Abstract
We conducted an experiment with two agricultural soils with acidic and alkaline pH levels to assess the effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles (nZnO) on the bacterial community. The effect of the nZnO concentrations (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 mg Zn/kg soil) and contact time between nanoparticles and soil (180 days) was considered. We measured the microbial respiration rate, nitrogen transformation, enzymatic activities (dehydrogenase (DH), acidic phosphatase (ACP), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), and the community-level physiological profile (CLPP) soil parameters. Respiration potential and nitrogen transformation were negatively affected only at the highest nZnO concentration. The changes in enzymatic activities were very variable with time and between both soils. A stimulating effect of the nanoparticles on microbial activity was clearly shown at 30 days after the nZnO application in both soils, except for the 1000 mg/kg in calcareous soil, after which time in the latter, the functional richness of the bacterial community was reduced to virtually zero. However, values of the enzymatic activities demonstrated that there was self-adaptation of microbial communities over the study period (180 days). The nZnO 1000 mg/kg dose produced an increase in bacterial growth in the acidic soil, without apparent changes in their metabolic profiles over time. A good correlation was found between microbial respiration rates (calcareous and acidic soils) and microbial metabolic activity (acidic soil) based on extracted Zn concentrations. Our findings suggest the necessity of additional studies to examine the effects of nZnO in natural microorganism populations in soil with different pH levels for extended periods of time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aon MA, Colaneri AC (2001) II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol 18:255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00161-5
Baalousha M (2009) Aggregation and disaggregation of iron oxide nanoparticles: influence of particle concentration, pH and natural organic matter. Sci Total Environ 407:2093–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.022
Bernhardt ES, Colman BP, Hochella MF, Cardinale BJ, Nisbet RM, Richardson CJ, Yin L (2010) An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment. J Environ Qual 39:1954–1965. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0479
Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, et al (2007) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Technical report. Central Science Laboratory. York. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=CB01098_6270_FRP
Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S et al (2006) Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett 6:866–870. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl052326h
Bruins MR, Kapil S, Oehme FW (2000) Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 45:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1999.1860
Christensen H, Hansen M, Sørensen J (1999) Counting and size classification of active soil bacteria by fluorescence in situ hybridization with an rRNA oligonucleotide probe. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1753–1761
Collins D, Luxton T, Kumar N, Shah S, Walker VK, Shah V (2012) Assessing the impact of copper and zinc oxide nanoparticles on soil: a field study. PLoS One 7:e42663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042663
Cornelis G, Hund-Rinke K, Kuhlbusch T, Van den Brink N, Nickel C (2014) Bioavailability of engineered nanoparticles in soils: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2720–2764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829767
Cox M, Lehninger AL, Nelson DR (2000) Lehninger principles of biochemistry. Worth Publishers, New York
Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannel JW (2002) Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:10494–10499. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142680199
Dalzell DJB, Alte S, Aspichueta E, de la Sota A, Etxebarria J, Gutierrez M, Hoffmann CC, Sales D, Obst U, Christofi N (2002) A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge. Chemosphere 47:535–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00331-9
Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1984) Kinetic parameters of phosphatases in soils and organic waste materials. Soil Sci 137:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198401000-00002
Donner E, Broos K, Heemsbergen D, Warne MSJ, McLaughlin MJ, Hodson ME, Nortcliff S (2010) Biological and chemical assessments of zinc ageing in field soils. Environ Pollut 158:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.06.034
Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1977) Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 9:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(77)90070-0
Farrah H, Pickering WF (1997) Influence of clay-solute interactions on aqueous heavy metal ion levels. Water Air Soil Pollut 8:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF002940422
Fernandez D, Garcia-Gomez C, Babin M (2013) In vitro evaluation of cellular responses induced by ZnO nanoparticles, zinc ions and bulk ZnO in fish cells. Sci Total Environ 452-453:262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.079
Fernandez-Calvino D, Rousk J, Brookes PC, Baath E (2011) Bacterial pH-optima for growth track soil pH, but are higher than expected at low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1569–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.007
Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:626–631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507535103
Freeman C, Liska G, Ostle NJ, Jones SE, Lock MA (1995) The use of fluorogenic substrates for measuring enzyme-activity in peatlands. Plant Soil 175:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02413020
Frenk S, Ben-Moshe T, Dror I, Berkowitz B, Minz D (2013) Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on microbial community structure and function in two different soil types. PLoS One 8:e84441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084441
