Abstract
Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) and fig (Ficus carica) are considered as two of the most important forest species worldwide with nutritional values. This study was carried out in the Ahoochar region, during 2015–2017.This study was conducted to compare the ability of fig and eucalyptus in carbon sequestration as well as some of soil characteristics. This study was conducted as factorial experiment within a complete randomized design. According to the obtained results, fig trees have higher ability of carbon sequestration compared with eucalyptus. Soil of fig trees had a higher pH, bulk density, organic matter, organic carbon, and carbon sequestration compared with eucalyptus. However, the electrical conductivity (EC) of eucalyptus soil was significantly higher than fig. The amounts of organic carbon, organic matter, and carbon sequestration at the soil depth of 0–15 cm were significantly higher than the depth of 15–30. Shallower soils contained higher percentages of organic carbon in comparison with deeper soils, and there was a significant difference between the depths of 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm which contained 1.72% and 0.87% of organic carbon, respectively. The highest percentage of organic carbon was measured in the fig soil at a depth of 0–15 cm (2.33%), whereas the lowest percentage (0.58%) was measured in the control soil at 15–30 cm. In total, fig tree with a good ability in carbon sequestration can be a good candidate for the forest management and rehabilitation especially in dry and semi dryland.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadi H, Heshmati G, Nasseri HR (2014) Potentials of carbon sequestration in soils of arid lands cultivated with haloxylon and Stipagrostis pennata (a case study of Aran and Bidgol). Desert Ecosys Manage 3:29–36
Amundson R (2001) The carbon budget in soils. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 29:535–562
Chowdhury N, Marschner P, Burns R (2011) Response of microbial activity and community structure to decreasing soil osmotic and matric potential. Plant Soil Ecol 344:54–241
Dinakaran J, Krishnayya N (2008) Variations in type of vegetal cover and heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in affecting sink capacity of tropical soils. Curr Sci 94:1144–1150
Dixon RK, Wisniewski J (1995) Global forest systems: an uncertain response to atmospheric pollutants and global climate change? Water Air Soil Pollut 85:101–110
Farage P, Ardo J, Olsson L, Rienzi E, Ball A, Pretty J (2007) The potential for soil carbon sequestration in three tropical dryland farming systems of Africa and Latin America: a modelling approach. Soil Tillage Res 94:457–472
Foroozeh M (2006) Soil and dominant plant carbon sequestration in flood spreading in Garbaygan Fasa. MS. c thesis. Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University of Gorgan
Frank AB, Karn JF (2003) Vegetation indices, CO2 flux, and biomass for Northern Plains grasslands. Range Manage 56:382–387
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2007: the scientific basis. In: IPCC third assessment report, working group I, technical summary. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 881 pp
IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: the scientific basis. IPCC fourth assessment. A report of Working group I of the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 18pp
Iranmanesh M, Sadeghi H (2019) The effect of soil organic matter, electrical conductivity and acidity on the soil’s carbon sequestration ability via two species of tamarisk (Tamarix Spp.). Environ Prog Sustain Energy 38(2019):6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13230
Jafari-Haghighi M (2003) Methods of soil analysis, sampling and important physical and chemical properties with an emphasis on theoretical and applied principles. Tehran University Press, Tehran
Johnston M, Homann P, Engstrom J, Grigal D (1996) Changes in ecosystem carbon storage over 40 years on an old-field/forest landscape in east-central Minnesota. For Ecol Manag 83:17–26
Kilbride CM, Byrne KA, Gardiner JJ (1999) Carbon Sequestration & Irish Forests. COFORD, National Council for Forests and Development
Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1–22
Mahdavi SK, Sandgol A, Azarnivand H, BabaieiKhafaki S, Jafari M, Mahdavi F (2009) Evaluating the distribution density of Atriplex lentiformis in natural habitats and their ability of carbon sequestration in comparison with the distribution density of Atriplex species cultivated in projects of rangeland restoration (a case study of Isfahan). Plant Ecosys 17:19–29
Nelson PN, Rahman BA, Oades JM (1997) Sodicity and clay type: influence on decomposition of added organic matter. Soil Soc America J 61:1052–1057
Nosetto MD, Jobbagy EG, Paruelo JM (2006) Carbon sequestration in semi-arid rangelands: comparison of Pinus ponderosa plantations and grazing exclusion in NW Patagonia. J Arid Environ 67:142–156
Parsamanesh S, Sadeghi H (2019) The phytoremediation effect of Medicago scutellata (L.) mill. On soils under cd-water stress: a good choice for contaminated drylands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:29065–29073
Paul KI, Polglase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, Khanna PK (2002) Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For Ecol Manag 168:241–257
Petite JR, Jouzel J, Raynaud M, Barnola M, Chappelaz J, Davis M, Delayque M, Katlyakov M, Legrand M, Lipenkov V, Lorius C, Pepin L, Ritz C, Saltzman E, Stievenard M (1999) Climate and atmospheric history of past 420000 years from the Vostock ice core. Antarctica Nature 399:429–436
Rice, C W (2000) Soil organic C and N in rangeland soils under elevation CO2 and land management. Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurements, and Monitoring Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina, October, 3–5
Sadeghi H, Ghasemi Nejad Raeini M (2016) Estimation and comparison of carbon sequestration by: Zygophyllum atriplicoides and Gymnocarpus decander. Clean Soil, Air, Water 44:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20140063
SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s guide. SAS Publishing, Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc., pp 5136
Schoeneberger MM (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agrofor Syst 75:27–37
Schuman GE, Janzen H, Herrick JE (2002) Soil carbon information and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environ Pollut 116:391–396
Sedjo RA (1989) Forests to offset the greenhouse effect. Forestry. 87:12–15
Setia R, Gottschalk P, Smith P, Marschner P, Baldock J, Setia D, Smith J (2013) Soil salinity decreased global soil organic carbon stocks. Sci Total Environ 465:267–272
Singh G, Singh NT (1993) Mesquite for revegetation of salt lands. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute Bulletin 18:20–26
Singh G, Bala N, Chaudhuri KK, Meena RL (2003) Carbon sequestration potential of common access resources in arid and semi-arid regions of northwestern India. Indian Forester 129:859–864
Skyllberg U (1991) Seasonal variation of PHH2O and PHCaCl2 in centimeter-layers of mor humus in a Piceaabies (L.) karst. Stand. Scandinavian J Forest Res 6:3–18
Su YZ (2007) Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration following the conversion of cropland to alfalfa forage land in northwest China. Soil Tillage Res 92:181–189
UNDP (2000) Carbon sequestration in the desertified rangelands of Hossain-Abad through community based management program coordination. PP. 1–7
Varamesh S, Hosseini SM, Abdi N, Akbariniya M (2009) The effects of forestry on increasing carbon sequestration and improving soil characteristics. Association of Forestry of Iran 2:25–35
Varamesh S, Hosseini SM, Abdi N (2010) Urban forests and their capability in the sequestration of atmospheric carbon. Association of Forestry of Iran 2(1):25–35
Vural A (2018) Relationship between the geological environment and element accumulation capacity of Helichrysum arenarium. Arab J Geosci 11:258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3609-0
Vural A (2015) Biogeochemical characteristics of Rosa canina grown in hydrothermally contaminated soils of the Gümüşhane Province, Northeast Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 187:486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4708-y
Wan Y, Lin E, Xiong W, Li Y (2010) Modeling the impact of climate change on soil organic carbon stock in upland soils in the 21th century in Chaina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:23–31
Woomer PL, Tourc A, Sall M (2004) Carbon stocks in Senegal’s Sahel transition zone. Arid Environ 59:499–510
Yan H, Cao M, Liu J, Tao B (2007) Potential and sustainability for carbon sequestration with improved soil management in agricultural soils of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:325–335
Zhao HL, He YH, Zhou RL, Su YZ, Li YQ, Drake S (2009) Effects of desertification on soil organic C and N content in sandy farmland and grassland of Inner Mongolia. Catena. 77:187–191
Funding
The authors received financial support from the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, to conduct the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Ficus carica are two of the most important species
• The management factors affect the carbon sequestration process
• The highest amount of stored carbon was found in stem tissues
• The highest carbon sequestration was obtained in soil at 0-–15-cm depth
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pazhavand, Z., Sadeghi, H. Using fig and eucalyptus for ecosystem restoration and management: good choices with carbon storage ability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 31615–31622 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09169-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09169-2