Selective effects of forest fires on the structural domains of soil humic acids as shown by dipolar dephasing 13C NMR and graphical-statistical analysis of pyrolysis compounds
Data management strategies of pyrolysis results and NMR acquisition modes were examined in humic acids (HAs) from control soils and fire-affected soils. The information supplied by dipolar dephasing (DD) 13C NMR spectroscopy and Curie-point pyrolysis were used to assess chemical structures hardly recognizable and measurable, or of unclear interpretation, when using 13C NMR under standard acquisition pulses (cross-polarization/magic angle spinning, CPMAS).
Materials and methods
The HAs were isolated from two forest soils under Pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris in control and burned sites affected by medium or severe-intensity wildfires. For NMR analyses, during DD acquisition conditions, a 180° 13C pulse was inserted to minimize phase shifts. Curie-Point pyrolysis was carried out at 510 °C for 5 s, and the pyrolysis fragments were analyzed by GC/MS. The total abundances of the major pyrolysis products were compared by an update of the classical Van Krevelen’s graphical-statistical approach, i.e., as surface density values in the space defined by the compound-specific H/C and O/C atomic ratios.
Results and discussion
The DD 13C NMR experiments displayed significant differences in the HA spectral profiles as regards to the standard CPMAS 13C NMR acquisition conditions, mainly in the chemical shift region of alkyl structures as well as for tannin- or carbohydrate-like O-alkyl structures. In fact, the comparison between DD and CPMAS solid-state NMR suggested shortening of alkyl chains and generation of carbohydrate-derived, unsaturated structures—viz. furans—which adds to the aromatic domain. Pyrolytic results showed fire-induced specific changes in HAs chemical structure and its molecular diversity. The changes were evident in the location and sizes of the different clusters of pyrolysis compounds defined by their atomic ratios.
The DD 13C NMR provided specific information on the fate of aliphatic structures and the origin of unsaturated HA structures, which could be helpful in differentiating “inherited” from “pyrogenic” aromatic structures. This is further confirmed by the analysis of the molecular assemblages of pyrolytic products, which showed accumulation of condensed polyaromatic domains in the HAs after the high-intensity fire, accompanied by a recalcitrant alkyl hydrocarbon domain. Medium-intensity fire led to aromaticity increase due to a selective accumulation of lignin-derived phenols concomitant to the depletion of aliphatic hydrocarbon constituents.
KeywordsCurie-point pyrolysis Dipolar dephasing Forest fires damage levels Humic acid structural changes NMR
The contributions by three anonymous reviewers and the financial support by the Spanish CICyT (grant CGL2013-43845-P) are gratefully acknowledged.
- Alemany LB, Grant DM, Alger TD, Pugmire RJ (1983) Cross polarization and magic angle sample spinning NMR spectra of model organic compounds. 3. Effect of the 13C-1H dipolar interaction on cross polarization and carbon-proton dephasing. J Am Chem Soc 105:6697–6704Google Scholar
- Almendros G, González-Vila FJ (2012) Wildfires, soil carbon balance and resilient organic matter in Mediterranean ecosystems. A review. Spanish J Soil Sci 2:8–33Google Scholar
- Duchaufour P (1987) Manual de Edafología. Masson, Barcelona, p 224Google Scholar
- Hatcher PG (1987) Chemical structural studies of natural lignin by dipolar dephasing solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Org Geochem 11:31–39Google Scholar
- Hatcher PG, Schnitzer M, Vassallo AM, Wilson MA (1989) The chemical structure of highly aromatic humic acids in three volcanic ash soils as determined by dipolar dephasing NMR studies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 53:125–130Google Scholar
- Jiménez-Morillo NT, González-Pérez JA, Jordán A, Zavala LM, de la Rosa JM, Jiménez-González M, González-Vila FJ (2016b) Organic matter fractions controlling soil water repellency in sandy soils from the Doñana national park (SW Spain). Land Degrad Develop 27:1413–1423Google Scholar
- Kögel-Knabner I (1993) Biodegradation and humification processes in forest soils. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 8. Dekker, New York, pp. 101–135Google Scholar
- Monnier G, Turc L, Jeanson-Luusinang C (1962) Une méthode de fractionnement densimétrique par centrifugation des matières organiques du sol. Ann Agron 13:55–63Google Scholar
- Skjemstad JO, Clark P, Golchin A, Oades HM (1997) Characterization of soil organic matter by solid state 13C NMR spectroscopy. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 253–271Google Scholar
- Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry. Genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley, New York, p. 512 ISBN: 978-0-471-59474-1Google Scholar
- Van Krevelen DW (1950) Graphical-statistical method for the study of structure and reaction processes of coal. Fuel 29:269–284Google Scholar
- Wilson MA (1987) NMR techniques and applications in geochemistry and soil chemistry. Pergamon, Oxford, p. 352 ISBN-13:978-0080348520Google Scholar
- WRB (2006) World Reference Base for soil resources 2006. World soil resources reports 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar