Dynamic relationship among agriculture-energy-forestry and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from China

Abstract

This study aims to explore the dynamic association among crop production, livestock production, power consumption in agriculture, forest area, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Based on the annual data of China, spanning the period 1990 to 2016, the study applied the auto-regressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach. In addition, the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) canonical cointegration regression (CCR) and the Granger causality tests are employed to check the robustness of the ARDL estimations. The ARDL-bounds testing approach indicated that all variables share a long-run connection. The long- and short-run ARDL estimations confirmed that crop production, as well as livestock production, has a significant positive effect on CO2 emissions in both cases. However, power consumption in agriculture and forest area has a negative effect on it, indicating that both variables reduce CO2 emissions in the long and short run. These results stood robust under various regression estimators and confirmed the findings of the ARDL method. Additionally, the results of the causality approach specified that a unidirectional causality is running from crop production, power consumption in agriculture, and forest area to CO2 emissions. The causality between livestock production and CO2 emissions is bidirectional. Therefore, the directions of this connection also validate the outcomes under various techniques used for robustness. These findings suggest that the government must reconsider its policies related to agricultural and livestock production and adopt environment-friendly practices in the agriculture sector that may reduce the carbon footprints in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

  2. 2.

    www.fao.org

  3. 3.

    http://data.worldbank.org

  4. 4.

    http://data.stats.gov.cn/english/

References

  1. Adom PK, Bekoe W, Akoena SKK (2012) Modelling aggregate domestic electricity demand in Ghana: an autoregressive distributed lag bounds cointegration approach. Energy Policy 42:530–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agboola MO, Bekun FV (2019) Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:27660–27676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aid A (2008): The time is now; lesson from farmers to adapting to climate change. Retired from: www. actionaid. org. on August 10, 2009

  4. Ali S, Ying L, Shah T, Tariq A, Chandio AA, Ali I (2019) Analysis of the Nexus of CO2 emissions, economic growth, land under cereal crops and agriculture value-added in Pakistan using an ARDL approach. Energies 12:4590

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Appiah K, Du J, Poku J (2018) Causal relationship between agricultural production and carbon dioxide emissions in selected emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24764–24777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions, GDP, energy use, and population growth: a multivariate and causality analysis for Ghana, 1971–2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:13508–13520

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aziz N, Sharif A, Raza A, Rong K (2020) Revisiting the role of forestry, agriculture, and renewable energy in testing environment Kuznets curve in Pakistan: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  8. Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Rehman A (2019) Energy consumption and agricultural economic growth in Pakistan: is there a nexus? Int J Energy Sect Manag 13:597–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica:1057–1072

  10. Dogan N (2016) Agriculture and environmental Kuznets curves in the case of Turkey: evidence from the ARDL and bounds test. Agric Econ 62:566–574

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica:251–276

  12. FAO (2020a): Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files, and website. (1990 – 2016). Crop Production Index. Retrieved Feb 03, 2020, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.PRD.CROP.XD?end=2016&locations=CN&start=1990&view=chart

  13. FAO (2020b) Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files, and website. (1990 – 2016). Livestock Production Index. Retrieved Feb 03, 2020, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.PRD.LVSK.XD?end=2016&locations=CN&start=1990&view=chart

  14. FAO (2020c) Food Agriculture Organization FAO Statistical Yearbooks—World food and agriculture. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E.

  15. Farooq MU, Shahzad U, Sarwar S, ZaiJun L (2019) The impact of carbon emission and forest activities on health outcomes: empirical evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:12894–12906

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Filipovic D, Kosutic S, Gospodaric Z, Zimmer R, Banaj D (2006) The possibilities of fuel savings and the reduction of CO2 emissions in the soil tillage in Croatia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115:290–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosh S (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption in agriculture: a causality analysis for India. Arthaniti: J Econ Theor Pract 17:183–207

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harris JM, Feriz MB (2011) Forests, agriculture, and climate: economics and policy issues

  19. Hongmin D, Yu'e L, Xiuping T, Xiaopei P, Na L, Zhiping Z (2008) China greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities and its mitigation strategy. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 2008

  20. IEA (2012) International Energy Agency, Retrieved Feb 03, 2020, from https://www.iea.org/

  21. Ismael M, Srouji F, Boutabba MA (2018) Agricultural technologies and carbon emissions: evidence from Jordanian economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10867–10877

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan MTI, Ali Q, Ashfaq M (2018) The nexus between greenhouse gas emission, electricity production, renewable energy and agriculture in Pakistan. Renew Energy 118:437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koondhar MA, Li H, Wang H, Bold S, Kong R (2020) Looking back over the past two decades on the nexus between air pollution, energy consumption, and agricultural productivity in China: a qualitative analysis based on the ARDL bounds testing model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–15

  25. Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?”. J Econom 54(1–3)159–178. available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y

  26. Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo Z (1998) Wood Energy in China: Regional Wood Energy Development Programme in Asia (GCP/RAS/154/NET). Wood Energy News 13(3). Retrieved Feb 09, 2020, from http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/HC270799/RWEDP/acrobat/wen13-3.pdf

  28. Luo Y, Long X, Wu C, Zhang J (2017) Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014. J Clean Prod 159:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahmood H, Alkhateeb TTY, Al-Qahtani MMZ, Allam Z, Ahmad N, Furqan M (2019) Agriculture development and CO2 emissions nexus in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 14

  30. McAusland C (2010) Globalisation’s direct and indirect effects on the environment.

  31. NBS (2016) China Energy Statistical Yearbook (2016) National Bureau of Statistics 2016. China Statistics Press, Beijing

  32. NBS (2017) China Energy Statistical Yearbook (2017) National Bureau of Statistics 2017. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  33. Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) Is there a causal effect between agricultural production and carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana? Environ Eng Res 22:40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parajuli R, Joshi O, Maraseni TN (2019) Incorporating forests, agriculture, and energy consumption in the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve: a dynamic panel data approach. Sustainability 11:2688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Qiao H, Zheng F, Jiang H, Dong K (2019) The greenhouse effect of the 728 agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: evidence 729 from G20 countries. Sci Total Environ 671:722–731

  38. Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sarkodie SA, Owusu PA (2017) The relationship between carbon dioxide, crop and food production index in Ghana: by estimating the long-run elasticities and variance decomposition. Environ Eng Res 22:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sommerfeld J (1999) World population hits 6 billion; a baby born in Sarajevo revives the population debate. Retrieved Jan 31, 2020, from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3072068/ns/us_news-only/t/world-population-hits-billion/#.XjPGamgzbIV

  41. Waheed R, Chang D, Sarwar S, Chen W (2018) Forest, agriculture, renewable energy, and CO2 emission. J Clean Prod 172:4231–4238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. WDI (2018) World Development Indicators. (2018). World Bank Database. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/.

  43. Xiong C, Yang D, Xia F, Huo J (2016) Changes in agricultural carbon emissions and factors that influence agricultural carbon emissions based on different stages in Xinjiang, China. Sci Rep 6:36912

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Z, Wang D, Du T, Zhang A, Zhou Y (2018) Total-factor energy efficiency in China’s agricultural sector: trends, disparities and potentials. Energies 11:853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zandi G, Haseeb M (2019) The importance of green energy consumption and agriculture in reducing environmental degradation: evidence from sub-Saharan African countries. Int J Financ Res 10:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Ali Chandio.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandio, A.A., Akram, W., Ahmad, F. et al. Dynamic relationship among agriculture-energy-forestry and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09560-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • CO2 emissions
  • Agricultural production
  • Cointegration approach
  • China