Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chemical and ecotoxicological assessment of sludge-based biosolids used for corn field fertilization

  • Environmental Toxicity Assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in a World of Arising Threats
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sludge-based biosolids can be used for crop fertilization and for soil enrichment with organic matter. The prerequisites for their application are laid out in 86/278/EEC which sets limits for metals of toxicological concern in the biosolid and in the recipient soil. In this context, three kinds of sludge-based biosolids from a municipal wastewater treatment plant were submitted to the leaching tests EN 12457-2 and ΝΕΝ 7341. The leachates were examined for their physicochemical, chemical, and ecotoxicological characteristics four times within a year. Even in the more aggressive metal leaching method (ΝΕΝ 7341), results were much lower than the limits set in Council Directive 86/278/EEC. Correlations were noted between numerous parameters and principal component analysis grouped them in 3 components explaining 76% of total variation. These leaching tests were also performed on soil-biosolid samples from another investigative research in which two of the three kinds of biosolids had been incorporated in corn fields at doses 0, 20, and 40 tn/ha. EN 12457-2 leaching tests indicated that Ni and Cd leaching was affected by biosolid incorporation in soil, in relation to the type of the receiving soil (clay or sand). The leachates from the soil-biosolid mixtures were practically not toxic for the organisms tested (D. magna, V. fischeri, higher plants). In summary the biosolids were considered of low environmental risk when utilized in the field. A detailed risk assessment encompassing both chemical and ecotoxicological analysis is necessary for integrated evaluation of biosolids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUT:

Autumn

LM:

Limed biosolid

DH:

Dehydrated biosolid

LM_Clay:

Limed biosolid clay soil

DH_Clay:

Dehydrated biosolid clay soil

LM_EN:

Limed biosolid EN 12457-2 leaching

DH_EN:

Dehydrated biosolid EN 12457-2 leaching

LM_NEN:

Limed biosolid NEN 7341 leaching

DH_NEN:

Dehydrated biosolid NEN 7341 leaching

LM_Sand:

Limed biosolid sandy soil

DH_Sand:

Dehydrated biosolid sandy soil

SPR:

Spring

DR:

Dried biosolid

SUM:

Summer

DR_EN:

Dried biosolid EN 12457-2 leaching

WINT:

Winter

DR_NEN:

Dried biosolid NEN 7341 leaching

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was funded by EYATH S.A. (contract number: RC AUTH 97019).

Mr Giannakis’ scholarship: a«This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme «Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning» in the context of the project “Strengthening Human Resources Research Potential via Doctorate Research” (MIS-5000432), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ)»

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Emmanouil.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannakis, I., Emmanouil, C., Mitrakas, M. et al. Chemical and ecotoxicological assessment of sludge-based biosolids used for corn field fertilization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 3797–3809 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09165-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09165-6

Keywords

Navigation