Soil organic carbon as a key predictor of N in forest soils of Brazil
- 219 Downloads
Despite the ancillary knowledge that soil N is chiefly retained as soil organic matter, little is known about how it is affected by other soil and environmental factors, especially in the tropics. In this study, we performed a comprehensive survey of soils under native vegetation in Minas Gerais, Brazil, aiming to (a) measure soil Kjeldahl-N concentrations to a 1-m depth, (b) identify the main affecting factors of soil N retention, and (c) predict N through soil profile based on organic C (SOC) and its main conditioning factors.
Materials and methods
Soils under 36 fragments of native forest and savanna were sampled at five depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–100 cm) and characterized by physical and chemical analyses, including total N determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method. Single and multivariate regressions were used to predict N concentrations based on soil properties and climatic factors.
Results and discussion
The average N concentrations ranged between 0.12 and 7.54 g kg−1, decreasing with depth, and can be predicted using SOC concentrations (R 2 = 0.86). Multivariate regressions using more input data, namely texture, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and altitude increased slightly R 2 values (0.68–0.90) for separate soil depths, but not for the whole dataset (R 2 = 0.85).
We demonstrated that N can be adequately predicted based on SOC concentrations, for any depth and forest type. The implications of the stable SOC/N relation and their coupled cycles and the environmental factors affecting N retention in Brazilian weathered soils are further discussed.
KeywordsC and N soil cycles Cerrado Soil texture Pedotransfer functions Tropical forest Weathered Brazilian soils
This research was funded by the CNPq (process 308592/2011-5), Fapemig (process CAG - APQ 00291-11), and Cemig. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Department of Forest Science (Lemaf), Federal University of Lavras, involved in field sampling, processing, preparation and some of laboratory analysis of soil samples. We thank student Henrique J. G. M. Maluf (Federal University of Lavras) for the help with the principal component analysis.
- Baldock JA, Nelson PN (2000) Soil organic matter. In: Summer M (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Barry RG, Chorley RJ (2003) Atmosphere, weather and climate. 8th ed. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Brady NC, Weil RR (2004) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brasil (1992) Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. Departamento Nacional de Meteorologia. Normas Climatológicas: 1961–1990. Mapa, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
- Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 3: chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- Calazans SOL (2014) Nitrogênio do solo sob vegetação native em Minas Gerais: teores, estoques e modelagem. UFLA, LavrasGoogle Scholar
- Cantarella H, Quaggio JÁ, Raij B (2001) Determinação da matéria orgânica. In: Raij B, Andrade JC, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA (eds) Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Instituto Agronômico, Campinas, pp. 173–180Google Scholar
- Feller C, Albrecht A, Tessier D (1996) Aggregation and organic matter storage in kaolinitic and smectitic tropical soils. In: Carter MR, Stewart BA (eds) Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Garten Junior CT et al (1999) Forest soil carbon inventories and dynamics along an elevation gradient in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Biogeochemistry 45:115–145Google Scholar
- Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: Dane JH, Topp C (eds) Methods of soil analysis: physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- Helling CS et al (1964) Contribution of Organic Matter and Clay to Soil Cation-Exchange Capacity as Affected by the pH of the Saturating Solution1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:517--520Google Scholar
- Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biology and Bioch 27:753--760Google Scholar
- Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Black CA (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
- Raij B, Andrade JC, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA (2001) Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Instituto Agronômico, CampinasGoogle Scholar
- Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Seybold CA et al (2005) Predicting Cation Exchange Capacity for Soil Survey Using Linear Models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am J 69:856--863Google Scholar
- Silva CA, Vale FR, Guilherme LRG (1994) Efeito da calagem na mineralização do nitrogênio em solos de Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 18:471–476Google Scholar
- Silva CA, Vale FR, Fernandes LA (1999) Nitrificação em amostras de onze solos de Minas Gerais sob influência da correção da acidez. Revista Ceres 46:457–470Google Scholar
- Sparks DL et al (eds) (1996) Methods of soil analysis: chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wang SQ et al (2004) Vertical distribution of soil organic carbon in China. J Environ Manag 33:200–209Google Scholar
- Wang S et al (2005) Gradient distribution of soil nitrogen and its response to climate change along the Northeast China Transect. Chin J Appl Ecol 16:279–283Google Scholar
- Zinn YL, Lal R, Resck DVS (2005) Texture and organic carbon relations described by a profile pedotransfer function for Brazilian Cerrado soils. Geoderma 127:168–173Google Scholar