Abstract
Metal exposure to terrestrial organism is influenced by the reactivity of the solid-phase metal pool. Aging is one of the important factors that control the reactivity of the solid-phase metal pool in soil. In this study, the selected 13 soils were collected from different locations of China, representing different soil types. The reactivity variation of spiked Cu and Zn with aging was assessed in these 13 soils, and their comparative toxicity potentials (CTPs) were also calculated. The median reactive fractions (freactive) of Cu and Zn with 95% confidence intervals were 1.6 × 10−2 (3.5 × 10−6 to 2.2 × 10−1) and 0.10 (9.1 × 10−4 to 0.44) kgreactive/kgtotal, and the median CTPs for Cu and Zn were 2.09 (8.1 × 10−4 to 2.2 × 104) and 0.85 (8.5 × 10−4 to 7.2 × 102) m3/kg day, respectively. The statistical analysis indicated that aging variability in the CTP of Cu and Zn was mainly associated with the variability in soil organic carbon and pH. These results stress the importance of dealing with aging in the calculation of CTPs for terrestrial ecotoxicity of metals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amacher M (1991) Methods for obtaining and analyzing kinetic data. In: Sparks DL, Suarez DL (eds) Rates of soil chemical processes. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 19–59
Buekers J, Degryse F, Maes A, Smolders E (2008) Modelling the effects of ageing on Cd, Zn, Ni and Cu solubility in soils using an assemblage model. Eur J Soil Sci 59:1160–1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01053.x
Casey WH, Banfield JF, Westrich HR, McLaughlin L (1993) What do dissolution experiments tell us about natural weathering? Chem Geol 105:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(93)90115-Y
Crout NMJ, Tye AM, Zhang H, McGrath SP, Young SD (2006) Kinetics of metal fixation in soils: measurement and modeling by isotopic dilution. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:659–663. https://doi.org/10.1897/05-069r.1
Degryse F, Smolders E, Parker DR (2009) Partitioning of metals (Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) in soils: concepts, methodologies, prediction and applications—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 60:590–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01142.x
Frentiu T, Ponta M, Levei E, Cordos E (2009) Study of partitioning and dynamics of metals in contaminated soil using modified four-step BCR sequential extraction procedure. Chemical Paper 63(2):239–248. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-008-0102-3
Gandhi N, Diamond ML, van de Meent D, Huijbregts MAJ, Peijnenburg WJGM, Guinée J (2010) New method for calculating comparative toxicity potential of cationic metals in freshwater: application to copper, nickel, and zinc. Environ Sci Technol 44:5195–5201
Hamels F, Malevé J, Sonnet P, Kleja DB, Smolders E (2014) Phytotoxicity of trace metals in spiked and field-contaminated soils: linking soil extractable metals with toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2479–2487. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2693
Hamon RE, Parker DR, Lombi E (2008) Advances inisotopic dilution techniques in trace element research: a review of methodologies, benefits, and limitations. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Adv Agron, 99, 289–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00406-9
Henderson A, Hauschild M, van de Meent D, Huijbregts M, Larsen H, Margni M, McKone T, Payet J, Rosenbaum R, Jolliet O (2011) USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 16:701–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0316-4
Kim B, McBride MB (2008) Aging effects on partitioning coefficients of Cd, Cu and Zn in metal-spiked soils. J Korean Soc Soil Groundwater Environ 13(5):47–56
Kim R-Y, Yoon J-K, Kim T-S, Yang JE, Owens G, Kim K-R (2015) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils: definitions and practical implementation—a critical review. Environ Geochem Health 37:1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9695-y
Laird BD, Peak D, Siciliano SD (2011) Bioaccessibility of metal cations in soil is linearly related to its water exchange rate constant. Environ Sci Technol 45:4139–4144. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103710a
Liu AJ, Fang DM, Wang C, Li MH, Young RB (2015) Recovery of soil nitrification after long-term zinc exposure and its co-tolerance to Cu in different soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(1):314–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3338-1
Liu AJ, Li JX, Li MH, Niu XY, Wang J (2017) Toxicity assessment of binary metal mixtures (copper–zinc) to nitrification in soilless culture with the extended biotic ligand model. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 72(2):312–320
Lu RK (ed) (1999) Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry (in Chinese). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing
Ma YB, Lombi E, Oliver IW, Nolan AL, McLaughlin MJ (2006) Long-term aging of copper added to soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:6310–6317. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060306r
Ma Y, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ, Oliver IW, Nolan AL, Oorts K, Smolders E (2013) Aging of nickel added to soils as predicted by soil pH and time. Chemosphere 92:962–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.chemosphere.2013.03.013.
Martell AE (1971) Coordination chemistry, Vol. 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 186–263
Marzouk ER, Chenery SR, Young SD (2013) Predicting the solubility and lability of Zn, Cd, and Pb in soils from a mine spoil-contaminated catchment by stable isotopic exchange. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 123:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.09.004.
Oorts K, Ghesquiere U, Swinnen K, Smolders E (2006) Soil properties affecting the toxicity of CuCl2 and NiCl2 for soil microbial processes in freshly spiked soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:836–844. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-672R.1
Owsianiak M, Rosenbaum RK, Huijbregts MAJ, Hauschild MZ (2013) Addressing geographic variability in the comparative toxicity potential of copper and nickel in soils. Environ Sci Technol 47:3241–3250. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3037324
Owsianiak M, Veltman K, Hauschild MZ, Hendriks AJ, Steinmann ZJN, Huijbregts MAJ (2014) Elucidating differences in metal absorption efficiencies between terrestrial soft-bodied and aquatic species. Chemosphere 112:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.-05.024.
Owsianiak M, Holm PE, Fantke P, Christiansen KS, Borggaard OK, Hauschild MZ (2015) Assessing comparative terrestrial ecotoxicity of Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn: the influence of aging and emission source. Environ Pollut 206:400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.025
Reichenberg F, Mayer P (2006) Two complementary sides of bioavailability: accessibility and chemical activity of organic contaminants in sediments and soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1897/05-458R.1
Rodrigues SM, Henriques B, da Silva EF, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Romkens P (2010) Evaluation of an approach for the characterization of reactive and available pools of twenty potentially toxic elements in soils: part I—the role of key soil properties in the variation of contaminants’ reactivity. Chemosphere 81:1549–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.026
Ruyters S, Mertens J, Springael D (2012) Co-tolerance to zinc and copper of the soil nitrifying community and its relationship with the community structure. Soil Biol Biochem 44(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.017
Ruyters S, Springael D, Smolders E (2013) Recovery of soil ammonia oxidation after long-term zinc exposure is not related to the richness of the bacterial nitrifying community. Microb Ecol 66(3):312–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0210-7
Sarret G, Balesdent J, Bouziri L, Garnier JM, Marcus MA, Geoffroy N, Panfili F, Manceau A (2004) Zn speciation in the organic horizon of a contaminated soil by micro-x-ray fluorescence, micro- and powder-EXAFS spectroscopy, and isotopic dilution. Environ Sci Technol 38:2792–2801. https://doi.org/10.1021/es035171t
Smolders E, Buekers J, Oliver I, McLaughlin MJ (2004) Soil properties affecting toxicity of zinc to soil microbial properties in laboratory-spiked and field-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 2:2633–2640. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-27
Thakali S, Allen HE, Di Toro DM, Ponizovsky AA, Rooney CP, Zhao F-J, McGrath SP (2006) A terrestrial biotic ligand model. 1. Development and application to Cu and Ni toxicities to barley root elongation in soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:7085–7093. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061171s
Wendling LA, Ma YB, Kirby JK, McLaughlin MJ (2009) A predictive model of the effects of aging on cobalt fate and behavior in soil. Environ Sci Technol 43:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801322r.
Zhang H, Lombi E, Smolders E, McGrath S (2004) Kinetics of Zn release in soils and prediction of Zn concentration in plants using diffusive gradients in thin films. Environ Sci Technol 38:3608–3613. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0352597
Zhou R, Liu X, Luo L, Zhou Y, Wei J, Chen A, Tang L, Wu H, Deng Y, Zhang F, Wang Y (2017) Remediation of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd-contaminated agricultural soil using a combined red mud and compost amendment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 118:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.023
Funding
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 41671322; 41771348), the Shandong province Natural Fund (No. ZR2015DM010), and the SDUT & Zibo City Integration Development Project (NO. 2016ZBXC102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu
Key points
• It demonstrates that aging is an important factor for the accessibility of metals in spiked soils.
• It assessed aging influence on the terrestrial ecotoxicity potential of Cu and Zn in spiked soils.
• The multiple steps analysis indicated that aging variability in the CTP of Cu and Zn is mainly associated with the variability in soil organic carbon and pH.
• The results of this paper stress the importance of dealing with aging in the calculation of CTPs for terrestrial ecotoxicity of metals.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM1
(DOC 101 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, A., Liao, Q., Li, M. et al. The influence of aging on the comparative terrestrial ecotoxicity potential of copper and zinc in soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 28094–28101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2704-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2704-9