Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics — are they consistent?
Background, aim, and scope
During the last decades, the electronics industry has undergone tremendous changes due to intense research leading to advanced technology development. Multiple life cycle assessment (LCA) studies have been performed on the environmental implications of consumer electronics. The aim of this review is to assess the consistency between different LCA studies for desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and televisions (TVs).
Materials and methods
A literature study was conducted covering some key LCA contributions to the consumer electronics field. The focus is primarily on global warming potential during 100 years (GWP100) efficiency in different life cycle phases and secondarily on primary energy usage/electricity usages which are normalised per year to find inconsistencies.
The life cycle impact assessment GWP100 results for consumer electronics over the years suggest that most studies are of comparable quality; however, some studies are neither coherent nor transparent. Published LCAs for mobile phone and TV sets are consistent, whereas for laptop and desktop computers, the studies occasionally give conflicting messages.
The inconsistencies appear to be rooted in subjective choices and different system boundaries and lifetime, rather than lack of standardisation. If included, the amounts of emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) are crucial to the GWP100 in the various life cycle phases for a desktop using liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Another important observation is that the MEEuP methodology report/tool underestimates the GWP100 of electronic component manufacturing processes.
Between 1997 and 2010, the ISO 14040/44 standards have ensured a rather consistent set of GWP100 results for the studied products. However, the lack of transparency for consumer electronics LCAs sometimes makes benchmarking difficult. It is nevertheless possible to compare new LCA calculations to existing studies. It is also possible to reveal which product studies are consistent with studies of submaterials and subcomponents. In most cases, the GWP100 results for consumer electronics are consistent. Based on the survey of published work, recycling and other end-of-life processes have a tiny share of the total GWP100 score for consumer electronics.
Recommendations and perspectives
LCA researchers should as a rule, if possible, make a historical survey of their technical system to establish trends, proportions and relations. Policy makers ought to ask for these surveys when using LCAs for decision support. This charter is necessary as to understand the reasonableness of the results. Additions to the ISO14040/44 LCA standardisation for mass–volume products would be worthwhile as a means of increasing the consistency.
KeywordsConsistency Consumer electronics GWP100 results Life cycle assessment Life cycle inventory
- Alonso JC, Rodrigo J, Castells F (2003) Design for environment of electrical and electronic automotive components based on life cycle assessment. Gate to EHS, March 17:1–7Google Scholar
- Aoe T (2003) Case study for calculation of factor x (eco-efficiency) — comparing CRT TV, PDP TV and LCD TV. Proc. 3rd int symp env conscious design inverse man, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 11–13, pp 650–655Google Scholar
- Apple (2009) iMac Environmental report, March 3, 2009Google Scholar
- Atlantic Consulting and IPU (1998) LCA study of the product group personal computers in the EU eco-label scheme. LCA study (version 1.2). EU eco-labels for personal computers, Atlantic Consulting and IPUGoogle Scholar
- Bergelin F (2008) Life cycle assessment of a mobile phone — a model on manufacturing, using, and recycling. Master thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Confidential (2009) LCA of HSDPA phoneGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008a) Name in db: laptop computer, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008b) Name in db: use, computer, laptop, office use/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008c) Name in db: disposal, laptop computer, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008d) Name in db: desktop computer, without screen, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008e) Name in db: CRT screen, 17 inches, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008f) Name in db: keyboard, standard version, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008g) Name in db: mouse device, optical, with cable, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008h) Name in db: use, computer, desktop, with CRT monitor, office use/RER UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008i) Name in db: disposal, mouse device, optical, with cable, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008j) Name in db: disposal, keyboard, standard version, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008k) Name in db: disposal, desktop computer, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008l) Name in db: disposal, CRT screen, 17 inches, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008m) Name in db: LCD flat screen, 17 inches, at plant/GLO UGoogle Scholar
- Ecoinvent database (2008n) Name in db: disposal, LCD flat screen, 17 inches, to WEEE treatment/CH UGoogle Scholar
- European Commission (2005) MEEuP methodology reportGoogle Scholar
- Gurauskiene I, Varzinskas V (2006) Eco-design methodology for electrical and electronic equipment industry. Environ Res Eng Manag 3:43–51Google Scholar
- Huawei Technologies (2009) Internal calculations in SimaPro 7 of printed board assemblies.Google Scholar
- IVF (2007a) European Commission DG TREN Preparatory studies for eco-design requirements ofEuPs. IVF Report 07004. Laptop used in office. Table 91Google Scholar
- IVF (2007b) European Commission DG TREN Preparatory studies for eco-design requirements of EuPs. IVF Report 07004. Desktop with 17” CRT-display used in an office. Table 97Google Scholar
- IVF (2007c) European Commission DG TREN Preparatory studies for eco-design requirements of EuPs. IVF Report 07004. Desktop with 17” LCD-display used in an office. Table 93Google Scholar
- Nokia (2005) Integrated product policy pilot project — Stage I Final report: life cycle environmental issues of mobile phonesGoogle Scholar
- PE International (2008) Environmental footprint of ICT equipment in manufacture, use, and end-of-life. Presentation held at ECOC Brussels, Belgium, Sept 23Google Scholar
- Tekawa M, Miyamoto S, Inaba A (1997) Life cycle assessment; an approach to environmentally friendly PCs. Proc IEEE Int Symp Electron Environ, May 5–7, San Francisco, CA, pp. 125–130Google Scholar
- Yung WKC, Chan HK, So JHT (2009) A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product. J Eng Design (electronic version)Google Scholar