing only in the first year of this experiment; an equal mineral NPK fertilizer was applied to each treatment annually.
Results and discussion
The average data of this 3-year field study demonstrated that biochar incorporation significantly increased SOC, particulate organic carbon (POC), easily oxidizable carbon (EOC), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) by 31.75–83.62, 92.72–323.30, 29.90–51.55, 194.30–437.37, and 31.13–93.12%, respectively, compared to the control; their concentrations increased with increasing biochar addition rates, except for MBC. In addition, EOC, POC, and LFOC were significantly positively related with SOC. Compared to the control, the DOC contents were reduced after biochar addition, but the specific reasons for this finding need to be further studied.
Biochar incorporation could not only significantly improve the soil quality via increasing the soil organic C fractions, but also increase C sequestration rates in the long term by increasing the non-labile C pool (NLC). The CPMI could be used as a representative index in evaluating the impacts of biochar on SOC content and soil quality.
KeywordsBiochar C pool management index C sequestration Labile organic carbon fractions
This study was funded by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (No. 201503136 and No. 201303095), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41401325), Program for Science and technology plan of Shenyang (17-182-9-00). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments to improve the manuscript.
- An T, Schaeffer S, Li S, Fu S, Pei J, Li H, Zhuang J, Radosevich M, Wang J (2015) Carbon fluxes from plants to soil and dynamics of microbial immobilization under plastic film mulching and fertilizer application using 13C pulse-labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 80:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Camberdella CA, Elliott ET (1992) Particulate soil organic matter across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56(3):777–783. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Downie A, Munrow P, Crosky A (2009) Characteristics of biochar physical andstructural properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmentalmanagement: science and technology, Earthscan, London, pp 13–29Google Scholar
- Gregorich EG, Janzen HH (1996) Storage of soil carbon in the light fraction and macroorganic matter. In: Carter MR, Stewart BA (eds) Advances in soil science. Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 167–190Google Scholar
- Kundu S, Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Ghosh V, Gupta HS (2007) Carbon sequestrationand relationship between carbon addition and storage under rainfed soybean-wheat rotation in a sandy loam soil of Indian Himalayas. Soil Till Res 92(1-2):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: anintroduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmentalmanagement: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- Morrissey EM, Berrier DJ, Neubauer SC, Franklin RB (2014) Using microbial communities and extracellular enzymes to link soil organic matter characteristics to greenhouse gas production in a tidal freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry 117(2-3):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9894-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shang J, Geng ZC, Chen XX, Zhao J, Geng R, Wang S (2015) Effects of biochar on soil organic carbon and nitrogen and their fractions in a Rainfed farmland. J Agro-EnvironSci 34(3):509–517Google Scholar
- Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Makela P, Stoddard FL, Alakukku L, Helenius J (2014) Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in borealconditions: effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat,turnip rape and faba bean. Plant Soil 374(1-2):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1851-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Liu S, Li S (2006) Effect of long-term plastic film mulching and fertilizationon inorganic N distribution and organic N mineralization in brownearth. J Soil Water Conserv 20:107–110Google Scholar
- Yang X, Lan Y, Meng J, Chen WF, Huang YW, Cheng XY, He TY, Cao T, Liu ZQ, Jiang LL, Gao JP (2017b) Effects of maize stover and its derived biochar on greenhouse gases emissions and C-budget of brown earth in Northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(9):8200–8209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8500-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar