Assessment of toxicity of heavy metal-contaminated soils toward Collembola in the paddy fields supported by laboratory tests
Effects on soil Collembola of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd pollution from Cu smelters over 40 years were investigated in paddy fields from an area of Eastern China. We compared the field effects to those observed in single-species laboratory tests employing the hemiedaphic collembolan Folsomia candida and the epedaphic Sinella curviseta obtained from laboratory cultures and exposed to field-collected polluted soil. The results indicated that different collembolan species responded differently to the pollution in the fields and could be divided into sensitive, indifferent, and tolerant types accordingly. The abundance of sensitive species decreased as the pollution increased, but this was not the same for indifferent and tolerant species. The dominant species changed from sensitive to tolerant species as the pollution increased. The reproduction of F. candida and S. curviseta was most sensitive to the contaminated soil compared to growth and survival; the sensitivity of the two species was similar. The growth was more sensitive than the survival for F. candida but not for S. curviseta. The growth and survival of F. candida were much more sensitive than those of S. curviseta. Sensitivity of field populations of F. candida (EC10 31 [15–46]) and hemiedaphic species Folsomia quadrioculata (EC10 52 [0.7–102]) were comparable with sensitivity of the reproduction of F. candida in the single-species tests (EC10 21 [14–27]), suggesting that single-species test based on laboratory cultures and field soil could be used to link laboratory and field data and then reflect the field situation. S. curviseta could be used as an epedaphic species in single-species tests and F. quadrioculata as an indicator species for assessment of field effect.
KeywordsPollution Cu/Zn/Pb/Cd Springtail Species composition Sensitivity Single-species test
We thank Dr. Yan Gao for Collembola identification.
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271264 and 41325003).
- Bruce LJ, McCracken DI, Foster GN, Aitken MN (1997) The effects of cadmium and zinc-rich sewage sludge on epigeic Collembola populations. Pedobiologia 41:167–172Google Scholar
- Bruce L, McCracken D, Foster G, Aitken M (1999) The effects of sewage sludge on grassland euedaphic and hemiedaphic collembolan populations. Pedobiologia 43:209–220Google Scholar
- Christiansen K, Bellinger P (1980–1981) The Collembola of North America north of the Rio Grande. Grinnell College, GrinnellGoogle Scholar
- Dai W, Ke X, Li Z, Gao M, Wu L, Chiristie P, Luo Y (2018) Antioxidant enzyme activities of Folsomia candida and avoidance of soil metal contamination. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0489-x
- Filser J (1995) Collembola as indicators for long-term effects of intensive management. Acta Zool Fenn 196:326–328Google Scholar
- Fjellberg A (1998) The Collembola of Fennoscandia and Denmark, part I, Poduromorpha. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica. Brill Academic, Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Hågvar S (1994) Log-normal distribution of dominance as an indicator of stressed soil microarthropod communities. Acta Zool Fenn 195:71–80Google Scholar
- Haimi J, SiiraPietikainen A (1996) Decomposer animal communities in forest soil along heavy metal pollution gradient. Fresenius J Anal Chem 354:672–675Google Scholar
- Hopkin SP, Spurgeon DJ (2001) Forecasting the environmental effects of zinc, the metal of benign neglect in soil ecotoxicology. Forecast Environ Fate Eff Chem, Ecological and Environmental Toxicology Series 91–96Google Scholar
- ISO (2014) Soil quality—inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil contaminants (ISO 11267:2014) vol ISO/TC 190/SC 4. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Krogh PH (1991) Perturbation of the soil microarthropod community with the pesticides benomyl and isofenphos: I. Population changes. Pedobiologia 35:71–88Google Scholar
- OECD (2004) Test no. 222: earthworm reproduction test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, FranceGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2009) Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Test no. 232, Collembolan reproduction test in soil. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc.(2004) Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- van Gestel CAM, van der Waarde JJ, Derksen JGM(A), van der Hoek EE, Veul MFXW, Bouwens S, Rusch B, Kronenburg R, Stokman GNM (2001) The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1438–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wiles JA, Krogh PH (1998) Tests with the collembolans Isotoma viridis, Folsomia candida and Folsomia fimetaria. In: Løkke H, van Gestel CAM (eds) Handbook of soil invertebrate toxicity tests. Wiley, Chichester, pp 131–156Google Scholar
- Yin WY (2000) Soil animals in China. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Yosii R (1977) Critical check list of the Japanese species of Collembola. Contrib Biol Lab Kyoto Univ 25:141–170Google Scholar