Life cycle assessment of aquafeed ingredients
This study performs an exploratory comparative evaluation of various animal and vegetable protein and lipid sources, used as feed in the aquaculture industry. The ingredients studied include fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) from fisheries by-products, meal and fat by-products from poultry slaughter, FM and FO from Peruvian anchovy capture, and soybean meal and oil. The boundaries studied include the production or capture, the ingredient processing unit and the transport to the unit that processes the ingredients into aquafeeds in Portugal.
The LCA impact assessment method is the CML-IA baseline V3.04/EU25 and the results were obtained for the characterisation step. Some of the inventory data were collected from a Portuguese company (Savinor) that processes both by-products from local fisheries and by-products from poultry production. Savinor provided data specifically associated with the ingredients’ production. Obtained data were complemented with literature data from: fish capture and poultry production. Inventory data for the production of ingredients from Peruvian anchovy and soybeans were retrieved from literature. It was assumed that the transport of the ingredients produced from Peruvian anchovy, between Lima and Rotterdam, is made in a transoceanic vessel, and it is considered a transport by truck between Rotterdam and Ovar, for soybean ingredients and FM/FO produced from Peruvian anchovy.
Results and discussion
This paper shows that poultry meal and poultry fat from poultry slaughter by-products have the larger contribution to all environmental impact categories evaluated, being the production of poultry the life cycle stage that contributes most to the overall categories. On the other hand, FM and FO from Peruvian anchovy were the ingredients with a lower contribution to all impact categories, except for abiotic depletion category, for FM from Peruvian anchovy, and abiotic depletion, abiotic depletion (fossil fuels) and ozone layer depletion for FO from Peruvian anchovy. For these categories, soybean meal and oil had lower impacts, respectively. The ingredients were compared by classes (protein and lipid sources).
A general conclusion is that soybean meal and oil and FM/FO from Peruvian anchovy appear to be very interesting options for aquafeeds from an LCA perspective. However, some limitations identified for this study, as, for instance, that it does not account for the environmental benefits associated with the use of the mentioned by-products, that would otherwise be considered wastes (i.e. by-products from the fish canning sector and poultry slaughter) shall be evaluated in future studies.
KeywordsAquafeed ingredients Animal by-products LCA (life cycle assessment) Lipid sources Protein sources Sustainable aquaculture
We acknowledge the Savinor S.A. team for providing us all data needed to carry on this study and the IJUP program that provided the financial support (PP-IJUP2012-SOJA DE PORTUGAL-08).
- Cavadas A (2013) Environmental assessment of seafood consumption patterns in Portugal. Oporto University, PortoGoogle Scholar
- Cavalett O (2008) Análise do Ciclo de Vida da Soja. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CampinasGoogle Scholar
- CML (2017) CML-IA Characterisation factors. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors. Accessed 20 May 2017
- De Cara S, Goussebaïle A, Grateau R, Levert F, Quemener J, Vermont B, Bureau JC, Gabrielle B, Gohin A, Bispo A (2012) Revue critique des études évaluant l’effet des changements d’affectation des sols sur les bilans environnementaux des biocarburants. rapport de l’ADEMEGoogle Scholar
- Duarte CM, Marbá N, Holmer M (2007) Rapid domestication of marine species. Science, publish by AAAS. 316:382–383Google Scholar
- EU CR (2013) (N° 56/2013) amending annexes I and IV to regulation (EC) no 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Off J Eur UnionGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. doi: 978-92-5-107225-7FAO (2014) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. doi: 978–92–5-108275-1Google Scholar
- FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. doi:978–92–5-109185-2Google Scholar
- IEA (2014) Electricity heat in Portugal, available from the International Energy Agency, 2014Google Scholar
- INE (2012) Estatísticas da Pesca 2012. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P. Statistics Portugal, LisboaGoogle Scholar
- Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture feed and application to the turbot sector. Int J Environ Res 6(4):837–848Google Scholar
- Lopes I (2011) Life cycle assessment of chicken. MSc. Master dissertation in environmental engineer. University of Aveiro, Portugal (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
- MapQuest (2017) Official MapQuest http://www.mapquest.com/. Accessed 25 Mar 2017
- Montero D, Robaina L, Caballero MJ, Ginés R, Izquierdo MS (2005) Growth, feed utilization and flesh quality of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed diets containing vegetable oils: a time-course study on the effect of a re-feeding period with a 100% fish oil diet. Aquaculture 248(1–4):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Montero D, Grasso V, Izquierdo MS, Ganga R, Real F, Tort L, Caballero MJ, Acosta F (2008) Total substitution of fish oil by vegetable oils in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) diets: effects on hepatic Mx expression and some immune parameters. Fish Shellfish Immunol 24(2):147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NP EN ISO 14040 (2008) Environmental management, life cycle assessment, principles and framework. International organisation for standardisation (ISO), GeneveGoogle Scholar
- NRC (2011) Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp. The National Academies Press. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/13039
- Rana KJ, Hasan MR (2009) Impact of rising feed ingredient prices on aquafeeds and aquaculture production. FAO - Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. 541. ISBN 978-92-5-106422-1Google Scholar
- Rust MB, Barrows FT, Hardy RW, Lazur A, Naughten K, Silverstein J (2011) The future of aquafeeds NOAA/USDAGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt JH (2015) User manual for the 2.-0 LCA iLUC model (Version 4.1.). In: 2. 0 LCA consultants, Aalborg, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- SeaRates (2017) International container shipping http://www.searates.com/. Accessed 25 Mar 2017