Environmental quality and output volatility: the case of South Asian economies

Abstract

This study explores the impact of environmental degradation on output volatility for eight South Asian economies over the time span 1971–2017. Environmental degradation is measured by CO2 emissions, nitrous oxide (N2O), methane emissions (CH4), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and environmental pollutants index (EPI), whereas output volatility is constructed using a rolling window of five-year moving standard deviation. The results of cross-sectional dependence (CSD) tests indicate the presence of CSD among South Asian economies. For empirical analysis, second-generation panel time series approaches are employed. Also, the findings of panel unit root tests (URTs) signify that the variables are stationary at the first difference and have a long-run relationship. Westerlund cointegration test is used to assess the long-run relationship among the variables. Moreover, this study has used a fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) and dynamic modified ordinary least square (DOLS) methods to examine the relationship between environmental degradation and output volatility. In the long run, all indicators of environmental degradation are positive and significant signaling the harmful effects of environmental degradation on output volatility. However, the impact of nitrous oxide is larger relative to other indicators used in the study. The outcome, therefore, suggests that promoting clean investment in nitric acid plants might help improve the environmental quality in the region which in turn fosters the process of economic stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Data availability

Data will be provided on formal request.

References

  1. Al-Amin MA (2013) An assessment of Nigeria’s preparedness for environmental disasters from its commitment to international environmental treaties. Eur Sci J 9(32):242–253

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarado R, Toledo E (2017) Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country. Environ Dev Sustain 19(4):1205–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, D., & Rees, D. (2009). Macroeconomic volatility and terms of trade shocks (Working Paper No. rdp2009-05). Reserve Bank of Australia.

  4. Azam M (2016) Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhandari MP (2013) Environmental performance and vulnerability to climate change: a case study of India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Pakistan. In: In Climate change and disaster risk management. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–167

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Easterly, W., Islam, R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Shaken and stirred: Explaining growth volatility. Presented at Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2000. World Bank, Washington

  8. Forkel M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Keeling R, Heimann M, Thonicke K, ...Reichstein M (2016) Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems. Science 351(6274):696-699

  9. Furceri, D., & Poplawski Ribeiro, M. (2008). Government consumption volatility and country size (Working Paper No. 17). Centre D’tudes Prospectiveset D’Informations Internationales

  10. Gavin M, Hausmann R (1996) Sources of macroeconomic volatility in developing economies (Working Paper). Inter-American Development Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gounder R, Saha S (2007) Economic volatility, economic vulnerability and foreign aid: Empirical results for the South Pacific island nations (Discussion Paper No. 0702). Department of Applied and International Economics, Massey University, New Zealand

  12. Gwangndi MI, Muhammad YA, Tagi SM (2016) The impact of environmental degradation on human health and its relevance to the right to health under international law. Eur Sci J, ESJ 12(10):485–503

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hakura DS (2009) Output Volatility in emerging market and developing countries: what explains the “Great Moderation” of 1970-2003? Czech J Econ Finance 59(3):229–254

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen BE (1995) Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing: using covariates to increase power. Econ Theory 11(5):1148–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasnat GT, Kabir MA, Hossain MA (2019) Major environmental issues and problems of South Asia, particularly Bangladesh. Handb Environ Mater Manag:109–148

  17. IMF (2008) The fiscal implications of climate change. International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington

  18. IOM (2016) Assessing the climate change environmental degradation and migration nexus in South Asia. In: International Organization for Migration. The UN Migration Agency, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  19. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014, synthesis report. IPCC, Geneva Retrieved from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessmentreport/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  20. Işik C, Kasımatı E, Ongan S (2017) Analyzing the causalities between economic growth, financial development, international trade, tourism expenditure on the CO2 emissions in Greece. Energy Sources Part B: Econ Plan Policy 12(7):665–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jouanjean MA, Tucker J, te Velde DW (2014) Understanding the effects of resource degradation on socio-economic outcomes in developing countries. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90(1):1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kum H, Ocal O, Aslan A (2012) The relationship among natural gas energy consumption, capital and economic growth: bootstrap-corrected causality tests from G-7 countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2361–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee D, Min SK, Fischer E, Shiogama H, Bethke I, Lierhammer L, Scinocca JF (2018) Impacts of half a degree additional warming on the Asian summer monsoon rainfall characteristics. Environ Res Lett 13(4):044033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Environmental degradation and output volatility: a global perspective. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(1):180–208

    Google Scholar 

  26. Majeed MT, Mumtaz S (2017) Happiness and environmental degradation: a global analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 11(3):753–772

    Google Scholar 

  27. Majeed MT, Noreen A (2018) Financial development and output volatility: a cross-sectional panel data analysis. Lahore J Econ 23(1):97–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirza MMQ (2011) Climate change, flooding in South Asia and implications. Reg Environ Chang 11(1):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moser CM, Barrett CB (2006) The complex dynamics of smallholder technology adoption: the case of SRI in Madagascar. Agric Econ 35(3):373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Negev M, Garb Y, Biller R, Sagy G, Tal A (2009) Environmental problems, causes, and solutions: an open question. J Environ Educ 41(2):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ocal O, Ozturk I, Aslan A (2013) Coal consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Int J Energy Econ Policy 3(2):193–198

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pedroni P (1997) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series with an application to the PPP hypothesis: New results (Working Paper). Indiana University.

  33. Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (pp. 93-130). Emerald Group Publishing Limited

  35. Pesaran HM (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435). University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Phillips AL (1995) 1995 Derivatives practices and instruments survey. Financ Manag 24(2):115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Phillips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Phillips PC, Xiao Z (1998) A primer on unit root testing. J Econ Surv 12(5):423–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Qayyum U, Sohail A, Sabir S (2020) Armed conflicts, militarization, and ecological footprint: empirical evidence from South Asia. J Clea Prod 281:125299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Raddatz C (2008). External Shocks and macroeconomic volatility in Latin America. The World Bank, Development Economics Vice Presidency (DEC).

  42. Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(32):33387–33398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sabir S, Qayyum U, Majeed T (2020) FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32544–32553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saeed F, Bethke I, Fischer E, Legutke S, Shiogama H, Stone DA, Schleussner CF (2018) Robust changes in tropical rainy season length at 1.5 C and 2 C. Environ Res Lett 13(6):064024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schewe J, Heinke J, Gerten D, Haddeland I, Arnell NW, Clark DB, Gosling SN (2014) Multi-model assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(9):3245–3250

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2947–2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Solarin SA, Shahbaz M (2015) Natural gas consumption and economic growth: the role of foreign direct investment, capital formation and trade openness in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tornell A, Westermann F, Martinez L (2003) Liberalization, growth, and financial crises: lessons from Mexico and the developing world. Brook Pap Econ Act 2003(2):1–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vásquez, G.C. (2015). Indigenous people and climate change: causes of flooding in the Bolivian Amazon and consequences for the indigenous populaton. In: GCD Ramos (ed) Inequality and climate change: perspectves from the South. Dakar: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), pp. 121–136

  50. WESS (2013) Sustainable development challenges. World Economic and Social Survey, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tariq Majeed has done each section of this paper. Maria Mazhar and Samina Sabir have worked on literature review and methodology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Tariq Majeed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not Applicable

Consent to participate

All the participants in this study consented to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majeed, M.T., Mazhar, M. & Sabir, S. Environmental quality and output volatility: the case of South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12659-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Output volatility
  • Environmental degradation
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Methane
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Panel cointegration