Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 2410–2417 | Cite as

Regional specificity of radionuclide fixation in river basins due to soil petrology and mineralogy

  • Nataliya Chizhikova
  • Elena Korobova
  • Vitaly Linnik
  • Ekaterina Chechetko
Reclamation and Management of Polluted Soils: Options and Case Studies

Abstract

Purpose

The main goal of this research was to compare and reveal the difference in the character of Cs-137 distribution and fixation in fine fractions of alluvial soils formed by the rivers draining areas of different geochemical origin with the corresponding mineral composition of clay fraction and to discuss the results in light of possible ecological perspectives.

Materials and methods

Alluvial soil samples were collected in the Yenisey (Central Siberia) and Iput (the East European Plain) river basin areas contaminated by 137Cs. Granulometric fine fractions (>0.01, 0.01–0.005, 0.005–0.001, <0,001 mm) were obtained by pipette technique; clay minerals were determined by a universal Carl-Zeiss Jena X-ray diffractometer (Germany); and 137Cs activity was measured by a CANBERRA gamma spectrometer with HPGe detector (USA).

Results and discussion

Clay mineralogy demonstrated regional specificity of its composition due to different origins of the soil-forming rocks. Clay fraction of alluvial soil samples collected in the Yenisey river floodplain consists mainly of chlorite-vermiculite and chlorite-smectite interstratifications while in the Iput river basin it is mainly composed of hydromicas and mica-smectite interstratifications. We infer that this may result in a higher potential ability of clay fraction for the radionuclide exchange and release in the former region.

Conclusions

Specificity of local clay minerals as radionuclide sorbents should be of particular ecological concern in relation to long-term exchange processes and involvement of the radioisotope in local biogeochemical cycles including its transfer to food chains. The phenomenon is considered in light of the developed scientific field inaugurated as petro-mineralogical ecology and needs further investigation.

Keywords

Chlorite Ecological rating of clay minerals Mica Petro-mineralogical ecology Radiocesium Smectites Vermiculite 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Field work and soil sampling were performed and samples partly analyzed in the framework of the International INCO-Copernicus projects SPARTACUS and STREAM.

