Advertisement

Effective adsorption of zinc on magnetic nanocomposite of Fe3O4/zeolite/cellulose nanofibers: kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic study

  • Elmira S. Mirjavadi
  • Ramin M.A.TehraniEmail author
  • Ali Khadir
Research Article

Abstract

In this paper, the adsorption behavior of zinc onto magnetic zeolite/cellulose nanofibers (MZNF) was studied. The prepared adsorbent was characterized by SEM, FTIR, and VSM analyses. The mass ratio of adsorbent in composite, pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, initial Zn+2 concentration, temperature, and agitation speed were investigated in batch experiments. The results showed that zeolite played an important role in the prepared nanocomposite due to its great surface area. pH 7 exhibited the highest Zn+2 removal efficiency. Rapid adsorption at the first 30 min of the reaction is one of the advantages of the prepared adsorbents. Moreover, increase at temperature led to higher efficiency and maximum efficiency was attained at 30 °C. Under optimum conditions, MZNF showed removal efficiency of 96% and maximum adsorption capacity of 9.45 mg/g. The presence of the competing ions did not reduce the efficiency of the process and adsorption efficiency was higher than 93%. The calculated RSD of 1.42% exhibits the suitability of the process. Equilibrium data were examined by various isotherms and kinetics equations. It was concluded that Pseudo second-order model and Langmuir models described the adsorption process well. Based on these results, MZNF obtained in this work can be served as a promising candidate for Zn+2 removal in wastewater.

Keywords

Adsorption Zeolite Cellulose nanofibers Composite Magnetic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors also would like to extend the acknowledgments to Islamic Azad University, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Share Rey, and West Tehran Branches.

References

  1. Abdullah N, Tajuddin MH, Yusof N (2019) 10 - Forward osmosis (FO) for removal of heavy metals. In: Ahsan A, A.F.B.T. N. in W, Ismail WT (eds) Micro Nano Technol. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 177–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813902-8.00010-1 Google Scholar
  2. Afshar A, Sadjadi SAS, Mollahosseini A, Eskandarian MR (2016) Polypyrrole-polyaniline/Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Korean J Chem Eng 33:669–677.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0156-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguayo-Villarreal IA, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Hernández-Montoya V, Montes-Morán MA, Reynel H (2011) Batch and column studies of Zn2+ removal from aqueous solution using chicken feathers as sorbents.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.107
  4. Akin I, Arslan G, Tor A, Ersoz M, Cengeloglu Y (2012) Arsenic(V) removal from underground water by magnetic nanoparticles synthesized from waste red mud. J Hazard Mater 235–236:62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali S, Rehman SAU, Shah IA, Farid MU, An AK, Huang H (2019) Efficient removal of zinc from water and wastewater effluents by hydroxylated and carboxylated carbon nanotube membranes: behaviors and mechanisms of dynamic filtration. J Hazard Mater 365:64–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alyüz B, Veli S (2009) Kinetics and equilibrium studies for the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins. J Hazard Mater 167:482–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arcibar-Orozco JA, Flores-Rojas AI, Rangel-Mendez JR, Díaz-Flores PE (2018) Synergistic effect of zeolite/chitosan in the removal of fluoride from aqueous solution. Environ Technol:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1542033
  8. Arias M, Pérez-Novo C, López E, Soto B (2006) Competitive adsorption and desorption of copper and zinc in acid soils. Geoderma. 133:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aroua MK, Leong SPP, Teo LY, Yin CY, Daud WMAW (2008) Real-time determination of kinetics of adsorption of lead(II) onto palm shell-based activated carbon using ion selective electrode. Bioresour Technol 99:5786–5792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atieh MA (2011) Removal of zinc from water using modified and non-modified carbon nanofibers, 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  11. Azevedo A, Oliveira HA, Rubio J (2018) Treatment and water reuse of lead-zinc sulphide ore mill wastewaters by high rate dissolved air flotation. Miner Eng 127:114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beheshti F, Tehrani RMA, Khadir A (2019) Sulfamethoxazole removal by photocatalytic degradation utilizing TiO2 and WO3 nanoparticles as catalysts: analysis of various operational parameters. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02212-x
  13. Bekkouche S, Bouhelassa M, Salah NH, Meghlaoui FZ (2004) Study of adsorption of phenol on titanium oxide (TiO2). Desalination. 166:355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben Douissa N, Bergaoui L, Mansouri S, Khiari R, Mhenni MF (2013) Macroscopic and microscopic studies of methylene blue sorption onto extracted celluloses from Posidonia oceanica. Ind Crop Prod 45:106–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cadaval TRS, Dotto GL, Seus ER, Mirlean N, de Almeida Pinto LA (2016) Vanadium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto chitosan films. Desalin Water Treat 57:16583–16591.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1079741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cesur H, Balkaya N (2007) Zinc removal from aqueous solution using an industrial by-product phosphogypsum. Chem Eng J 131:203–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen Q, Yao Y, Li X, Lu J, Zhou J, Huang Z (2018a) Comparison of heavy metal removals from aqueous solutions by chemical precipitation and characteristics of precipitates. J Water Process Eng 26:289–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen X, Ren P, Li T, Trembly JP, Liu X (2018b) Zinc removal from model wastewater by electrocoagulation: processing, kinetics and mechanism. Chem Eng J 349:358–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Choi J-W, Yang K-S, Kim D-J, Lee CE (2009) Adsorption of zinc and toluene by alginate complex impregnated with zeolite and activated carbon. Curr Appl Phys 9:694–697.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2008.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chowdhury S, Mazumder MAJ, Al-Attas O, Husain T (2016) Heavy metals in drinking water: occurrences, implications, and future needs in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 569:476–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daoush W (2017) Co-precipitation and magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles for potential biomedical applications.  https://doi.org/10.15406/jnmr.2017.05.00118
  22. Dehghani MH, Dehghan A, Najafpoor A (2017) Removing Reactive Red 120 and 196 using chitosan/zeolite composite from aqueous solutions: kinetics, isotherms, and process optimization. J Ind Eng Chem 51:185–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dong Y, Lin H (2017) Competitive adsorption of Pb (II) and Zn (II) from aqueous solution by modified beer lees in a fixed bed column. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edelstein M, Ben-Hur M (2018) Heavy metals and metalloids: sources, risks and strategies to reduce their accumulation in horticultural crops. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 234:431–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Srivastava V, Suorsa V, Sillanpää M (2018) Removal of Cd2+, Ni2+ and PO4 3− from aqueous solution by hydroxyapatite-bentonite clay-nanocellulose composite. Int J Biol Macromol 118:903–912.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hui KS, Chao CYH, Kot SC (2005) Removal of mixed heavy metal ions in wastewater by zeolite 4A and residual products from recycled coal fly ash. J Hazard Mater 127:89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ji F, Li C, Tang B, Xu J, Lu G, Liu P (2012) Preparation of cellulose acetate/zeolite composite fiber and its adsorption behavior for heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 209:325–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanran N, Veemaraj T (2010) Adsorption behavior of zinc (II) ions and zinc (II)-EDTA complex from aqueous solution onto lemon peel and dates nut carbons - a comparative study. EJEAFChe 8:584-595.Google Scholar
  30. Karabulut S, Karabakan A, Denizli A, Yürüm Y (2000) Batch removal of copper (II) and zinc (II) from aqueous solutions with low-rank Turkish coals. Sep Purif Technol 18:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kardam A, Raj KR, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2014) Nanocellulose fibers for biosorption of cadmium, nickel, and lead ions from aqueous solution. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li X, Zhang D, Sheng F, Qing H (2018) Adsorption characteristics of copper (II), zinc (II) and mercury (II) by four kinds of immobilized fungi residues. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 147:357–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y, Bai P, Yan Y, Yan W, Shi W, Xu R (2019) Removal of Zn2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+ from aqueous solution by synthetic clinoptilolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 273:203–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lim HK, Teng TT, Ibrahim MH, Ahmad A, Chee HT (2012) Adsorption and removal of zinc (II) from aqueous solution using powdered fish bones. APCBEE Procedia 1:96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahmoodi NM, Saffar-Dastgerdi MH (2019) Zeolite nanoparticle as a superior adsorbent with high capacity: synthesis, surface modification and pollutant adsorption ability from wastewater. Microchem J 145:74–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malamis S, Katsou E (2013) A review on zinc and nickel adsorption on natural and modified zeolite, bentonite and vermiculite: examination of process parameters, kinetics and isotherms. J Hazard Mater 252:428–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meena AK, Mishra GK, Rai PK, Rajagopal C, Nagar PN (2005) Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using carbon aerogel as an adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 122:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mehta D, Mazumdar S, Singh SK (2015) Magnetic adsorbents for the treatment of water/wastewater—a review. J Water Process Eng 7:244–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mesquita ME, Silva JMV e Zinc adsorption by a calcareous soil. Copper interaction. Geoderma 69(1996):137–146Google Scholar
  40. Mohammadi A, Khadir A, Tehrani RMA (2019) Optimization of nitrogen removal from an anaerobic digester effluent by electrocoagulation process. J Environ Chem Eng:103195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103195
  41. Mollahosseini A, Toghroli M, Kamankesh M (2015) Zeolite/Fe3O4 as a new sorbent in magnetic solid-phase extraction followed by gas chromatography for determining phthalates in aqueous samples. J Sep Sci 38:3750–3757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mollahosseini A, Khadir A, Saeidian J (2019) Core–shell polypyrrole/Fe3O4 nanocomposite as sorbent for magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction of Al+3 ions from solutions: investigation of the operational parameters. J Water Process Eng 29:100795.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moussout H, Ahlafi H, Aazza M, Maghat H (2018) Critical of linear and nonlinear equations of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order kinetic models. Karbala Int J Mod Sci 4:244–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2018.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mulana F, Muslim A, Mohibah M, Halim KHK (2018) Removal of zinc (II) ion from aqueous solution by adsorption onto activated palm midrib bio-sorbent. In: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. IOP Publishing, Bristol, p 12027Google Scholar
  45. Nassar NN (2010) Rapid removal and recovery of Pb(II) from wastewater by magnetic nanoadsorbents. J Hazard Mater 184:538–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ning P, Qiu J, Wang X, Liu W, Chen W (2013) Metal loaded zeolite adsorbents for hydrogen cyanide removal. J Environ Sci 25:808–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60138-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Noulas C, Tziouvalekas M, Karyotis T (2018) Zinc in soils, water and food crops. J Trace Elem Med Biol 49:252–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ojemaye MO, Okoh OO, Okoh AI (2018) Uptake of Zn2+ and As3+ from wastewater by adsorption onto imine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Water 10.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010036
  49. Olivera S, Muralidhara HB, Venkatesh K, Guna VK, Gopalakrishna K, Kumar Y (2016) Potential applications of cellulose and chitosan nanoparticles/composites in wastewater treatment: a review. Carbohydr Polym 153:600–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paul D (2017) Research on heavy metal pollution of river Ganga: a review. Ann Agrar Sci 15:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pehlivan E, Cetin S, Yanık BH (2006) Equilibrium studies for the sorption of zinc and copper from aqueous solutions using sugar beet pulp and fly ash. J Hazard Mater 135:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peña-Guzmán C, Ulloa-Sánchez S, Mora K, Helena-Bustos R, Lopez-Barrera E, Alvarez J, Rodriguez-Pinzón M (2019) Emerging pollutants in the urban water cycle in Latin America: a review of the current literature. J Environ Manag 237:408–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perić J, Trgo M, Vukojević Medvidović N (2004) Removal of zinc, copper and lead by natural zeolite—a comparison of adsorption isotherms. Water Res 38:1893–1899.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Phanthong P, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X, Xu G, Abudula A, Guan G (2018) Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers 1:32–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piri F, Mollahosseini A, khadir A, Hosseini MM (2019) Enhanced adsorption of dyes on microwave-assisted synthesized magnetic zeolite-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (5):103338Google Scholar
  56. Puranik PR, Paknikar KM (1997) Biosorption of lead and zinc from solutions using Streptoverticillium cinnamoneum waste biomass. J Biotechnol 55:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Puranik PR, Paknikar KM (1999) Influence of co-cations on biosorption of lead and zinc–a comparative evaluation in binary and multimetal systems. Bioresour Technol 70:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rai PK, Mishra A, Tripathi BD (2010) Heavy metal and microbial pollution of the river Ganga: a case study of water quality at Varanasi. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 13:352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rangabhashiyam S, Balasubramanian P (2018) Characteristics, performances, equilibrium and kinetic modeling aspects of heavy metal removal using algae. Bioresour Technol Reports 5:261-279Google Scholar
  60. Reddy DHK, Yun Y-S (2016) Spinel ferrite magnetic adsorbents: alternative future materials for water purification? Coord Chem Rev 315:90–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rodrigues DAS, Moura JM, Dotto GL, Cadaval TRS, Pinto LAA (2018) Preparation, characterization and dye adsorption/reuse of chitosan-vanadate films. J Polym Environ 26:2917–2924.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1171-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shahriari T, Nabi Bidhendi G, Mehrdadi N, Torabian A (2014) Effective parameters for the adsorption of chromium(III) onto iron oxide magnetic nanoparticle. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:349–356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0315-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheta AS, Falatah AM, Al-Sewailem MS, Khaled EM, Sallam ASH (2003) Sorption characteristics of zinc and iron by natural zeolite and bentonite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 61:127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00360-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shrestha S, Son G, Lee SH, Lee TG (2013) Isotherm and thermodynamic studies of Zn (II) adsorption on lignite and coconut shell-based activated carbon fiber. Chemosphere. 92:1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Siyal AA, Shamsuddin MR, Khan MI, Rabat NE, Zulfiqar M, Man Z, Siame J, Azizli KA (2018) A review on geopolymers as emerging materials for the adsorption of heavy metals and dyes. J Environ Manag 224:327–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suratman A, Kamalia NZ, Kusumawati WA (2016) Adsorption and desorption of Zn(II) and Cu(II) on Ca- alginate immobilized activated rice bran. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 107:12017.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/107/1/012017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tighadouini S, Radi S, Elidrissi A, Haboubi K, Bacquet M, Degoutin S, Zaghrioui M, Garcia Y (2019) Removal of toxic heavy metals from river water samples using a porous silica surface modified with a new β-ketoenolic host. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 10:262–273.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.10.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trgo M, Perić J (2003) Interaction of the zeolitic tuff with Zn-containing simulated pollutant solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 260:166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00042-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trujillo Hernandez J, Aragón-Muriel A, Tabares JA, Alcázar G, Bolaños A (2015) Preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and removal of methylene blue through adsorption. J Phys Conf 614:10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/614/1/012007
  70. Tu Y-J, You C-F, Chang C-K (2012) Kinetics and thermodynamics of adsorption for Cd on green manufactured nano-particles. J Hazard Mater 235:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Üçer A, Uyanik A, Aygün ŞF (2006) Adsorption of Cu (II), Cd (II), Zn (II), Mn (II) and Fe (III) ions by tannic acid immobilised activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 47:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walaszek M, Del Nero M, Bois P, Ribstein L, Courson O, Wanko A, Laurent J (2018) Sorption behavior of copper, lead and zinc by a constructed wetland treating urban stormwater. Appl Geochem 97:167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker GM, Hansen L, Hanna J-A, Allen SJ (2003) Kinetics of a reactive dye adsorption onto dolomitic sorbents. Water Res 37:2081–2089.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00540-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yazdani F, Seddigh M (2016) Magnetite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method: the effects of various iron anions on specifications. Mater Chem Phys 184:318–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.09.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yin K, Wang Q, Lv M, Chen L (2018) Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals. Chem Eng J 360:1553–1563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yisa J, Hussaina H, Tijani Oladejo J (2011) Application of adsorbent from dum palm for the removal of manganese (II), zinc (II), and copper (II) ions from aqueous solution. J Am Sci 7(10):226-230Google Scholar
  77. Yu X, Tong S, Ge M, Zuo J, Cao C, Song W (2013) One-step synthesis of magnetic composites of cellulose@iron oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal. J Mater Chem A 1:959–965.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00315E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zarei S, Niad M, Raanaei H (2018) The removal of mercury ion pollution by using Fe3O4-nanocellulose: synthesis, characterizations and DFT studies. J Hazard Mater 344:258–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elmira S. Mirjavadi
    • 1
  • Ramin M.A.Tehrani
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ali Khadir
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Young Researcher and Elite Club, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) Share Rey BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations