To examine whether firms’ environmental innovation can improve consumers’ purchasing tendencies, we constructed a mediation model with moderation based on attribution theory. We used the altruistic attribution of firms’ environmental innovation as the intermediation role and corporate environmental violations as the moderator, and we experimentally verified the model. The empirical results suggest that firms’ environmental innovation positively affects consumers’ purchase intention and that the positive effect of eco-product innovation is greater than that of eco-process innovation. Consumers’ altruistic attribution of firms’ environmental innovation behavior is decreased when an enterprise has environmental violations, which in turn weakens consumers’ purchase intention.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arvola A, Vassallo M, Dean M, Lampila P, Saba A, Lä Hteenmä Ki L (2008) Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: the role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 50(2-3):443–454
Assiouras I, Liapati G, Kouletsis G, Koniordos M (2015) The impact of brand authenticity on brand attachment in the food industry. Br Food J 117(2):538–552
Bauman CW, Skitka LJ (2012) Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Res Organ Behav 32:63–86
Becker-Olsen KL, Cudmore BA, Hill RP (2006) The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Bus Res 59(1):46–53
Berens G, Riel CBMV, Bruggen GHV (2005) Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. J Mark 69(3):35–48
Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark 61(1):68–84
Carberry EJ, King BG (2012) Defensive practice adoption in the face of organizational stigma: impression management and the diffusion of stock option expensing. J Manag Stud 49(7):1137–1167
Chan RYK, Leung TKP, Wong YH (2006) The effectiveness of environmental claims for services advertising. J Serv Mark 20(4):233–250
Chen YS, Chang CH (2012) Enhance green purchase intentions: the roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag Decis 50(3):502–520
Cheng CC, Shiu EC (2012) Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: an implementation perspective. Technovation 32(6):329–344
Cho Y-N (2015) Different shades of green consciousness: the interplay of sustainability labeling and environmental impact on product evaluations. J Bus Ethics 128(1):73–82
Creyer, Elizabeth H (1997) The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? J Consum Mark 14(6):421–432
De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41(3):614–623
Degirmenci K, Breitner MH (2017) Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: is green more important than price and range? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 51:250–260
Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D (1991) Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. J Mark Res 28(3):307–319
Dwane HD (2003) Consumer perception of corporate donations effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. J Advert 32(4):91–102
Ellen PS, Webb DJ, Mohr LA (2006) Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):147–157
Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psychol Bull 117(1):21–38
Grappi S, Romani S, Bagozzi RP (2013) Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: moral emotions and virtues. J Bus Res 66(10):1814–1821
Groza MD, Pronschinske MR, Walker M (2011) Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. J Bus Ethics 102(4):639–652
Gürhan-Canli Z, Batra R (2004) When corporate image affects product evaluations: the moderating role of perceived risk. J Mark Res 41(2):197–205
Harrison R, Newholm T, Shaw D (2005) The Ethical Consumer. Sage Publications, London
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press, New York
Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37(1):163–173
Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122
Huang XX, Hu ZP, Liu CS, Yu DJ, Yu LF (2016) The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance. J Clean Prod 112:3423–3433
Jansson J, Marell A, Nordlund A (2010) Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J Consum Mark 27(4):358–370
Jones EE, Davis KE (1965) From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2(4):219–266
Joshi Y, Rahman Z (2015) Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. Int Strat Manag Rev 3(1-2):128–143
Kang KH, Stein L, Heo CY, Lee S (2012) Consumers’ willingness to pay for green initiatives of the hotel industry. Int J Hosp Manag 31(2):564–572
Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—a typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol Econ 72:28–36
Kirsch D, Goldfarb B, Gera A (2009) Form or substance: the role of business plans in venture capital decision making. Strateg Manag J 30(5):487–515
Kotler P (2011) Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. J Mark 75(4):132–135
Kronrod A, Grinstein A, Wathieu L (2011) Go green! should environmental messages be so assertive? J Mark 76(1):95–102
la Cour A, Kromann J (2011) Euphemisms and hypocrisy in corporate philanthropy. Business Ethics Eur Rev 20(3):267–279
Laufer WS (2003) Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J Bus Ethics 43(3):253–261
Lin RJ, Tan KH, Geng Y (2013) Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. J Clean Prod 40:101–107
Liu X, Wang C, Shishime T, Fujitsuka T (2012) Sustainable consumption: green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustain Dev 20(4):293–308
Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Irwin JR, Raghunathan R (2010) The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. J Mark 74(5):18–31
Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2011) Greenwash: corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J Econ Manag Strateg 20(1):3–41
Mainieri T, Barnett EG, Valdero TR, Unipan JB, Oskamp S (1997) Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. J Soc Psychol 137(2):189–204
Mohr LA, Webb DJ (2005) The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. J Consum Aff 39(1):121–147
Moisander JK (2007) Motivational complexity of green consumerism. Int J Consum Stud 31(4):404–409
Napoli J, Dickinson SJ, Beverland MB, Farrelly F (2014) Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. J Bus Res 67(6):1090–1098
OECD (2009) Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation: framework, practices and measurement—synthesis report. OECD, Paris
Ogunfowora B, Stackhouse M, Oh WY (2018) Media depictions of CEO ethics and stakeholder support of CSR initiatives: the mediating roles of CSR motive attributions and cynicism. J Bus Ethics 150:525–540
Pino G, Amatulli C, De Angelis M, Peluso AM (2016) The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: evidence from Italy. J Clean Prod 112:2861–2869
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118
Pozner JE (2008) Stigma and settling up: an integrated approach to the consequences of organizational misconduct for organizational elites. J Bus Ethics 80(1):141–150
Pujari D, Peattie K, Wright G (2004) Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Ind Mark Manag 33(5):381–391
Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332
Rifon NJ, Choi SM, Trimble CS, Li H (2004) Congruence effects in sponsorship. J Advert 33(1):29–42
Skarmeas D, Leonidou CN (2013) When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. J Bus Res 66(10):1831–1838
Story J, Neves P (2015) When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics Eur Rev 24(2):111–124
van de Ven B (2008) An ethical framework for the marketing of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 82:339–352
Vlachos PA, Panagopoulos NG, Rapp AA (2013) Feeling good by doing good: employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. J Bus Ethics 118(3):577–588
Wei W, Kim G, Miao L, Behnke C, Almanza B (2018) Consumer inferences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims on packaged foods. J Bus Res 83(2):186–201
Yadav R, Pathak GS (2016) Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod 135:732–739
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their helpful advice.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72002073), the Soft Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (2019A101002048), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR20G030003).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
About this article
Cite this article
Long, S., Liao, Z. Would consumers pay for environmental innovation? The moderating role of corporate environmental violations. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12811-2
- Environmental innovation
- Purchase intention
- Altruistic attribution
- Environmental violation