References

  1. Abrahams PW, Steigmajer J (2003) Soil ingestion by sheep grazing the metal enriched floodplain soils of Mid-Wales. Environ Geochem Hlth 25(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bostick BC, Vairavamurthy MA, Karthikeyan KG, Chorover J (2002) Cesium adsorption on clay minerals: an EXAFS spectroscopic investigation. Environ Sci Technol 36:2670–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown G (ed) (1965) X-ray methods of investigation and the structure of clay minerals. Mir, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown J, Wright S, Linnik V (eds) (2002) Source development and transport of radioactive contamination in the environment through the use of satellite imagery. Final Report (01.03.99-01.06.02). Project ERB IC-15-CT-98-0219 in the EC’s Inco-Copernicus Programme (IVth Framework) Osteras, NRPAGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulatov VI (1996) Radioactive Russia. TSERIS, Novosibirsk (in Russian) Google Scholar
  6. Chang KP, Hsu CN (1993) Basic study of 137Cs sorption on soil. J Nucl Sci Technol 30(12):1243–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chernyakhovsky AG, Chizhikova NP, Gradusov BP (1998) Petrographic-mineralogical orders of zonal ecosystems. In: Hölzel (ed) Resources and environment world atlas. Part II. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Austrian Institute of East and Southeast European Studies, Vienna, p 98Google Scholar
  8. Chesnokov AV, Fedin VI, Govorun AP, Ivanov OP, Liksonov VI, Potapov VN, Smirnov SV, Shcherbak SB, Urutskoev LI (1997) Collimated detector technique for measuring a 137Cs deposit in soil under a clean protected layer. Appl Radiat Isotopes 48(9):1265–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chizhikova NP (1992) Transformation of soil mineralogy due to agrogenetic impact dissertation. Dokuchaev Institute for Soil Science, Moscow 648 p Google Scholar
  10. Comans RNJ, Hocley DE (1991) Kinetics of cesium sorption on illite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:1157–1164Google Scholar
  11. Comans RNJ, Haller M, De Peter P (1991) Sorption of cesium on illite: non-equilibrium behaviour and reversibility. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornell RV (1993) Adsorption of cesium on minerals: a review. J Anal Nuclear Chem 171(2):483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Koning A, Comans RNJ (2004) Reversibility of radiocaesium sorption on illite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68(13):2815–2823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Koning A, Geelhoed-Bonouvrie PA, Comans RNJ (2000) Comparing in situ distribution coefficients and exchangeability of radiocaesium in freshwater sediments with laboratory predictions. Sci Total Environ 257:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dzene L, Tertre E, Hubert F, Ferrage E (2015) Nature of the sites involved in the process of cesium desorption from vermiculite. J Colloid Interf Sci 455:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Facchinelli A, Luigi G, Elisabetta B, Mauro M, Andrew SH (2001) The influence of clay mineralogy on the mobility of radiocaesium in upland soils of NW Italy. J Environ Radioactiv 56:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorbunov NI (1971) Technique for soil preparation for mineralogical analysis. In: Gorbunov NI (ed) Methods of mineralogical and macromorphological soil study. AN SSSR, Moscow, pp 5–15 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  18. Gradusov BP, Chernyakhovsky AG, Chizhikova NP (1990a) Lithological, petrographic and mineralogical peculiarities of the edaphic component in ecosystems of the Pacific Ocean basin. In: Problems of soil science. Soviet soil scientists at the XVI international soil science congress. Nauka, Moscow, pp 223–229 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. Gradusov BP, Chernyakhovsky AG, Chizhikova NP (1990b) Ecological petrography and mineralogy of soil. In: Transactions “Problems of soil science in Siberia”. Akademiya nauk SSSR, Sibirskoye otdelenie, Institut pochvovedeniya I agrokhimii, pp 13–34 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. Hird AB, Rimmer DL, Livens FR (1996) Factors affecting the sorption and fixation of caesium in acid organic soil. Eur J Soil Sci 47(1):97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konoplev AV, Konopleva IV (1999) Determination of the characteristics of equilibrium selective sorption of radiocesium by soils and bottom deposits. Geochem Int 2:207–214 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  22. Konoplev AV, Borzilov VA, Bobovnikova TI, Virchenko YP, Popov VE, Kutnyakov IV, Chumichev VB (1988) Distribution of radionuclides in fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear power station accident in the soil-water system. Meteorol Gidrol 12:63–74 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  23. Konoplev AV, Hilton J, Comans R et al (1993) Migration and transformation of chemical forms of the Chernobyl Cs-137 in soil-water system at different distances from the sources In: Proceedings of XV Mendeleev congress on general and applied chemistry, Obninsk, 1:58Google Scholar
  24. Korobova EM, Chizhikova NP (2007) Distribution and mobility of radiocesium in relation to the clay fraction mineralogy and soil properties in the Iput’ river floodplain. Eurasian Soil Sci 10:1190–1204 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  25. Korobova EM, Chizhikova NP, Volosov AG (2005) Fine particle control of radiocesium accumulation in contaminated flood plain soils In: Abstracts of the 2nd Int. Meeting clay in natural & engineered barriers for radioactive waste confinement. Andra, Tours, pp 613–614Google Scholar
  26. Korobova E, Linnik V, Chizhikova N (2008) The history of the Chernobyl 137Cs contamination of the flood plain soils and its relation to physical and chemical properties of the soil horizons (a case study). J Geochem Explor 96(2–3):236–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korobova EM, Linnik VG, Chizhikova NP, Alekseeva TN, Shkinev VM, Brown J, Dinu MI (2014) Granulometric and mineralogic investigation for explanation of radionuclide accumulation in different size fractions of the Yenisey floodplain soils. J Geochem Explor 142:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linnik VG (2008) Landscape differentiation of technogenic radionuclides: geoinformation systems and models Doctoral dissertation thesis in geography. Moscow State University, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. Linnik V, Korobova E, Nosov A, Kuvylin A, Govorun A, Ermakov A, Moiseenko F (1999) Radionuclide distribution within the Buldynka catchment and Iput river floodplain, Russia. In: van der Perk M (ed) SPARTACUS. Spatial redistribution of radionuclides within catchments: development of GIS-based models for decision support systems. Midterm report. Utrecht University, Utrecht, pp 21–31Google Scholar
  30. Nosov AV, Ashanin MV, Ivanov AB et al (1993) Radioactive contamination of the Yenisey river due to discharges of the Krasnoyarsk Mining and Chemical Combine. Atomnaya Energiya 74(2):144–150 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  31. Poinsott C, Baeyens B, Bradbury MH (1999) Experimental and modeling studies of cesium sorption on illite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63(19/20):3217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shcheglov AI (2000) Biogeochemistry of technogenic radionuclides in forest ecosystems. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  33. Sobotovich EV, Olkhovik YUA, Ol’htynsky YU (1991) Protective ability of soil in the regions of radiochemical impact of the Chernobyl accident’ fallout. Atomnaya Energia 70(61):401–402 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  34. Sukhorukov FV, Melgunov MS, Kropacheva MYU, Chuguevsky AV, Solotchin PA (2012) Technogenic radionuclides in the Yenisey left riverside downstream its confluence with the Angara river: relation to mineral composition and alluvium deposition. In: Radioecology of the XXI century. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. North Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, pp 363–374 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  35. Vakulovsky SM (2003) Radioactive contamination of water bodies in the USSR and Russia in 1967–2000. Doctoral dissertation in geoecology (in the form of scientific report). SPA “Typhoon”, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Russian Academy of Agricultural SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Faculty of GeographyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations