On the boundaries of social entrepreneurship: a review of relationships with related research domains
- 190 Downloads
Social entrepreneurship represents a unique and distinctive domain within the broader discipline of entrepreneurship research. The sub-field of social entrepreneurship also shares many commonalities with various sub-fields of larger fields of research such as corporate social responsibility, base of pyramid, non-profit management, social innovation, and impact investing. Understanding the boundaries of social entrepreneurship as well as its relations to these other areas of research is increasingly important as these sub-fields continue to evolve. We provide a clear and concise delineation of social entrepreneurship as a research domain to aid future researchers attempting to understand how social entrepreneurship connects to these other streams of research. Finally, we conclude by outlining research questions that exist at the boundaries of social entrepreneurship and these related sub-fields of research.
KeywordsSocial entrepreneurship Corporate social responsibility Base of pyramid Non-profit management Social innovation Impact investing
- Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 855–879). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.Google Scholar
- Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.Google Scholar
- Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
- Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship the Kauffman foundation. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation and Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Grabenwarter, U., & Liechtenstein, H. (2011). In search of gamma: An unconventional perspective on impact investing. IESE, Family Office Circle Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2120040.
- McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
- Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world's poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80, 48.Google Scholar
- Prahalad, C. K., & Lieberthal, K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 81(8), 109–117.Google Scholar
- Roberts, D., & Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: the concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 45–51.Google Scholar
- Simon, J., & Barmeier, J. (2010). More than money: Impact investing for development. ().Center for Global Development. Retrieved from Social Science Premium Collection Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.fgcu.edu/docview/1820848232.
- Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar