Technology-based SMEs develop their activity in changing environments with strong competitive pressures. These conditions make them much more likely to innovate but also make the innovative process more challenging due to greater complexity of decisions about resources and establishment of actions to achieve favorable innovation results. Although prior studies have analyzed diverse factors that impact the innovative dynamics of this type of firm, little advance has been made in exploring the problem from the perspective of decision-making. This study seeks to close this research gap using Effectuation Theory, one of the most-cited theories emerging in the field of entrepreneurship. More specifically, we analyze the use of causal and effectual decision-making logics to evaluate their direct and ambidextrous effects on innovation in technology-based SMEs. Our results provide evidence that not just one path, but rather a pool of alternatives, supports product and process innovation development. More specifically, when technology SMEs pursue product innovation, both effectuation and causation can be used as predominant mechanisms to achieve positive innovation results. If firms also seek to develop process innovations, however, they may obtain better results with an ambidextrous approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
SABI stores economic, financial, operating, human resources, property, and management information on over a million Spanish firms.
Computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) is a survey technique in which interviewers follow script provided by a software application. The software personalizes questionnaire flows based on responses or on information previously collected on the respondent.
Aldrich, H., Auster, E. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior.
Andries, P., Debackere, K., & Van Looy, B. (2013). Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: Business model development under uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(4), 288–310.
Appelhoff, D., Mauer, R., Collewaert, V., & Brettel, M. (2016). The conflict potential of the entrepreneur’s decision-making style in the entrepreneur-investor relationship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 601–623.
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Li, H. (2004). Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 583–597.
Aziz, H., Gao, J., Maropoulos, P., & Cheung, W. (2005). Open standard, open source and peer-to-peer tools and methods for collaborative product development. Computers in Industry, 56(3), 260–271.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.
Baron, R., & Tang, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 49–60.
Berends, H., Jelinek, M., Reymen, I., & Stultiëns, R. (2014). Product innovation processes in small firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 616–635.
Biazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 336–353.
Bourgeois, L., III. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573.
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184.
Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24–40.
Brinckmann, J., Salomo, S., & Gemuenden, H. (2011). Financial management competence of founding teams and growth of new technology-based firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 217–243.
Buganza, T., Gerst, M., & Verganti, R. (2010). Adoption of NPD flexibility practices in new technology-based firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1), 62–80.
Cai, L., Guo, R., Fei, Y., & Liu, Z. (2017). Effectuation, exploratory learning and new venture performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(3), 388–403.
Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103.
Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17.
Chandler, G., DeTienne, D., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390.
De Jong, J. P., & Vermeulen, P. A. (2006). Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A comparison across industries. International Small Business Journal, 24(6), 587–609.
De Jong, J., & Hulsink, W. (2012). Patterns of innovating networking in small firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(3), 280–297.
De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
Delgado-Verde, M., Martín-de Castro, G., & Amores-Salvadó, J. (2016). Intellectual capital and radical innovation: Exploring the quadratic effects in technology-based manufacturing firms. Technovation, 54, 35–47.
Deligianni, I., Voudouris, I., & Lioukas, S. (2017). Do effectuation processes shape the relationship between product diversification and performance in new ventures? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 349–377.
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165–1185.
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(1), 37–59.
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309.
Edwards, T., Delbridge, R., & Munday, M. (2005). Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A process manifest. Technovation, 25(10), 1119–1127.
Eisenhardt, K., Schoonhoven, C. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 504-529.
Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, C. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.
Filippou, D., & King, M. (2011). R&D prospects in the mining and metals industry. Resources Policy, 36(3), 276–284.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Freel, M. (2000). Strategy and structure in innovative manufacturing SMEs: The case of an English region. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 27–45.
Freiling, J. (2008). RBV y the road to the control of external organizations. Management Revue, 33–52.
Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: A literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 59(4), 519–529.
Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 64–81.
Georgsdottir, A., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(3), 166–175.
Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 516–529.
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. (1994). Patterns of generation and adoption of innovation in organizations: Contingency models of innovation attributes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 11(2), 95–116.
Gorkhali, A., & Xu, L. (2016). Enterprise application integration in industrial integration: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 1(04), 1650014.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.
Guo, R. (2018). Strategic decision-making logics, entrepreneurial capability and opportunity exploitation in high-tech new ventures. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(2), 235–252.
Guo, R. (2019). Effectuation, opportunity shaping and innovation strategy in hightech new ventures. Management Decision, 57(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0799.
Guo, R., Cai, L., & Zhang, W. (2016). Effectuation and causation in new internet venture growth: The mediating effect of resource bundling strategy. Internet Research, 26(2), 460–483.
Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., & Zahra, S. (2012). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 217–233.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
Hall, J., & Martin, M. (2005). Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain: A framework for evaluating radical technology development. R&D Management, 35(3), 273–284.
Hall, J., Matos, S., Silvestre, B., & Martin, M. (2011). Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7), 1147–1157.
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden: Blackwell.
Hmieleski, K., & Corbett, A. (2008). The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 482–496.
Hudson, M., Smart, A., & Bourne, M. (2001). Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(8), 1096–1115.
Jaafari, A. (2001). Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: Time for a fundamental shift. International Journal of Project Management, 19(2), 89–101.
Jalonen, H. (2012). The uncertainty of innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1.
Jayaram, J., Oke, A., & Prajogo, D. (2014). The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4424–4439.
Jeffrey Thieme, R., Michael Song, X., & Shin, G. (2003). Project management characteristics and new product survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119.
Jensen, A., & Clausen, T. H. (2017). Origins and emergence of exploration and exploitation capabilities in new technology-based firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 163–175.
Kamuriwo, D., Baden-Fuller, C., & Zhang, J. (2017). Knowledge development approaches and breakthrough innovations in technology-based new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 492–508.
Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319–332.
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.
Lager, T., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Collaborative development of new process technology/equipment in the process industries: In search of enhanced innovation performance. Journal of Business Chemistry, 9(2), 67–84.
Laine, I., & Galkina, T. (2017). The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 905–941.
Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.
Lievens, A., & Moenaert, R. (2000). Project team communication in financial service innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 733–766.
MacCormack, A., Verganti, R., & Iansiti, M. (2001). Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Science, 47(1), 133–150.
Maine, E., Lubik, S., & Garnsey, E. (2012). Process-based vs. product-based innovation: Value creation by nanotech ventures. Technovation, 32(3–4), 179–192.
Matalamäki, M. J. (2017). Effectuation, an emerging theory of entrepreneurship–towards a mature stage of the development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1108_JSBED-2D02-2D2017-2D0030&d=DwIDaQ&c=vh6FgFnduejNhPPD0fl_yRaSfZy8CWbWnIf4XJhSqx8&r=Cmq-n03pNUye_hV18N4x07vilvJxUyMNx0Lvgddl9Ts&m=OxY4WeM4MeY3YpdoNQ1QyQKT5j_otVYSEFwsD5D1QOY&s=ZLHsiJYzZepOQWUPzR0pyeotLmLz93tXol-OZU22M4Y&e=
Mauer, R., Wuebker, R., Schlüter, J., & Brettel, M. (2018). Prediction y control: An agent-based simulation of search processes in the entrepreneurial problem space. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(2), 237–260.
McKelvie, A., Haynie, J., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 273–292.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–235.
Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 318–335.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1–20.
Naveh, E. (2007). Formality and discretion in successful R&D projects. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 110–125.
Nicolaou, N., Lockett, A., Ucbasaran, D., & Rees, G. (2019). Exploring the potential and limits of a neuroscientific approach to entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 37(6), 557–580.
Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., Jokela, P., & Loane, S. (2014). Strategic decision-making of a born global: A comparative study from three small open economies. Management International Review, 54(4), 527–550.
OECD. (2018). The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data: Oslo Manual (4th ed.). Paris: Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators, OECD.
O’Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2005). Innovation in SMEs: The impact of strategic orientation and environmental perceptions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(2), 81–97.
Parida, V., & Örtqvist, D. (2015). Interactive effects of network capability, ICT capability, and financial slack on technology-based small firm innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 278–298.
Parida, V., George, N. M., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). Influence of subjective interpretation, la causación, y la efectuación on initial venture sale. Journal of business Research, 69(11), 4815–4819.
Parida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309.
Perry, J., Chandler, G., & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, N. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
Prajogo, D. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249.
Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C. (2014). Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: Comparing the effects of external and internal factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 521–540.
Prajogo, D., & Sohal, A. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance: The mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.
Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. The Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 45–62.
Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587.
Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Wiltbank, R. (2015). Unreasonable assumptions in ASB. Detail of discussion in Read, Sarasvathy, Dew & Wiltbank (2016). Retrieved from http://www.effectuation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/amr_asb_assumptions_detailed-1.pdf.
Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., & Wiltbank, R. (2016). Respond to arend et al: co-creating effectual entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0180.
Reymen, I. M., Andries, P., Berends, H., Mauer, R., Stephan, U., & Van Burg, E. (2015). Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: A process study of effectuation and causation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 351–379.
Reymen, I., Berends, H., Oudehand, R., & Stultiëns, R. (2017). Decision making for business model development: A process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Management, 47(4), 595–606.
Roach, D., Ryman, J., & Makani, J. (2016). Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 214–238.
Salomo, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285–302.
Sanchez, A. M., & Elola, L. N. (1991). Product innovation management in Spain. Journal of Product Innovation Management: an International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 8(1), 49–56.
Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29(3), 331–350.
Sarasvathy, S., Kumar, K., York, J., & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: Overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 71–93.
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of management studies, 46(5), 864–894. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1111_j.1467-2D6486.2009.00841.x&d=DwIDaQ&c=vh6FgFnduejNhPPD0fl_yRaSfZy8CWbWnIf4XJhSqx8&r=Cmq-n03pNUye_hV18N4x07vilvJxUyMNx0Lvgddl9Ts&m=OxY4WeM4MeY3YpdoNQ1QyQKT5j_otVYSEFwsD5D1QOY&s=iRvKE3LuwRzX4eQ6o2dJpmrjxadsVwc4tDC48QNEs8g&e=
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.
Sitoh, M., Pan, S., & Yu, C. (2014). Business models and tactics in new product creation: The interplay of effectuation and causation processes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(2), 213–224.
Sjödin, D. (2019). Knowledge processing and ecosystem co-creation for process innovation: Managing joint knowledge processing in process innovation projects. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 135–162.
Sjödin, D., Eriksson, P., & Frishammar, J. (2011). Open innovation in process industries: A lifecycle perspective on development of process equipment. International Journal of Technology Management, 56(2/3/4), 225–240.
Sjödin, D., Frishammar, J., & Eriksson, P. (2016). Managing uncertainty and equivocality in joint process development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 39, 13–25.
Smolka, K., Verheul, I., Burmeister-Lamp, K., & Heugens, P. (2018). Get it together! Synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision-making logics on venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(4), 571–604.
Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2018). Slack resources, exploratory and exploitative innovation and the performance of small technology-based firms at incubators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1213–1231.
Sommer, S., Loch, C., & Dong, J. (2009). Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in startup companies: An empirical study. Organization Science, 20(1), 118–133.
Song, M., Im, S., Bij, H., & Song, L. (2011). Does strategic planning enhance or impede innovation and firm performance? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 503–520.
Sońta-Drączkowska, E., Mrożewski, M. (2019). Exploring the role of project management in product development of new technology-based firms. Project Management Journal 8756972819851939.
Spanos, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907–934.
Spencer, A., & Kirchhoff, B. (2006). Schumpeter and new technology based firms: Towards a framework for how NTBFs cause creative destruction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(2), 145–156.
Stewart, W., Jr., & Roth, P. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145.
Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 97–119.
Tatikonda, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47(1), 151–172.
Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.
Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 169–183.
Tripsas, M. (2008). Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2–3), 79–97.
Upton, D. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(2), 72–89.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203–224.
Wang, H., & Chen, W. (2010). Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity. Research Policy, 39(1), 141–154.
Wiltbank, R., Dew, N., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 981–998.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613.
Yu, X., Tao, Y., Tao, X., Xia, F., & Li, Y. (2018). Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: The interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 121–131.
This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness (Ref.: ECO2016-80677-R) and European Union (FEDER Grant).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Alzamora-Ruiz, J., del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. & Martinez-Fiestas, M. Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs. Int Entrep Manag J (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00743-9
- Technology-based SMEs
- Decision-making logics