Are we still keeping it “real”? Proposing a revised paradigm for recycling credits in attributional life cycle assessment
- 579 Downloads
End-of-life (EoL) recycling poses a challenge to many practitioners today due to the availability of different calculation approaches and the lack of scientific consensus, which is fueled by academic research and vested industry interests alike. One of the main challenges in EoL modeling is the credible calculation of the appropriate recycling credit in open-loop and closed-loop situations.
We believe that part of the challenge is caused by a lack of understanding of the underlying recycling paradigm, which refers to the meaning that is assigned to the recycling credit. Referred to as “system expansion through substitution” and “future displacement of primary production,” the two predominant paradigms are delineated from each other followed by a discussion of their remaining challenges.
Results and discussion
Based on these considerations, we propose a revised paradigm based on embodied burdens that is able to alleviate many of the most pressing issues associated with material recycling in attributional life cycle assessment.
With this discussion paper, we look forward to a productive and lively debate on the matter.
KeywordsLCA LCI End-of-life Recyling Allocation
- Attanasio A et al (2017) Towards greener concrete: the challenges of SUS-CON project. In: Hordijk D, Luković M (eds) High tech concrete: where technology and engineering meet. Springer, Berlin, pp 2373–2381Google Scholar
- Bohnacker J (1998) Einfluß von Recyclingverfahren auf die umweltliche Produktbilanz. Shaker Verlag, AachenGoogle Scholar
- CEN (2012) EN 15804:2012—sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products. Brussels: European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- Finkbeiner M, Neugebauer S, Berger M (2013) Carbon footprint of recycled biogenic products: the challenge of modelling CO2 removal credits. Int J Sustain Eng 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2012.663414
- ISO (2006a) ISO 14040—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2006b) ISO 14044—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- ISO (2012) ISO/TR 14049—environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- Koffler C, Wang JM (2017) Comment on “Toward estimating displaced primary production from recycling—a case study of U.S. aluminum” by Zink et al. (2017). J Ind Ecol. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12656
- Krinke S, Bossdorf-Zimmer B, Goldmann D (2005) Executive summary—life cycle assessment of end-of-life vehicle treatment. Volkswagen AG, WolfsburgGoogle Scholar
- Lindeijer E (1994) Allocating recycling for integrated chain management: taking account of quality losses. SETAC, BrüsselGoogle Scholar
- Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Revised edition ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Sodersten C-J, Wood R, Hertwich EG (2017) Environmental impacts of capital formation. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12532
- The Quartz Project, 2015. The Quartz Common Products Database. [Online] Available at: http://quartzproject.org/[Accessed 10 July 2017]
- Vadenbo C, Hellweg S, Astrup TF (2016) Let’s be clear(er) about substitution—a reporting framework to account for product displacement in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12519
- Weidema BP (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment, Copenhagen. Danish Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
- Weidema BP (2017) In search of a consistent solution to allocation of joint production. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12571
- Werner F (2002) Treatment of aluminium recycling in LCA—development and evaluation of the value-corrected substitution procedure. EMPA, DuebendorfGoogle Scholar
- Wilts H et al (2016) Benefits of resource efficiency in Germany, Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute worldsteel (2011) Life Cycle Assessment Methodology Report, Brussels: worldsteel associationGoogle Scholar
- worldsteel (2011) Methodology report — Life cycle inventory study for steel products. worldsteel association, Brussels. Available at https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:6a222ba2-e35a-4126-83ab-5ae5a79e6e46/LCA+Methodology+Report.pdf. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2017
- Zink T, Geyer R, Startz R (2017) Toward estimating displaced primary production from recycling—a case study of U.S. aluminum. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12557