Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 16, pp 15896–15908 | Cite as

Nitrogen fertilizer in combination with an ameliorant mitigated yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from a coastal saline rice field in southeastern China

  • Liying Sun
  • Yuchun Ma
  • Bo Li
  • Cheng Xiao
  • Lixin Fan
  • Zhengqin Xiong
Research Article

Abstract

Coastal saline rice fields play an increasingly important role in rice production and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, few studies investigated the influences of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and soil ameliorant on GHG emissions simultaneously in this region. Thus, a field experiment was established to study the effects of different N fertilizers and soil ameliorant on global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GHG intensity (GHGI) after accounting for carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), agrochemical inputs, and farm operations along with agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) during the rice season of 2016 in a coastal saline paddy in Lianyungang, China. The experiment was initiated with four N treatments (N0, no N; Nu, urea; Nm, organic-inorganic mixed fertilizer; Nw, organic fertilizer made from wheat straw) and two ameliorant (A) treatments (A0, no ameliorant; A1, 22.5 kg ha−1 ameliorant). The results showed that three N fertilizers significantly increased the CH4 emissions, N2O emissions, GWP, and grain yield by 42.2% (p < 0.001), 57.1% (p < 0.001), 49.8% (p < 0.001), and 58.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. NuA1, NmA1, and NwA1 treatments obviously reduced the yield-scaled GHGI by 21.3%, 16.3%, and 12.4%, respectively, relative to the corresponding NuA0, NmA0, and NwA0 treatments. Overall, although three N fertilizers would increase the GWP, combining an ameliorant amendment with N fertilizer can effectively reduce the yield-scaled GHGI and meanwhile increase the grain yield, particularly the NmA1 strategy.

Keywords

Nitrogen fertilizer Ameliorant Nitrogen use efficiency Coastal rice paddy Global warming potential 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate the anonymous reviewers and P. Garrigues for the critical and valuable comments to help improve this manuscript.

Funding information

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501245, 41601233), the Open Project of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agrivultural Meteorology (JKLAM1705), the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST (2014r050), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20140990), and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture (Y20160034).

References

  1. Baldwin DS, Rees GN, Mitchell AM, Watson G, Williams J (2006) The short-term effects of salinization on anaerobic nutrient cycling and microbial community structure in sediment from a freshwater wetland. Wetlands 26:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger S, Jang I, Seo J, Kang H, Gebauer G (2013) A record of N2O and CH4 emissions and underlying soil processes of Korean rice paddies as affected by different water management practices. Biogeochemistry 115:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brye KR, Nalley LL, Tack JB, Dixon BL, Barkley AP, Rogers CW (2016) Factors affecting methane emissions from rice production in the Lower Mississippi river valley, USA. Geoderma Reg 7:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai Z, Shan Y, Xu H (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on CH4 emissions from rice fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson KM, Gerber JS, Mueller ND, Herrero M, MacDonald GK, Brauman KA et al (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat Clim Chang 7:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark GJ, Dodgshun N, Pwg S, Tang C (2007) Changes in chemical and biological properties of a sodic clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2806–2817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craft C, Clough J, Ehman J, Joye S, Park R, Pennings S, Guo H, Machmuller M (2009) Forecasting the effects of accelerated sealevel rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 7:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Datta A, Yeluripati JB, Nayak DR, Mahata KR, Santra SC, Adhya TK (2013) Seasonal variation of methane flux from coastal saline rice field with the application of different organic manures. Atmos Environ 66:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding W, Cai Z, Tsuruta H, Li X (2003) Key factors affecting spatial variation of methane emissions from freshwater marshes. Chemosphere 51:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong WJ, Guo J, Xu LJ, Song ZF, Zhang J, Tang A (2017) Water regime-nitrogen fertilizer incorporation interaction: field study on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice agroecosystem in Harbin, China. J Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.007
  11. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2009) High-level expert forum: how to feed the world in 2050. Agricultural development economics division, economic and social development department, Rome, Italy pp, 4Google Scholar
  12. Fukumoto Y, Suzuki K, Kuroda K, Waki M, Yasuda T (2011) Effects of struvite formation and nitratation promotion on nitrogenous emissions such as NH3, N2O and NO during swine manure composting. Bioresour Technol 102:1468–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh S, Majumdar D, Jain MC (2003) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from an irrigated rice of North India. Chemosphere 51:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grassini P, Eskridge KM, Cassman KG (2013) Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nat Commun 4:2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hao X, Chang C, Larney FJ (2004) Carbon, nitrogen balances and greenhouse gas emission during cattle feedlot manure composting. J Environ Qual 33:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashim MMA, Yusop MK, Othman R, Wahid SA (2015) Characterization of nitrogen uptake pattern in Malaysian rice MR219 at different growth stages using 15N isotope. Rice Sci 22:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang Y, Zou J, Zheng X, Wang Y, Xu X (2004) Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by amendment of plant residues with different C:N ratios. Soil Biol Biochem 36:973–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inubushi K, Barahona MA, Yamakawa K (1999) Effects of salts and moisture content on N2O emission and nitrogen dynamics in yellow soil and Andosol in model experiments. Biol Fertil Soils 29:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Islam SF, van Groenigen JW, Jensen LS, Sander BO (2018) The effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies without compromising yield by early-season drainage. Sci Total Environ 612:1329–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ismail AM, Thapa B, Egdane J (2009) Salinity tolerance in rice: physiological bases and implications on management strategies for better crop establishment. In: Improving productivity and livelihood for fragile environments. IRRI technical bull 13. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, pp 8–13Google Scholar
  22. Khalil MAK, Shearer MJ, Rasmussen RA, Xu L, Liu JL (2008) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from subtropical rice agriculture in China. J Geophys Res 113:G00A05.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000462 Google Scholar
  23. Krauss KW, Whitbeck JL (2012) Soil greenhouse gas fluxes during wetland forest retreat along the Lower Savannah River, Georgia (USA). Wetlands 32:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lal R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int 30:981–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Burras CL, Moore KJ, Barker MF, Molstad NE (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li JB, Huang GH (2008) Pilot study of salinity (NaCl) affecting nitrogen transformation in silt loam soil. Res Environ Sci 21:98–103 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Li JL, Yu’e L, Wan YF, Wang B, Waqas MAW, Cai WW et al (2018) Combination of modified nitrogen fertilizers and water saving irrigation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase rice yield. Geoderma 315:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linquist BA, Adviento Borbe MA, Pittelkow CM, Van Kessel C, Van Groenigen KJ (2012) Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: a quantitative review and analysis. Field Crop Res 135:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu YL, Zhou ZQ, Zhang XX, Xu X, Chen H, Xiong ZQ (2015) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity from the double rice system with integrated soil-crop system management: a three-year field study. Atmos Environ 116:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu RK (2000) Soil agro-chemical analyses. Agricultural Technical Press of China Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Martins CSC, Nazaries L, Macdonald CA, Anderson IC, Singh BK (2015) Water availability and abundance of microbial groups are key determinants of greenhouse gas fluxes in a dryland forest ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 86:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marton JM, Herbert ER, Craft CB (2012) Effects of salinity on denitrification and greenhouse gas production from laboratory-incubated tidal forest soils. Wetlands 32:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mishra SR, Pattnaik P, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK (2003) Anion-mediated salinity affecting methane production in a flooded alluvial soil. Geomicrobiol J 20:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mondal MK, Bhuiyan SI, Franco DT (2001) Soil salinity reduction and prediction of salt dynamics in the coastal ricelands of Bangladesh. Agric Water Manag 47:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Reule CA, Liu XJ (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pandey A, Mai VT, Vu DQ, Bui TPL, Mai TLA, Jensen LS, de Neergaard A (2014) Organic matter and water management strategies to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in Vietnam. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patel GB, Roth LA (1977) Effect of sodium chloride on growth and methane production of methanogens. Can J Microbiol 23:893–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pattnaik P, Mishra SR, Bharati K, Mohanty SR, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK (2000) Influence of salinity on methanogenesis and associated microflora in tropical rice soils. Microbiol Res 155:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peng S, Buresh RJ, Huang J, Yang J, Zou Y, Zhong X, Wang G, Zhang F (2006) Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in China. Field Crop Res 96:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pittelkow CM, Adviento-Borbe MA, van Kessel C, Hill JE, Linquist BA (2014) Optimizing rice yields while minimizing yield-scaled global warming potential. Glob Chang Biol 20:1382–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qiao C, Liu L, Hu S, Compton JE, Greaver TL, Li Q (2015) How inhibiting nitrification affects nitrogen cycle and reduces environmental impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen input. Glob Chang Biol 21:1249–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qin Y, Liu S, Guo Y, Liu Q, Zou J (2010) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from organic and conventional rice cropping systems in Southeast China. Biol Fertil Soils 46:825–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shcherbak I, Millar N, Robertson GP (2014) Global meta-analysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:9199–9204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shi SW, Li YE, Liu YT, Wan YF, Gao QZ, Zhang ZX (2010) CH4 and N2O emission from rice field and mitigation options based on field measurements in China: an integration analysis. Sci Agric Sin 43:2923–2936 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J Environ Qual 39:1224–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P et al (2007) Agriculture. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 497–540Google Scholar
  47. Wang WQ, Zeng CS, Tong C (2009) Reviews on electron acceptors of controlling methane production from wetlands. Sci Geogr Sin 29:300–306Google Scholar
  48. Wang JY, Jia JX, Xiong ZQ, Khalil MAK, Xing G (2011) Water regime-nitrogen fertilizer-straw incorporation interaction: field study on nitrous oxide emissions from a rice agroecosystem in Nanjing, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang L, Sun X, Li S, Zhang T, Zhang W, Zhai P (2014) Application of organic amendments to a coastal saline soil in North China: effects on soil physical and chemical properties and tree growth. PLoS One 9:e89185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang W, Lai DYF, Wang C, Tong C, Zeng C (2016a) Effects of inorganic amendments, rice cultivars and cultivation methods on greenhouse gas emissions and rice productivity in a subtropical paddy field. Ecol Eng 95:770–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang SJ, Luo SS, Li XS, Yue SC, Shen YF, Li SQ (2016b) Effect of split application of nitrogen on nitrous oxide emissions from plastic mulching maize in the semiarid Loess Plateau. Agric Ecosyst Environ 220:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang WQ, Sardans J, Wang C, Zeng CS, Tong C, Asensio D (2017) Relationship s between the potential production of the greenhouse gases CO2, CH4 and N2O and soil concentrations of C, N and P across 26 paddy fields in southeastern China. Atmos Environ 164:458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu XH, Zhang HS, Li G, Liu XC, Qin P (2012) Ameliorative effect of castor bean (ricinus communis l.) planting on physico-chemical and biological properties of seashore saline soil. Ecol Eng 38:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu XH, Wang W, Xie XL, Yin CM, Hou HJ, Yan WD, Wang G (2018) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity as affected by different water management strategies in Chinese double rice-cropping systems. Sci Rep 8:779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xia L, Xia Y, Li B, Wang J, Wang S, Zhou W, Yan X (2016) Integrating agronomic practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while increasing the economic return in a rice-based cropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xiong ZQ, Liu YL, Wu Z, Zhang XL, Liu PL, Huang TQ (2015) Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China. Sci Rep 5:17774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu XWH, Zou XQ, Cao LG, Zhamangulova N, Zhao YF, Tang DH, Liu D (2014) Seasonal and spatial dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions under various vegetation covers in a coastal saline wetland in Southeast China. Ecol Eng 73:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu Y, Ge J, Tian S, Li S, Nguy Robertson AL, Zhan M et al (2015) Effects of water saving irrigation practices and drought resistant rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions from a no-till paddy in the central lowlands of China. Sci Total Environ 505:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yan X, Yagi K, Akiyama H, Akimoto H (2005) Statistical analysis of the major variables controlling methane emission from rice fields. Glob Chang Biol 11:1131–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang X, Shang Q, Wu P, Liu J, Shen Q (2010) Methane emissions from double rice agriculture under long-term fertilizing systems in Hunan, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang P, He QH, Huang JF, Tong C (2015) Fluxes of greenhouse gases at two different aquaculture ponds in the coastal zone of southeastern China. Atmos Environ 115:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yuan J, Sha ZM, Hassani D, Zhao Z, Cao LK (2017) Assessing environment impacts of organic and inorganic fertilizer on daily and seasonal greenhouse gases effluxes in rice field. Atmos Environ 155:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang X, Xu X, Liu Y, Wang J, Xiong Z (2016) Global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in rice agriculture driven by high yields and nitrogen use efficiency. Biogeosciences 13:2701–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zou JW, Huang Y, Jiang JY, Zheng XH, Sass RL (2005) A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liying Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuchun Ma
    • 1
    • 3
  • Bo Li
    • 4
  • Cheng Xiao
    • 1
  • Lixin Fan
    • 1
  • Zhengqin Xiong
    • 2
  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters / Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied MeteorologyNanjing University of Information Science & TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Agriculture and GHGs Mitigation, College of Resources and Environmental SciencesNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  4. 4.College of Natural Resources and Environmental ScienceSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations