Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of corporate entrepreneurial strategy on firm performance in China

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implementing corporate entrepreneurial (CE) strategies is a panacea for established firms achieving high performance and gaining sustained competitive advantage in a fast-changing business environment. This paper investigates the effects of CE strategy on firm performance at both overall and individual sub-category (investing in R&D, brand equity, organisational capital and human capital) levels with Chinese listed companies over the period 2010 to 2018. The empirical results indicate two points. (1) Adopting CE strategies has a positive effect on firm performance. When investigating the influence of the specific sub-category, only investing in R&D and human capital influences firm performance significantly, while the effects of investing in brand equity and organisational capital are insignificant. (2) The effects of CE strategy and its sub-categories on firm performance exist heterogeneity across firm ownership and industry context. Specifically, the effect of CE strategy in state-owned (manufacturing) firms is larger than that in privately-owned (service) firms; state-owned firms’ performance is driven by R&D investment, while privately-owned firms’ performance is driven by R&D and human capital investment; manufacturing firms’ performance is driven by R&D and brand equity investment, while service firms’ performance is driven by human capital investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Jinini, D. K., Dahiyat, S. E., & Bontis, N. (2019). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial orientation, and technical innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(2), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. (2011). Strategic resources and firm performance. Management Decision, 49(1), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, J., & Kritikos, A. S. (2016). The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: are micro firms different? Research Policy, 45(6), 1263–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwerth, M., Schwens, C., Isidor, R., & Kabst, R. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Filatotchev, I., Si, S., & Wright, M. (2013). Entrepreneurship and strategy in emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Wang, X., & Cui, A. P. (2019). Solving the innovation problem in state-owned firms: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and high-commitment HR practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 239–250.

  • Chareonsuk, C., & Chansa-ngavej, C. (2010). Intangible asset management framework: an empirical evidence. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(7), 1094–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. B., & Williams, C. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: mediating effects of technology and marketing action across industry types. Industry and Innovation, 23(8), 673–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In Measuring capital in the new economy (pp. 11–46). University of Chicago Press.

  • Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (2007). Strategic use of corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. (2015). Business models, intangibles and firm performance: evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Lim, D. S., & Oh, C. H. (2014). Hierarchy and conservatism in the contributions of resources to entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 507–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, S., & Dutta, D. (2007). Impact of intangible capital on productivity and growth: lessons from the Indian information technology software industry. Economic Record, 83, S73–S86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. H., & Weaver, K. M. (1997). Environmental determinants and individual-level moderators of alliance use. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 404–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeledo, I., & Sivakumar, K. (2004). International market entry mode strategies of manufacturing firms and service firms: a resource-based perspective. International Marketing Review, 21(1), 68–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. (1992). Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: the returns to R&D and advertising. Management Science, 38(9), 1264–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C., Lu, J., & Qian, H. (2019). Entrepreneurship in China. Small Business Economics, 52(3), 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C., Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2007). Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1255–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2003). Antecedents, elements, and consequences of corporate entrepreneurship strategy. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. L1–L6). Briarcliff MAnor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2017). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, 173–199.

  • Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Covin, J. G., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: extending our knowledge boundaries through configuration theory. Small Business Economics, 1–20.

  • Krzeminska, A., & Eckert, C. (2016). Complementarity of internal and external R&D: is there a difference between product versus process innovations? R&D Management, 46(S3), 931–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. P., & Zhou, K. Z. (2012). Is product imitation good for firm performance? An examination of product imitation types and contingency factors. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Zhou, L., & Liu, S. S. (2005). Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China’s transition economy: an integrative framework and empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, A. F., Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr., D. J., Payne, G. T., & Moss, T. W. (2018). Strategic entrepreneurial orientation: configurations, performance, and the effects of industry and time. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(4), 504–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, W., Wang, W., Sun, H., & Yu, C. (2002). Concept hierarchy-based text database categorization. Knowledge and Information Systems, 4(2), 132–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A., & Sok, P. (2014). The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 996–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. J. (2010). Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1247–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, C., De Clercq, D., Zhou, Y., & Liu, C. (2019). Government institutional support, entrepreneurial orientation, strategic renewal, and firm performance in transitional China. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(3), 433–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., & Heavey, C. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge-based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: a study of small-to medium-sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. (2014). How global brands create firm value: the 4V model. International Marketing Review, 31(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2007). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation and ownership type on firm performance in the emerging region of China. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(04), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ark, B., Broersma, L., & den Hertog, P. (2003). Services innovation, performance and policy: a review. Research series, 6, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vomberg, A., Homburg, C., & Bornemann, T. (2015). Talented people and strong brands: the contribution of human capital and brand equity to firm value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 2122–2131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: a review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. M. D., & Sengupta, S. (2016). Stakeholder relationships, brand equity, firm performance: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5561–5568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Jin, J. L., & Banister, D. (2019a). Resources, state ownership and innovation capability: evidence from Chinese automakers. Creativity and Innovation Management., 28, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Liu, Q. (2019b). Study of the relationship between political connections and corporate re-entrepreneurial performance. Sustainability, 11(15).

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number: 15BGL078) and the Research Center of Cooperation of Ningbo Government and Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in 2017 (Grant numbers: NZKT201712).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minglin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Q., Wang, M. & Martínez-Fuentes, C. Impact of corporate entrepreneurial strategy on firm performance in China. Int Entrep Manag J 16, 1427–1444 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00678-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00678-7

Keywords

Navigation