Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 18, pp 17283–17288 | Cite as

The ecological competition and grazing reverse the effects of sulfamethoxazole on plankton: a case study on characterizing community-level effect

  • Changyou Wang
  • Shengkang Liang
  • Yong Zhang
Research Article


The toxic effects of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) on densities of two algae, Platymonas helgolandica var. tsingtaoensis, Isochrysis galbana, and of a rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis, were tested by the population and community experiments. Two endpoints, the carrying capacity and the densities array of community in steady state (DACS), were used to characterize the toxic effects at a population level and a community one, respectively. The results showed that the carrying capacity of P. helgolandica var. tsingtaoensis and B. plicatilis did not decline significantly in population test when the concentration of SMX was lower than 6.0 mg L−1 and 12.0 mg L−1, respectively. However, I. galbana was sensitive to SMX and had presented toxic effect at 3.0 mg L−1. By extrapolation of toxic effect at a population level to a community one, a derived community-NOEC was 3.0 mg L−1, representing an inference from data of toxic effects at population level. In community experiment, when the customized community was in steady state, the density of I. galbana increased as a whole with SMX concentration in the range of tested concentration (0–144 mg L−1), while that of P. helgolandica var. tsingtaoensis assumed the trend of a reversed “v” in this range. Only the density of B. plicatilis decreased with SMX concentration. With the DACS as endpoint, a NOEC for the customized community was determined to be 6.0 mg L−1. This indicates that interspecific interactions can reverse the toxic effects of SMX on phytoplankton. The DACS was reliable and stable, serving as the endpoints in assessment of the effects of the pollutants on the ecosystems.


Interspecific interaction Sulfamethoxazole Ecotoxicology Antibiotics Endpoints 


Funding information

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program, China (Project No. 2016YFC1402101), the State Scholarship for study abroad, China (No. 201704180038), and the government Scholarship from Jiangsu Province, China for study abroad, the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).


  1. ASTM E1440-91 (2012) Standard guide for acute toxicity test with the rotifer Brachionus. ASTM International [S], West Conshohocken, PA Google Scholar
  2. Baran W, Sochacko J, Wardas W (2006) Toxicity and biodegradability of sulfonamides and products of their photocatalytic degradation in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 65:1295–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabecinhas AS, Novais SC, Santos SC, Rodrigues ACM, Pestana JLT, Soares AM, Lemos MFL (2015) Sensitivity of the sea snail Gibbula umbilicalis to mercury exposure—linking endpoints from different biological organization levels. Chemosphere 119:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter SR (1989) Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 70(2):453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen LX, Meng XZ, Jiao JJ (2009) Biodynamics. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Amer Statist Assoc 50(12):1096–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparison with a control. Biometrics 20:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eguchi K, Nagase H, Ozawa M, Endoh YS, Goto K, Hirata K, Miyamoto K, Yoshimura H (2004) Evaluation of antimicrobial agents for veterinary use in the ecotoxicity test using microalgae. Chemosphere 57:1733–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang K, Tang X, Zhang J, Wang Y (2013) Effects of different species and densities of marine bait microalgae on feeding of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis neonates. Mar Environ Sci 32(4):497–501Google Scholar
  10. Feng L (2006) Effects of UV-B radiation on experimental population dynamics and interspecific competition of two species of marine rotifers (B. plicatilis & B. urceus) [D]. Ocean University of China, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng C, Wu F, Zhao X, Li H, Chang H (2012) Water quality criteria research and progress. Sci China Earth Sci 5:646–656Google Scholar
  12. Feng CL, Zhao XL, Hou H, Huang W, Song J, Li H, Meng W, Wu F (2015) Research progress and main scientific problems of theory and methodology of China’s environmental quality criteria. Asian J Ecotoxicol 10(1):2–17Google Scholar
  13. Fu B, Yue L, Feng D, Li F, Yu H, Ge C (2015) Inhibitory effect of combined pollution of enrofloxacin and Cu on root and shoot elongation of cabbage and tomato. Asian J Ecotoxicol 10(5):157–163Google Scholar
  14. Gao L, Shi Y, Li W, Liu J, Cai Y (2013) Environmental behavior and impacts of antibiotics. Environ Chem 32(9):1619–1633Google Scholar
  15. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China (AQSIQ) (2008) GB/T 21805–2008, Chemicals—alga growth inhibition test [S]. Standards Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  16. Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Nardelli A, Pascarella L, Parrella A (2005) Toxic and genotoxic evaluation of six antibiotics on non-target organisms. Sci Total Environ 346(1–3):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin X, Wang Y, Jin W, Rao K, John P, Hollert G, Richardson K, Wang Z (2014) Ecological risk of nonylphenol in China surface waters based on reproductive fitness. Environmental Science & Technology 48(2):1256–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joakim Larsson DG (2014) Antibiotics in the environment. Ups J Med Sci 119(2):108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laender FD, Schamphelaere KACD, Vanrolleghem PA, Janssen CR (2008) Comparison of different toxic effect sub-models in ecosystem modelling used for ecological effect assessments and water quality standard setting [J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 69:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lananan F, Jusoh A, Ali N, Lam SS, Endut A (2013) Effect of Conway medium and f/2 medium on the growth of six genera of South China Sea marine microalgae. Bioresour Technol 141:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Y (2008) Global asymptotic stability of the Lotka-Volterra mixed system for four species. J Hefei Univ Technol 31(9):1532–1534Google Scholar
  22. Li L, Zhu XM, Wu HY (2011) Feeding of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis enriched with microalgae [J]. Chin J Ecol 30(9):2019–2025Google Scholar
  23. Li YN, Gao X, An XL, Liu W, Li G, Hou J, Chen J (2013) Oxidation stress of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) on Polychaete Tubifex. Asian J Ecotoxicol 8(4):595–601Google Scholar
  24. Liu J, Wang L, Liu J, Shi L, Chen W, Shen SA (2015) Microcosm study compared to the species sensitivity distribution approach: a case study with the copper ion. Asian J Ecotoxicol 10(4):34–46Google Scholar
  25. Ma S (2013) Toxicity of crude oil and four kinds of dispersants to P.helgolandica and N.closterium [D]. Ocean University of China, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  26. Meng W, Yan ZG, Liu ZT (2009) Analysis of guideline s for deriving water quality criteria in the United States and construction of related criteria in China. Research of. Environ Sci 22(7):757–761Google Scholar
  27. Prado R, García R, Rioboo, Herrero C, Abalde J, Cid A (2009) Comparison of the sensitivity of different toxicity test endpoints in a microalga exposed to the herbicide paraquat. Environ Int 35(2):240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seth CS, Misra V, Chauhan LKS, Singh RR (2008) Genotoxicity of cadmium on root meristem cells of Allium cepa: cytogenetic and Comet assay approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71(3):711–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steele JH (1974) The structure of marine ecosystems [M]. Oxford. Blackwell Scientific Publication, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Su J (2011) Population growth and interspecific competition of marine microalgae and their response to enhanced Cd2+: a study based on flow cytometry. [D]. Ocean University of China, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun YY, Sun LQ, Wang CH (2005) Study on the growth of Isochrysis galbana. Mar Sci Bull 24(3):92–96Google Scholar
  32. Wang C, Li H, Wang X, Zhang Y (2011) Estimating toxic effect of copper on population of microalgae through a three-dimensional toxic effect growth model. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang C, Zhang Y, Li H, Xing W, Yu H (2015a) The effects of petroleum hydrocarbons on algae can be reversed in the presence of a primary consumer [J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology 95(3):344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang CY, Liang S, Guo W, Yu H, Xing W (2015b) Pollutant threshold concentration determination in marine ecosystems using an ecological interaction endpoint. Environ Pollut 204:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang C, Su R, Zhang Y, Liu G (2016) A method linking the toxic effects at community-level with contaminant concentrations. Sci Total Environ 569–570:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang C, Wang Z, Yong Z, Su R (2017) Interspecies interactions reverse the hazard of antibiotics exposure: a plankton community study on responses to ciprofloxacin hydrochloride [J]. Sci Rep 7(1):1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu D (2008) Combined effect of interspecies, feeding and UV-B stress on experimental population dynamics of Skeletonema costatum [D]. Ocean University of China, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu J, Wang N, Kong DY, Kong X, Shan Z (2015) Bioconcentration of sulfonamide antibiotics in zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) and model prediction assessment. Asian J Ecotoxicol 10(5):82–88Google Scholar
  39. Yang X, Lu G, Liu J, Yan Z (2013) Multigenerational chronic effects of pharmaceuticals on Daphnia magna at environmentally relevant concentrations. China Environ Sci 33(3):538–545Google Scholar
  40. Zhang Q, Xin Q, Zhu J, Cheng J (2014) The antibiotic contaminations in the main water bodies in China and the associated environmental and human health impacts. Environ Chem 33(7):1075–1083Google Scholar
  41. Zhao L, Wang D, Yin P, Li Q, Wu N (2012) Tolerance of two red-tide algae to sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxazole. Mar Environ Sci 31:6–10Google Scholar
  42. Zhao X, Zhao T, Li H, Huo S, Xu J, Feng C, Xu Y, Duan X, Wang T, Hou H, Meng W, Wu F (2015) Investigation on important directions of China environmental quality criteria. Asian J Ecotoxicol 10(1):18–30Google Scholar
  43. Zhou WL (2005) The studies on ingestion, reproduction and population dynamics of Brachionus plicatilis [D]. Ocean University of China, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  44. Zou S, Xu W, Zhang R, Tang J, Chen Y, Zhang G (2011) Occurrence and distribution of antibiotics in coastal water of the Bohai Bay, China: impacts of river discharge and aquaculture activities. Environ Pollut 159(10):2913–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Marine SciencesNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Jiangsu Research Center for Ocean Survey TechnologyNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of EducationQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Institute of Marine Science and TechnologyShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations