Social Management or Social Governance: a Review of Party and Government Discourse and why it Matters in Understanding Chinese Politics

Abstract

The political report given by Xi Jinping at the 19th National Party Congress in late 2017 introduced the concept of “a social governance model based on co-construction, co-governance, and co-sharing.” This essay explores the use and interpretations of official discourse on governing society since the late 1980s to understand what is new about this concept. I examine key central documents and scholars’ interpretations of their language in order to analyse the changes in the Party’s stated thinking on governance, and to demonstrate the importance of central document analysis in understanding Chinese politics. I find that the term social governance does not have one clear, static meaning and that to argue otherwise would be misleading. Rather than developing in a linear way, as is often assumed, the concepts used in official discourse are found to be ambiguous and at times contradictory. This plays two important roles. It creates space for scholars to use official discourse as a channel for political participation, while at the same time facilitating the use of official language as technique for governing its users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, in a 1996 speech on managing risks to economic growth Jiang Zemin cited specific issues—urbanization and migrant workers—as increasing the difficulty of “social management.”

  2. 2.

    This does not suggest the distinction between such organizations and government was clear. The plan calls for “filling them out” with “contingencies of government workers.”

  3. 3.

    It is beyond the scope of this paper to expand in detail on the concept of the “broader political atmosphere” but this is also something that can be understood better through analysis of central documents. For example, in the last few years the annual Government Work Report has contained an unprecedented amount of content about following the Party, e.g. the mandate to maintain Four Consciousnesses (四个意识).

  4. 4.

    For example, in some places, to be eligible to take on government contracts a social organization must have a three-star evaluation rating. Without sufficient Party building within the organization, it cannot be granted this rating.

  5. 5.

    To study the Party Constitution and regulations and Xi Jinping’s policy addresses, and to live up to Party standards.

  6. 6.

    To maintain political integrity, think in big-picture terms, follow the leadership core, and stay in alignment. First introduced in 2016 at a meeting of the Central Committee’s Political Bureau.

References

  1. 1.

    Barthes, R., 1994. The Death of the Author. Media Texts, Authors and Readers: A Reader, p.166.

  2. 2.

    Chen, Jiagang [陈家刚]. 2012. The Journey from Social Management to Social Governance. (Cong shehui guanli zouxiang shehui zhili). Xuexi Shibao 22 October.

  3. 3.

    Deng, Xiaoping [邓小平]. 1993. Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping Vol.3. (Deng Xiaoping wenxuan). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

  4. 4.

    Ding, Yuanzhu [丁元竹]. 2018. A Study on Xi Jinping Thought for New Era Socialism with Chinese Characteristics on Social Governance. (Xi Jinping xinshidai zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi shehui zhili sixiang yanjiu). Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance (3).

  5. 5.

    Göbel, Christian, and Thomas Heberer. 2017. The Policy Innovation Imperative: Changing Techniques for Governing China’s Local Governors. In To Govern China: Evolving Practices of Power, ed. Vivienne Shue and Patricia M. Thornton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gow, Michael. 2017. The Core Socialist Values of the Chinese Dream: Towards a Chinese Integral State. Critical Asian Studies 49 (1): 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hu, Jintao [胡锦涛]. 2012. Speech at the Opening of a Seminar for Provincial- and Ministerial-Level Principal Officials. (Zai shengbuji zhuyao lingdaoganbu zhuanti yantaoban kaibanshishang de jianghua). 23 July. http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2012-07-24/064824832089.shtml.

  8. 8.

    Hu, Jintao. 2016. Address at a Meeting to Commemorate the 30th Anniversary of the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Central Committee. (Zai jinian dang de shiyijie sanzhongquanhui zhaokai sanshi zhounian dahui shang de jianghua). 18 December 2008. Selected Works of Hu Jintao Vol 3. (Hu Jintao wenxuan) Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

  9. 9.

    Huang, Weiping [黄卫平]. 2018. Primary-Level Democracy. In Governance Reform in China, ed. Keping Yu, Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

  10. 10.

    Jia, Xijin [贾西津]. 2016. What Changes will the Charity Law Bring? (Cishanfa luodi jiang dailai naxie bianhua?) China Development Brief 31 August. http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/news-18777.html.

  11. 11.

    Jiang, Xiaoping and Chaobing Chen [姜晓萍、陈朝兵]. 2018. Public Services. In Governance Reform in China, ed. Keping Yu. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press 2018.

  12. 12.

    Li, Xiang, Shuqiu Sun, and Wenhe Li [李祥, 孙淑秋, 李文河]. 2015. Fostering and Practicing the Core Socialist Values Whilst Innovating Social Governance. (Zai shehuizhili chuangxin Zhong peiyu he jianxing shehuizhuyi hexinjiazhiguan). Tianshui Xingzheng Xueyuan Xuebao (5) 206–109.

  13. 13.

    Link, Perry. 2013. An Anatomy of Chinese: Rhythm, Metaphor, Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu, Peifeng [刘培峰]. Four Questions that Researchers of Public Interest and Charity Should Pay Attention To. (Gongyi cishan yanjiuzhe yinggai guanzhu de sige wenti). Gongyi cishan xueyuan. July 2018.

  15. 15.

    Liu, Peifeng, Bing Shui, Guosheng Deng, Changshan Ma, Ming Wang and Jianyin Ma [刘培峰、税兵、邓国胜、马长山、王名、马剑银]. 2013.The Thinking Behind Legislating for a Basic Law for Social Organizations. (Shehui zuzhi jibenfa de lifasilu). Zhongguo feiyingli pinglun (2).

  16. 16.

    Ma, Qingyu [马庆钰]. 2018. An Interpretation of the Connotations of the Co-construction, Co-governance, Co-sharing Social Governance Setup. (Gongjian gongzhi gongxiang shehui zhili geju de yihan jiedu). (Gongjian gongzhi gongxiang shehuizhili geju de yihan jiedu). Xingzheng guanli gaige (3).

  17. 17.

    Mertha, Andrew. 2009. ‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly 200: 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schoenhals, Michael. 2007. Demonising Discourse in Mao Zedong’s China: People vs Non-People. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 8: 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shang, Yungang [汤云刚]. 2016. Social Governance and the Guiding Role of the Core Socialist Values. (Shehuizhili chuangxin yu shehuizhuyi hexinjiazhiguan de yinling zuoyong). Nanfang Lunkan (8): 59–61.

  20. 20.

    Shue, Vivienne, and Patricia M. Thornton, eds. 2017. To Govern China: Evolving Practices of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sun, Weilin [孙伟林]. 2011. On the Institutional Transition of the Chinese Social Organization Management System. (Zhongguo shehuizuzhi guanli tizhi bianqian yanjiu). PhD thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing.

  22. 22.

    Sun, Tao [孙涛]. 2015. Using the Development of Social Organizations to Promote Innovation in the Social Governance System. (Yi shehuizuzhi jianshe tuijin shehuizhili tizhi chuangxin xilun). Lilun Daokan (7): 11–15.

  23. 23.

    Tang, Jun [唐钧]. 2015. Social Governance and Separation Between Government and Society. (Shehuizhili yu zhengshefenkai). Dangzheng yanjiu (1):97–101.

  24. 24.

    Thornton, Patricia M. 2007. Disciplining the State: Virtue, Violence, and State-Making in Modern China. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thornton, Patricia M. 2013. The Advance of the Party: Transformation or Takeover of Urban Grassroots Society? The China Quarterly 213 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tong, Zhifeng and Jianxing Yu [童志锋, 郁建兴]. 2011. From Government Paramountcy to Social Paramountcy: A New Analytical Framework for the Changing Social Management Structure. (Cong zhengfubenwei dao shehuibenwei: shehuiguanli tizhi biange de xin fenxi kuangjia). Zhonggong Zhejiang Shengwei Dangxiao Xuebao (1):70–78.

  27. 27.

    Wang, Changjiang [王长江]. 2018. An Exploration of the Interactive Relationship between the Legitimacy and Scientific-ness of the Exercise of Power and Reform. (Zhizheng hefaxing, kexuexing yu gaige hudong guanxi zhi tantao). Dangzheng yanjiu (4).

  28. 28.

    Wang, Ming [王名]. 2013. Proposals from Wang Ming: A Member of CPPCC National Committee (Jianyanzhe shuo: shinian zhengxie ti’an xiaoji). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.  

  29. 29.

    Wang, Ming. 2014. A Proposal on Deepening Innovation of Social Governance and Igniting Social Dynamism (Guanyu quanmian shenhua shehuizhili chuangxin, jifa shehui huoli de jianyian). http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_7579c5bb0101it3v.html 4 March. 

  30. 30.

    Wang, Ming. 2018. The 19th National Party Congress Report’s Systematic View on Social Governance Modernization and a Beautiful Life as a Value Outlook. (Shijiuda baogao guanyu shehuizhili xiandaihua de xitong guandian yu meihaoshenghuo jiazhiguan). Zhongguo xingzheng guanli, March.

  31. 31.

    Wang Ming and Yuxin Lan [王名, 蓝煜昕]. 2014. Social System Reform Strategy Three: Social Governance System Reform. In Wang Ming et al. Social Organizations and Social Governance. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

  32. 32.

    Wang, Ming, Yong Li, Yuxin Lan, Xuqing Chen, Zhou Qiang, Jing Luo, Jian Li, and Chunting Wang [王名, 李勇, 陈旭清, 羌洲, 罗婧, 李健, 王春婷]. 2014. Social Organizations and Social Governance (Shehuizuzhi yu shehuizhili). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

  33. 33.

    Wang, Puqu [王浦劬]. 2014. The Connotations of and Relationship Between National Governance, Government Gonvernance, and Social Governance. (Guojia zhili, zhengfuzhili he shehui zhili de hanyi jiqi xianghu guanxi). Zhongguo xingzheng xueyuan bao (3):11–17.

  34. 34.

    Yan, Jirong [燕继荣]. 2017. China’s Social Governance Theoretical Explorations and Practical Innovations. (Zhongguo shehuizhili de lilun tansuo yu shijian chuangxin). Jiaoxue yu yanjiu (9).

  35. 35.

    Yang, Xuedong [杨雪冬]. 2009. ‘Suffusion-by-Politics’ Methods Won’t Do Us Any Good. (‘Fanzhengzhihua’ shouduan yaobude). Dangdai sheke shiye (6):45.

  36. 36.

    Yang, Xuedong. 2017. Government Governance Innovation in the Context of the Modernization of Governance. (Guojia zhili xiandaihua beijing xia de zhengfu zhili chuangxin). Xuexi Shibao 3 March.

  37. 37.

    Yang, Wenjuan and Xisen Wang [杨文娟, 王锡森]. 2015. Interpreting and Structuring the Relationship between Social Governance and the Core Socialist Values. (Shehuizhili yu shehuizhuyi hexinjiazhiguan guanxi de jiedu he jiangou). Liaoning Xingzheng Xueyuan Xuebao 65–68.

  38. 38.

    Yin, Hongyan [尹鸿雁]. 2014. A theoretical exploration of fostering and practicing core socialist values through social governance. (Zai shehuizhili zhong peiyu he jianxing shehuizhuyi hexinjiazhiguan lilun tanlao). Northern Economy and Trade (12):42–46.

  39. 39.

    Yu, Keping. 2016. A Preference for Scholarship (Pianai xuewen). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yu, Keping, ed. 2018. Governance Reform in China (Zhongguo de zhili bianqian). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhan, Chengfu [詹成付]. 2018. A View of Members of Central Party School Class for Provincial- and Ministerial-Level Officials on Social Governance. (Zhongyang dangxiao shengbuban xueyuan kan shehui zhili).

  42. 42.

    Zheng, Hangsheng [郑杭生]. 2014. ‘Ideal Type’ and Indigenous Features: A Sociological Analysis of Social Governance. (‘Lixiang leixing’ yu bentu tezhi: dui shehui zhili de yizhong shehuixue fenxi). Shehuixue pinglun 2 (3):3–11.

  43. 43.

    Zhou, Hongyun [周红云]. 2016. A Social Governance Setup of All the People Co-Constructing and Co-Sharing: A Theoretical Foundation and Conceptual Framework. (Quanmin gongjian gongxiang de shehuizhili geju:lilun jichu yu gainian kuangjia). Comparative Economic and Social Systems 184(2):123–132.

  44. 44.

     Zhou, Hongyun. 2018. Social Governance. In Governance Reform in China, ed. Keping Yu, 330–363. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. 

  45. 45.

    Zhou, Qingzhi [周庆智]. 2016. Primary-Level Social Self-Governance and the Modern Transformation of Social Governance. (Jiceng shehuizizhi yu shehuizhili xiandai zhuanxing). Zhengzhixue yanjiu (4):70–80.

  46. 46.

    Zou, Chunxia [邹春霞]. 2014. Provincial- and Ministerial-Level Leaders Seminars Have been Held for 15 Years, with Major Issues as Their Focus (Shengbuji lingdao ganbu zhuanti yantaoban yi juban 15nian zhuti wei zhongdawenti) 18 February http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2014/0218/c64387-24390224.html

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Snape.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snape, H. Social Management or Social Governance: a Review of Party and Government Discourse and why it Matters in Understanding Chinese Politics. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 24, 685–699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09605-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social governance
  • Chinese politics
  • Discourse
  • Communist Party of China