Garcia-Gomez C, Babin M, Obrador A, Alvarez JM et al (2015) Integrating ecotoxicity and chemical approaches to compare the effects of ZnO nanoparticles, ZnO bulk, and ZnCl on plants and microorganisms in a natural soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:16803–16813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4867-y
Garland J (1996) Analytical approaches to the characterization of samples of microbial communities using patterns of potential c source utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 28:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00112-3
Garland JL, Mills AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level-sole-carbon-source-utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359
Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2011) Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103040t
Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2012) Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6749–6758. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00941-12
Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP (1998) Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1389–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00270-8
Heggelund LR, Diez-Ortiz M, Lofts S, Lahive E, Jurkschat K, Wojnarowicz J, Cedergreen N, Spurgeon D, Svendsen C (2014) Soil pH effects on the comparative toxicity of dissolved zinc, non-nano and nano ZnO to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Nanotoxicology 8:559–572. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2013.809808
Holden PA, Schimel JP, Godwin HA (2014) Five reasons to use bacteria when assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards and fates. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.008
Houba VJG, Temminghoff EJM, Gaikhorst GA, Vark W (2000) Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1299–1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620009370514
Huang PM, Wang MK, Chiu CY (2005) Soil mineral–organic matter–microbe interactions: impacts on biogeochemical processes and biodiversity in soils. Pedobiologia 49:609–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.006
Hund-Rinke K, Simon M (2008) Bioavailability assessment of contaminants in soils via respiration and nitrification tests. Environ Pollut 153:468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.08.003
Jiang W, Mashayekhi H, Xing B (2009) Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano-and micro-scaled oxide particles. Environ Pollut 157:1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.025
Jimenez MP, Horra A, Pruzzo L, Palma MR (2002) Soil quality: a new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters. Biol Fertil Soils 35:302–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0450-z
Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC (2008) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 279:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01012.x
Josko I, Oleszczu P, Futa B (2014) The effect of inorganic nanoparticles (ZnO, Cr2O3, CuO and Ni) and their bulk counterparts on enzyme activities in different soils. Geoderma 232-234:528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.06.012
Kim S, Kim J, Lee I (2011) Effects of Zn and ZnO nanoparticles and Zn2+ on soil enzyme activity and bioaccumulation of Zn in Cucumis sativus. Chem Ecol 27:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2010.529074
Kim S, Sin H, Lee S, Lee I (2013) Influence of metal oxide particles on soil enzyme activity and bioaccumulation of two plants. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1304.04084
Knight B, McGrath SP, Chaudri AM (1997) Biomass carbon measurements and substrate utilization patterns of microbial populations from soils amended with cadmium, copper, or zinc. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:39–43
Langdon KA, McLaughlin MJ, Kirby JK, Merrington G (2014) The effect of soil properties on the toxicity of silver to the soil nitrification process. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2543
Liao M, Xiao XM (2007) Effect of heavy metals on substrate utilization pattern, biomass, and activity of microbial communities in a reclaimed mining wasteland of red soil area. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 66:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.12.013
Menard A, Drobne D, Jemec A (2011) Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159:677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.027
Mudunkotuwa IA, Pettibone JM, Grassian VH (2012) Environmental implications of nanoparticle aging in the processing and fate of copper-based nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 46:7001–7010. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203851d
Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Landi L, Renella G (2011) Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. Phosphorus in action. Soil biology. Bünemann, Oberson, Frossard, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9_9
Negi H, Agarwal T, Zaidi MGH, Goel R (2012) Comparative antibacterial efficacy of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram negative bacteria. Ann Microbiol 62:765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0317-3
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2000a) Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Soil microorganisms, carbon transformation test. Test guideline N° 217. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/20745761
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2000b) Guidelines for testing of chemicals. Soil microorganisms, nitrogen transformation test. Test guideline N° 216. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2398
Peyrot C, Wilkinson KJ, Desrosiers M, Sauve S (2014) Effects of silver nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities with and without added organic matter. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2398
Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 14:1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9
Rahmatpour S, Shirvani M, Mosaddeghi MR, Nourbakhsh F, Bazarganipour M (2017) Dose–response effects of silver nano- particles and silver nitrate on microbial and enzyme activities in calcareous soils. Geoderma 285:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.006
Read DS, Matzke M, Gweon HS, Newbold LK, Heggelund L, Ortiz MD, Lahive E, Spurgeon D, Svendsen C (2016) Soil pH effects on the interactions between dissolved zinc, non-nano- and nano-ZnO with soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:4120–4128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4538-z
Roesch LF, Fulthorpe RR, Riva A, Casella G et al (2007) Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J 1:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2398
Rogers JE, Li SW (1985) Effect of metals and other inorganic-ions on soil microbial activity: soil dehydrogenase assay as a simple toxicity test. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34:858–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609817
Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL et al (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340–1351. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.58
Rousk J, Ackermann K, Curling SF, Jones DL (2012) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLoS One 7:e34197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034197
Sauve S, Hendershot W, Allen HE (2000) Solid-solution partitioning of metals in contaminated soils: dependence on pH, total metal burden, and organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 34:1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9907764
Schlich K, Hund-Rinke K (2015) Influence of soil properties on the effect of silver nanomaterials on microbial activity in five soils. Environ Pollut 196:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.10.021
Schloter M, Dilly O, Munch JC (2003) Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00085-9
Simon-Deckers A, Loo S, Mayne-L’hermite M, Herlin-Boime N et al (2009) Size-, composition-and shape- dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 43:8423–8429. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9016975
Simonin M, Richaume A (2015) Impact of engineered nanoparticles on the activity, abundance, and diversity of soil microbial communities: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:13710–13723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4171-x
Simonin M, Richaume A, Guyonnet JP, Dubost A, Martins JMF, Pommier T (2016) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles strongly impact soil microbial function by affecting archaeal nitrifiers. Sci Rep 6:33643. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33643
Simonin M, Martins JM, Le Roux X, Uzu G et al (2017) Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles on soil nitrification at environmentally relevant concentrations: lack of classical dose–response relationships. Nanotoxicology 11:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2017.1290845
Smolders E, Buekers J, Oliver I, McLaughlin MJ (2004) Soil properties affecting toxicity of zinc to soil microbial properties in laboratory-spiked and field-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2633–2640. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-27
Speir TW, Kettles HA, Parshotam A, Searle PL, Vlaar LNC (1995) A simple kinetic approach to derive the ecological dose value, ED50, for the assessment of Cr(VI) toxicity to soil biological properties. Soil Biol Biochem 27:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00231-O
Strachel R, Wyszkowska J, Bacmaga M (2017) The influence of nitrogen on the biological properties of soil contaminated with zinc. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 98:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1977-2
Tipping E, Rieuwerts J, Pan G, Ashmorec MR et al (2003) The solid–solution partitioning of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in upland soils of England and Wales. Environ Pollut 125:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00058-7
Tourinho PS, van Gestel CA, Lofts S, Soares AM, Loureiro S (2013) Influence of soil pH on the toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:2808–2815. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2369
Voet D, Voet JG, Pratt CW (2006) Fundamentals of biochemistry: life at the molecular level. Wiley, New York
Waalewijn-Kool PL, Ortiz MD, Lofts S, van Gestel CAM (2013) The effect of pH on the toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to Folsomia candida in amended field soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:2349–2355. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2302
Wang P, Menzies NW, Lombi E, McKenna BA et al (2013) Fate of ZnO nanoparticles in soils and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ Sci Technol 47:13822–13830. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403466p
Wang Q, Kang F, Gao Y, Mao X, Hu X (2016) Sequestration of nanoparticles by an EPS matrix reduces the particle-specific bactericidal activity. Sci Rep 6:21379–21389. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21379
Yao H, He Z, Wilson MJ, Campbell CD (2000) Microbial biomass and community structure in a sequence of soils with increasing fertility and changing land use. Microb Ecol 40:223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000053
Yu H, Si P, Shao W, Qiao X, Yang X, Gao D, Wang Z (2016) Response of enzyme activities and microbial communities to soil amendment with sugar alcohols. Microbiologyopen 5:604–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.355
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Carmen del Rio for the technical assistance provided.
Funding information
This work was financed by the Spanish projects RTA2013-00091-C02-01 and RTA2013-00091-C02-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Robert Duran
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García-Gómez, C., Fernández, M.D., García, S. et al. Soil pH effects on the toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to soil microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 28140–28152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2833-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2833-1