Advertisement

Expert and entrepreneur: the unique research domain of professional service entrepreneurs

  • Steven A. Stewart
Article

Abstract

Professionals are knowledge experts who create customized solutions for clients. Many professionals practice in the context of strong professional institutions that prescribe intense socialization and codes and norms. While some professionals work as employees, many start their own firms in order to practice. Firm start-up for professionals is more prevalent than for most other occupations. While professional institutions often constraint their activities, firm start-up for professional service entrepreneurs (PSEs) involves similar entrepreneurial activities as other entrepreneurs, creating an interesting paradox worth investigating. This paper explores the uniqueness of PSEs and the firms they start, and the distinctiveness and value of research in the context of PSEs and professional service firms.

Keywords

Professionals Professional service firms Professional service providers Professional identity 

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions : An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste, G. (1987). Professionalizing the organization : reducing bureaucracy to enhance effectiveness (1st ed., The Jossey-Bass management series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bird, B. J. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010-11 edition. In U.S. Department of Labor (Ed.).Google Scholar
  5. Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. [article]. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlos, W. C. (2013). From surgeries to startups: How instititutions shape entrepreneurial activity in the field of healthcare. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. [feature]. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., & Hinings, C. R. (2007). Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. [article]. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1515–1539.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28226248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cliff, J. E., Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2006). New to the game and questioning the rules: the experiences and beliefs of founders who start imitative versus innovative firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.010. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, L., & Musson, G. (2000). Entrepreneurial identities: reflections from two case studies. Organization, 7(1), 31–48.  https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840071003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conner-Simmons, A. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to improve early breast cancer detection. http://news.mit.edu/2017/artificial-intelligence-early-breast-cancer-detection-1017. Accessed 27 October 2017.
  12. Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., Brown, J. L., Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. L. (1996). Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4), 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. [article]. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cycyota, C. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: a meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., & Hinings, B. (Eds.). (2015a). The Oxford handbook of professional service firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., & Hinings, B. (2015b). Researching professional service firms: An introduction and overview. In L. Empson, D. Muzio, J. Broschak, & B. Hinings (Eds.), Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 4–8): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: the role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. [article]. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flanigan, T., McFarlane, E., & Cook, S. (2008). Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals—A review of the literature. Section of survey research methods. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Paper presented at the American Academy of public opinion research 2008, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  20. Forbes, D. P., Borchert, P. S., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2006). Entrepreneurial team formation: an exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2010). Florence nightingale endures: legitimizing a new professional role identity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. [article]. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Brown, J. (1990). “P2-form” strategic management: corporate practices in professional partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 725–755.Google Scholar
  25. Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Suddaby, R. (2002). Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. [article]. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.Google Scholar
  26. Greenwood, R., Li, S. X., Prakash, R., & Deephouse, D. L. (2005). Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanations of performance in professional service firms. Organization Science, 16(6), 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. [article]. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamm, J. B., & Nurick, A. J. (1993). The stages of team venture formation: a decision-making model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lander, M. W. (2012). Profits or professionalism? On designing professional service firms. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus Research Institute of Management,Google Scholar
  32. Lander, M. W., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & van Oosterhout, J. (2017). Drift or alignment? A configurational analysis of law firms’ ability to combine profitability with professionalism. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(2), 123–148.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow011.Google Scholar
  33. Larson, A., & Starr, J. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lepisto, D. A., Crosina, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2015). Identity work within and beyond the professions: Toward a theoretical integration and extension. In A. M. C. deSilva & M. T. Aparicio (Eds.), International handbook of professional identities (pp. 11–37). Rosemead: Scientific & Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Løwendahl, B. (2005). Strategic management of professional service firms. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press DK.Google Scholar
  36. Løwendahl, B. (2012). Entrepreneurial strategies for professional service firms. In M. Reihlen & A. Werr (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship in professional services (pp. 183–201). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., Jang, Y., Kuratko, D. F. (2016). Distinguishing types of entrepreneurial ventures: an identity-based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12272.Google Scholar
  39. Murnieks, C. Y., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M. S. (2014). Pathways of passion: identity centrality, passion, and behavior among entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1583–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nanda, A. (2002). Professional codes of ethics (Vol. 3, Vol. 64). Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.Google Scholar
  41. Ofek, E., & Sarvary, M. (2001). Leveraging the customer base: creating competitive advantage through knowledge management. Management Science, 47(11), 1441–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinnington, A., & Morris, T. (2002). Transforming the architect: ownership form and archetype change. Organization Studies, 23(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinnington, A., & Morris, T. (2003). Archetype change in professional organizations: survey evidence from large law firms. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. (2014). It's what you make of it: founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1406–1433.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. [article]. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reihlen, M., & Werr, A. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on entrepreneurship in professional services. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Reihlen, M., & Werr, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship and professional service firms. In L. Empson, D. Muzio, J. Broschak, & B. Hinings (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of professional service firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Relman, A. (1986). An exchange on for-profit health care. In B. H. Gray (Ed.), For-profit enterprise in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contraditions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slay, H. S., & Smith, D. A. (2011). Professional identity construction: using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities. Human Relations, 64(1), 85–107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710384290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart, S. A., & Hoell, R. C. (2016). Hire someone like me, or hire someone I need: entrepreneur identity and early-stage hiring in small firms. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 28(3), 187–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2015.1132514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart, S. A., Castrogiovanni, G. J., & Hudson, B. A. (2016). A foot in both camps: role identity and entrepreneurial orientation in professional service firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 22(5), 718–744.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2015-0201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sudman, S. (1985). Mail surveys of reluctant professionals. Evaluation Review, 9(3), 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Torres, D. (1991). What, if anything is professionalism? Institutions and the problem of change. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8, 43–68.Google Scholar
  56. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209–264, Vol. 1). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  57. Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.Google Scholar
  58. Walsh, K., & Gordon, J. R. (2001). The work identity of professional service providers: Cornell University, Center for Hospitality Research.Google Scholar
  59. Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations