Abstract
Applying a global DEA model based on non-radial directional distance function, this paper constructs a comprehensive efficiency index to estimate green development level and further identifies the influencing mechanism of technology R&D on green development in China’s industrial sector. The results demonstrate that the level of green development in China’s industrial sector declined year by year and the average was 0.27, and it also shows significant regional characteristics within the sample period. Besides, the environment pollution transferred from the east to the central and the west. In addition, the results also indicate that there is a threshold effect for the impact of technology R&D on China’s industrial green development. Based on the volume of the trade openness, this effect presents a “N”-type characteristic that tilts to the right. According to the research results, the corresponding policy recommendations are put forward, which may be of great importance to improve the green development level in China’s industrial sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GDI:
-
Green Development index
- Technology R&D:
-
Technology research and development
- DEA:
-
Data envelopment analysis
- SDF:
-
Shephard distance function
- DDF:
-
Directional distance function
- NDDF:
-
Non-radial distance function
- EC:
-
Change in efficiency
- TPC:
-
Change in technology progress
- CEC:
-
Change in the catch-up effect
- TE:
-
Green technology efficiency
- GPR:
-
Green technology process gap ratio
- TCR:
-
Green technology catch–effect gap ratio
- MGD:
-
Malmquist GD index
- FDI:
-
foreign direct investment
References
Ai H, Deng Z, Yang X (2015) The effect estimation and channel testing of the technological progress on China’s regional environmental performance. Ecol Indic 51:67–78
Aller C, Ductor L, Herrerias MJ (2015) The world trade network and the environment. Energy Econ 52:55–68
Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778
Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173
Baek J (2016) A new look at the FDI–income–energy–environment nexus: dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy 91:22–27
Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8
Bin S, Yue L (2012) Impact of foreign direct investment on China’s environment: an empirical study based on industrial panel data. Social Sciences in China 33(04):89–107
Birdsall, N. and D. Wheeler (2017). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? International Trade and the Environment: 355-368.
Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2006) WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J SI2006
Cherniwchan J (2017) Trade liberalization and the environment: evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing. J Int Econ 105:130–149
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240
Dalvi-Esfahani M, Alaedini Z, Nilashi M, Samad S, Asadi S, Mohammadi M (2020) Students' green information technology behavior: beliefs and personality traits. J Clean Prod 257:120406
Danish and R. Ulucak (2020). How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment 712.
Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250
Du KR, Li PZ, Yan ZM (2019a) Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:297–303
Du ZL, Lin BQ, Guan CX (2019b) Development path of electric vehicles in China under environmental and energy security constraints. Resour Conserv Recycl 143:17–26
Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ 70(1):1–23
Fukuyama H, Yoshida Y, Managi S (2011) Modal choice between air and rail: a social efficiency benchmarking analysis that considers CO2 emissions. Environ Econ Policy Stud 13(2):89–102
Gong X, Mi JN, Wei CY, Yang RT (2019) Measuring environmental and economic performance of air pollution control for province-level areas in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(8)
Goulder LH, Schneider SH (1999) Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resour Energy Econ 21(3):211–253
Hirukawa M, Sakudo M (2018) Functional-coefficient cointegration models in the presence of deterministic trends. Econ Rev 37(5):507–533
Huang J, Cai X, Huang S, Tian S, Lei H (2019) Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: evidence based on a panel threshold model. China Econ Rev 54:271–285
Kolcava D, Nguyen Q, Bernauer T (2019) Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? Ecol Econ 163:98–112
Lee SK, Mogi G (2018) Relative efficiency of energy technologies in the Korean mid-term strategic energy technology development plan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:472–482
Li K, Lin B (2018) How to promote energy efficiency through technological progress in China? Energy 143:812–821
Li A, Zhang A, Huang H, Yao X (2018) Measuring unified efficiency of fossil fuel power plants across provinces in China: an analysis based on non-radial directional distance functions. Energy 152:549–561
Li J, Xie C, Long H (2019a) The roles of inter-fuel substitution and inter-market contagion in driving energy prices: evidences from China’s coal market. Energy Econ 84:104525
Li, J. L., H. X. Liu and K. R. Du (2019b). Does market-oriented reform increase energy rebound effect? Evidence from China's regional development. China Economic Review 56.
Lin B, Du K (2015) Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China's regional economies: do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy 78:113–124
Lin BQ, Xu B (2020) How does fossil energy abundance affect China's economic growth and CO2 emissions? Sci Total Environ 719:137503
Love, I., B. Javorcik and A. Brucal (2017). Pollution haven or halo? Evidence from foreign acquisitions in Indonesia. Meeting Papers. Society for Economic Dynamics.
Lovely M, Popp D (2011) Trade, technology, and the environment: does access to technology promote environmental regulation? J Environ Econ Manag 61(1):16–35
Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363
Mirza FM, Ansar S, Ullah K, Maqsood F (2020) The impact of information and communication technologies, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption on inclusive development in developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(3):3143–3155
Oh DH, Lee J-d (2010) A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empir Econ 38(1):47–64
Peng DM, Yang Q, Yang HJ, Liu HH, Zhu YG, Mu YT (2020) Analysis on the relationship between fisheries economic growth and marine environmental pollution in China's coastal regions. Sci Total Environ 713:136641
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102
Roy J (2017) On the environmental consequences of intra-industry trade. J Environ Econ Manag 83:50–67
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857
Shi X, Sun S (2017) Energy price, regulatory price distortion and economic growth: a case study of China. Energy Econ 63:261–271
Son H, Chung Y, Hwang H (2019) Do technology entrepreneurship and external relationships always promote technology transfer? Evidence from Korean public research organizations. Technovation 82-83:1–15
Song M-L, Cao S-P, Wang S-H (2019a) The impact of knowledge trade on sustainable development and environment-biased technical progress. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144:512–523
Song Y, Yang TT, Zhang M (2019b) Research on the impact of environmental regulation on enterprise technology innovation—an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(21):21835–21848
Stern DI (2012) Modeling international trends in energy efficiency. Energy Econ 34(6):2200–2208
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2011) DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Econ 33(2):292–303
Sueyoshi T, Li AJ, Liu XH (2019) Exploring sources of China's CO2 emission: decomposition analysis under different technology changes. Eur J Oper Res 279(3):984–995
Sun YG, Malikov E (2018) Estimation and inference in functional-coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. J Econ 203(2):359–378
Tran NV, Tran QV, Do LTT, Dinh LH, Do HTT (2019) Trade off between environment, energy consumption and human development: do levels of economic development matter? Energy 173:483–493
Tulkens H, Eeckaut PV (1995) Non-frontier measures of efficiency, progress and regress for time series data. Int J Prod Econ 39(1-2):83–97
Walter I, Ugelow JL (1979) Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio 8(2):102–109
Wang H, Zhou P, Zhou DQ (2013) Scenario-based energy efficiency and productivity in China: a non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Econ 40:795–803
Weixian W, Fang Y (2010) Impact of technology advance on carbon dioxide emission in China. Statistical Research 27(07):36–44
Xiaoping L, Xianxian L (2010) International trade, pollution industry transfer and Chinese industries' CO2 emissions. Econ Res J 45(01):15–26
Yang YC, Nie PY, Huang JB (2020) The optimal strategies for clean technology to advance green transition. Sci Total Environ 716:134439
Yao X, Zhou H, Zhang A, Li A (2015) Regional energy efficiency, carbon emission performance and technology gaps in China: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy 84:142–154
Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou FJ (2019) The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15162–15173
Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J (2017) Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(21):17616–17625
Zhang N, Zhao KK, Yu YT (2020) The effect of environmental regulation on air pollution, productivity, and factor structure: a quasi-natural experiment evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res
Zhou, P., B. W. Ang and H. Wang (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 221(3): 0-0, 625, 635.
Zhou D, Lin ZL, Lim SH (2019) Spatial characteristics and risk factor identification for land use spatial conflicts in a rapid urbanization region in China. Environ Monit Assess 191(11):677
Zihui Y, Lei T (2017) A panel co-integration analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis and its determinants in China. The Journal of World Economy 40(05):148–172
Zugravu-Soilita N (2017) How does foreign direct investment affect pollution? Toward a better understanding of the direct and conditional effects. Environmental &. Res Econ 66(2):293–338
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (2019VI020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fei, R., Cui, A. & Qin, K. Can technology R&D continuously improve green development level in the open economy? Empirical evidence from China’s industrial sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 34052–34066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09357-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09357-0