Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative evaluation of ultrafiltration and dynamic membranes in an aerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment

  • Green Approaches for Materials, Wastes and Effluents Treatment
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the applicability of self-forming hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) as a low-cost alternative to ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. A hollow fiber polyester fabric was used as a support material to form the DM layer. Submerged DM and UF hollow fiber membrane were placed in the same reactor in order to compare the treatment and filtration performance of each membrane. Morphological analyses were also carried out for DM surface. The system was operated continuously at a flux of 5 L/m2 h for 85 days. High COD removal efficiency and total suspended solids (TSS) rejection were achieved by the DM. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) of the DM was higher in comparison to the UF membrane, which was related with the formation of cake layer in DM. DM technology can be used as an alternative to UF membrane for municipal wastewater treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Shafy HI, Abdel-Shafy SH (2017) Membrane technology for water and wastewater management and application in Egypt. Egypt J Chem 60(3):347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi Moghaddam MR, Satoh H, Mino T (2002) Effect of important operational parameters on performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol 46(9):229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • An Y, Wang Z, Wu Z, Yang D, Zhou Q (2009) Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 155(3):709–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu L, Li S (2006) Filtration capability and operational characteristics of dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 51:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu H, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Zhao Y, Dong B, Zhang H (2014) Dynamic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: operation, critical flux, and dynamic membrane structure. J Memb Sci 450:265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croue´ JP, Benedetti MF, Violleau D, Leenheer JA (2003) Characterization and copper binding of humic and nonhumic organic matter isolated from South Platte River: evidence for the presence of nitrogenous binding site. Environ Sci Technol 37(2):328–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ozturk I, Roest K, van Lier JB (2012) A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 122:196–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, van Lier JB (2013) Effect of support material properties on dynamic membrane filtration performance. Sep Sci Technol 48(15):2263–2269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Tao Y, van Lier JB (2014) Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Water Res 48:420–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Tao Y, Ozgun H, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2016) Characteristics and role of dynamic membrane layer in anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 113(4):761–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin ME, Tao Y, Ozgun H, Gimenez JB, Spanjers H, van Lier JB (2017) Impact of anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor configuration on treatment and filterability performance. J Membr Sci 526:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan B, Huang X (2002) Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36(23):5245–5251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2016) AQUASTAT website. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/wastewater/index.stm. Website accessed on [2018/06/30]

  • Galinha CF, Sanches S, Crespo JG (2018) Fundamental modelling of membrane systems: membrane and process performance. Chapter 6. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 209–249

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd S (2000) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18(2):119–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao WJ, Lin HJ, Leung KT, Schraft H, Liao BQ (2011) Structure of cake layer in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 374:110–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Wang XC, Yu ZZ, Ngo HH, Sun Q, Zhang Q (2016) New insight into fouling behavior and foulants accumulation property of cake sludge in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 510:10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd S (2011) The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiso Y, Jung YJ, Ichinari T, Park M, Kitao T, Nishimura K, Min KS (2000) Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res 34(17):4143–4150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Clech P, Jefferson B, Chang IS, Judd SJ (2003) Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 227(1–2):81–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HJ, Liao BQ, Chen JR, Gao WJ, Wang LM, Wang FY, Lu XF (2011) New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2373–2379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li Y, Yang C, Pu W, He L, Bo F (2012) Stable aerobic granules in continuous-flow bioreactor with self-forming dynamic membrane. Bioresour Technol 121:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Chang S, Defersha FM (2015) Characterization of the proton binding sites of extracellular polymeric substances in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res 78:133–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loderer C, Wörle A, Fuchs W (2012) Influence of different mesh filter module configurations on effluent quality and long-term filtration performance. Environ Sci Technol 46(7):3844–3850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madaeni SS, Fane AG, Wiley DE (1999) Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74(6):539–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama T, Katoh S, Nakajima M, Nabetani H, Abbott TP, Shono A, Satoh K (2001) FT-IR analysis of BSA fouled on ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 192:201–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melin T, Jefferson B, Bixio D, Thoeye C, De Wilde W, De Koning J, van der Graff J, Wintgens T (2006) Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination 187:271–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Yang F, Xiao J, Zhang H, Gang Z (2006) A new insight into membrane fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. J Membr Sci 285(1–2):159–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Zhang H, Yang F, Liu L (2007) Characterization of cake layer in submerged membrane bioreactor. Environ Sci Technol 41(11):4065–4070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutamim NSA, Noor ZZ, Hassan MAA, Olsson G (2012) Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: a performance review. Desalination 305:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng AN, Kim AS (2007) A mini-review of modeling studies on membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for municipal wastewaters. Desalination 212(1–3):261–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poostchi AA, Mehrnia MR, Rezvani F, Sarrafzadeh MH (2012) Low-cost monofilament mesh filter used in membrane bioreactor process: filtration characteristics and resistance analysis. Desalination 286:429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salerno C, Vergine P, Berardi G, Pollice A (2017) Influence of air scouring on the performance of a Self Forming Dynamic Membrane BioReactor (SFD MBR) for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 223:301–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M (2008) Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Sep Purif Technol 63(2):278–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tewari PK, Singh RK, Batra VS, Balakrishnan M (2010) Membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment: filtration performance evaluation of low cost polymeric and ceramic membranes. Sep Purif Technol 71(2):200–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S (2009) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 43:2504–2512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YK, Sheng GP, Li WW, Yu HQ (2012) A pilot investigation into membrane bioreactor using mesh filter for treating low-strength municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol 122:17–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Huang X, Wen X, Chen F (2005) Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor. Water Sci Technol 51(6–7):107–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong J, Fu D, Singh RP (2014) Self-adaptive dynamic membrane module with a high flux and stable operation for the municipal wastewater treatment. J Memb Sci 471:308–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Cicek N, Ilg J (2006) State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J Membr Sci 270:201–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Hu Y, Dzakpasu M, Wang XC (2018) Thermodynamic prediction and experimental investigation of short-term dynamic membrane formation in dynamic membrane bioreactors: effects of sludge properties. J Environ Sci (in press)

  • Yurtsever A, Cinar O, Sahinkaya E (2016) Treatment of textile wastewater using sequential sulfate-reducing anaerobic and sulfide-oxidizing aerobic membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 511:228–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed by Istanbul Technical University, Scientific Research Projects: Amr Mustafa Abdelrahman (Project No: MYL-2018-41219) and Onur Isik (Project No: MKD-2017-40987).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onur Isik.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isik, O., Abdelrahman, A.M., Ozgun, H. et al. Comparative evaluation of ultrafiltration and dynamic membranes in an aerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 32723–32733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04409-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04409-6

Keywords

Navigation