Abstract
This study investigated the applicability of self-forming hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) as a low-cost alternative to ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. A hollow fiber polyester fabric was used as a support material to form the DM layer. Submerged DM and UF hollow fiber membrane were placed in the same reactor in order to compare the treatment and filtration performance of each membrane. Morphological analyses were also carried out for DM surface. The system was operated continuously at a flux of 5 L/m2 h for 85 days. High COD removal efficiency and total suspended solids (TSS) rejection were achieved by the DM. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) of the DM was higher in comparison to the UF membrane, which was related with the formation of cake layer in DM. DM technology can be used as an alternative to UF membrane for municipal wastewater treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Shafy HI, Abdel-Shafy SH (2017) Membrane technology for water and wastewater management and application in Egypt. Egypt J Chem 60(3):347–360
Alavi Moghaddam MR, Satoh H, Mino T (2002) Effect of important operational parameters on performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 46(9):229–236
An Y, Wang Z, Wu Z, Yang D, Zhou Q (2009) Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 155(3):709–715
APHA (2005) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington
Chu L, Li S (2006) Filtration capability and operational characteristics of dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 51:173–179
Chu H, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Zhao Y, Dong B, Zhang H (2014) Dynamic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: operation, critical flux, and dynamic membrane structure. J Memb Sci 450:265–271
Croue´ JP, Benedetti MF, Violleau D, Leenheer JA (2003) Characterization and copper binding of humic and nonhumic organic matter isolated from South Platte River: evidence for the presence of nitrogenous binding site. Environ Sci Technol 37(2):328–336
Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ozturk I, Roest K, van Lier JB (2012) A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 122:196–206
Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, van Lier JB (2013) Effect of support material properties on dynamic membrane filtration performance. Sep Sci Technol 48(15):2263–2269
Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Tao Y, van Lier JB (2014) Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Water Res 48:420–429
Ersahin ME, Tao Y, Ozgun H, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2016) Characteristics and role of dynamic membrane layer in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 113(4):761–771
Ersahin ME, Tao Y, Ozgun H, Gimenez JB, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2017) Impact of anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor configuration on treatment and filterability performance. J Membr Sci 526:387–394
Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36(23):5245–5251
FAO (2016) AQUASTAT website. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/wastewater/index.stm. Website accessed on [2018/06/30]
Galinha CF, Sanches S, Crespo JG (2018) Fundamental modelling of membrane systems: membrane and process performance. Chapter 6. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 209–249
Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd S (2000) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18(2):119–130
Gao WJ, Lin HJ, Leung KT, Schraft H, Liao BQ (2011) Structure of cake layer in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 374:110–120
Hu Y, Wang XC, Yu ZZ, Ngo HH, Sun Q, Zhang Q (2016) New insight into fouling behavior and foulants accumulation property of cake sludge in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 510:10–17
Judd S (2011) The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, Oxford
Kiso Y, Jung YJ, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min KS (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34(17):4143–4150
Le Clech P, Jefferson B, Chang IS, Judd SJ (2003) Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 227(1–2):81–93
Lin HJ, Liao BQ, Chen JR, Gao WJ, Wang LM, Wang FY, Lu XF (2011) New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2373–2379
Liu H, Li Y, Yang C, Pu W, He L, Bo F (2012) Stable aerobic granules in continuous-flow bioreactor with self-forming dynamic membrane. Bioresour Technol 121:111–118
Liu Y, Chang S, Defersha FM (2015) Characterization of the proton binding sites of extracellular polymeric substances in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res 78:133–143
Loderer C, Wörle A, Fuchs W (2012) Influence of different mesh filter module configurations on effluent quality and long-term filtration performance. Environ Sci Technol 46(7):3844–3850
Madaeni SS, Fane AG, Wiley DE (1999) Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74(6):539–543
Maruyama T, Katoh S, Nakajima M, Nabetani H, Abbott TP, Shono A, Satoh K (2001) FT-IR analysis of BSA fouled on ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 192:201–207
Melin T, Jefferson B, Bixio D, Thoeye C, De Wilde W, De Koning J, van der Graff J, Wintgens T (2006) Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination 187:271–282
Meng F, Yang F, Xiao J, Zhang H, Gang Z (2006) A new insight into membrane fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. J Membr Sci 285(1–2):159–165
Meng F, Zhang H, Yang F, Liu L (2007) Characterization of cake layer in submerged membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol 41(11):4065–4070
Mutamim NSA, Noor ZZ, Hassan MAA, Olsson G (2012) Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: a performance review. Desalination 305:1–11
Ng AN, Kim AS (2007) A mini-review of modeling studies on membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for municipal wastewaters. Desalination 212(1–3):261–281
Poostchi AA, Mehrnia MR, Rezvani F, Sarrafzadeh MH (2012) Low-cost monofilament mesh filter used in membrane bioreactor process: filtration characteristics and resistance analysis. Desalination 286:429–435
Salerno C, Vergine P, Berardi G, Pollice A (2017) Influence of air scouring on the performance of a Self Forming Dynamic Membrane BioReactor (SFD MBR) for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 223:301–306
Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep Purif Technol 63(2):278–286
Tewari PK, Singh RK, Batra VS, Balakrishnan M (2010) Membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment: filtration performance evaluation of low cost polymeric and ceramic membranes. Sep Purif Technol 71(2):200–204
Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S (2009) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 43:2504–2512
Wang YK, Sheng GP, Li WW, Yu HQ (2012) A pilot investigation into membrane bioreactor using mesh filter for treating low-strength municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 122:17–21
Wu Y, Huang X, Wen X, Chen F (2005) Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 51(6–7):107–114
Xiong J, Fu D, Singh RP (2014) Self-adaptive dynamic membrane module with a high flux and stable operation for the municipal wastewater treatment. J Memb Sci 471:308–318
Yang W, Cicek N, Ilg J (2006) State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci 270:201–211
Yu Z, Hu Y, Dzakpasu M, Wang XC (2018) Thermodynamic prediction and experimental investigation of short-term dynamic membrane formation in dynamic membrane bioreactors: effects of sludge properties. J Environ Sci (in press)
Yurtsever A, Cinar O, Sahinkaya E (2016) Treatment of textile wastewater using sequential sulfate-reducing anaerobic and sulfide-oxidizing aerobic membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 511:228–237
Funding
This study was financed by Istanbul Technical University, Scientific Research Projects: Amr Mustafa Abdelrahman (Project No: MYL-2018-41219) and Onur Isik (Project No: MKD-2017-40987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isik, O., Abdelrahman, A.M., Ozgun, H. et al. Comparative evaluation of ultrafiltration and dynamic membranes in an aerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 32723–32733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04409-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04409-6