On the boundaries of social entrepreneurship: a review of relationships with related research domains

Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship represents a unique and distinctive domain within the broader discipline of entrepreneurship research. The sub-field of social entrepreneurship also shares many commonalities with various sub-fields of larger fields of research such as corporate social responsibility, base of pyramid, non-profit management, social innovation, and impact investing. Understanding the boundaries of social entrepreneurship as well as its relations to these other areas of research is increasingly important as these sub-fields continue to evolve. We provide a clear and concise delineation of social entrepreneurship as a research domain to aid future researchers attempting to understand how social entrepreneurship connects to these other streams of research. Finally, we conclude by outlining research questions that exist at the boundaries of social entrepreneurship and these related sub-fields of research.

Keywords

Social entrepreneurship Corporate social responsibility Base of pyramid Non-profit management Social innovation Impact investing 

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 855–879). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvord, S. H., Brown, D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: an exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  6. Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation 'came to be': tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, D. P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3), 683–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: a defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, C. L. (2016). Impact investing: a primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
  13. Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship the Kauffman foundation. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation and Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grabenwarter, U., & Liechtenstein, H. (2011). In search of gamma: An unconventional perspective on impact investing. IESE, Family Office Circle Foundation.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2120040.
  16. Koe, H. N., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the "base/bottom of the pyramid" (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, M. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: how compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milligan, K., & Schöning, M. (2011). Taking a realistic approach to impact investing: observations from the world economic forum's global agenda council on social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(3), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prahalad, C. K. (2002). Strategies for the bottom of the economic pyramid: India as a source of innovation. Reflections: The SoL Journal, 3(4), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world's poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80, 48.Google Scholar
  30. Prahalad, C. K., & Lieberthal, K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 81(8), 109–117.Google Scholar
  31. Roberts, D., & Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: the concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 45–51.Google Scholar
  32. Ruskin, J., Seymour, R. G., & Webster, C. M. (2016). Why create value for others? An exploration of social entrepreneurial motives. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 1015–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruvio, A., Rosenblatt, Z., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Entrepreneurial leadership vision in nonprofit vs. for-profit organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon, J., & Barmeier, J. (2010). More than money: Impact investing for development. ().Center for Global Development. Retrieved from Social Science Premium Collection Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.fgcu.edu/docview/1820848232.
  36. Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tan, W., Williams, J., & Tan, T. (2005). Defining the 'social' in 'social entrepreneurship': Altruism and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(3), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Have, Robert, P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: a review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wood, S. (2012). Prone to progress: using personality to identify supporters of innovative social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yitshaki, R., & Kropp, F. (2016). Entrepreneurial passions and identities in different contexts: a comparison between high-tech and social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 28(3–4), 206–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lutgert College of BusinessFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA
  2. 2.Management Programs DepartmentFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations