Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 28, pp 27768–27782 | Cite as

Optimization of photo-Fenton process for the treatment of prednisolone

  • Aida María Díez
  • Ana Sofia Ribeiro
  • Maria Angeles Sanromán
  • Marta PazosEmail author
New Challenges in the Application of Advanced Oxidation Processes

Abstract

Prednisolone is a widely prescribed synthetic glucocorticoid and stated to be toxic to a number of non-target aquatic organisms. Its extensive consumption generates environmental concern due to its detection in wastewater samples at concentrations ranged from ng/L to μg/L that requests the application of suitable degradation processes. Regarding the actual treatment options, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are presented as a viable alternative. In this work, the comparison in terms of pollutant removal and energetic efficiencies, between different AOPs such as Fenton (F), photo-Fenton (UV/F), photolysis (UV), and hydrogen peroxide/photolysis (UV/H2O2), was carried out. Light diode emission (LED) was the selected source to provide the UV radiation. The UV/F process revealed the best performance, reaching high levels of both degradation and mineralization with low energy consumption. Its optimization was conducted and the operational parameters were iron and H2O2 concentrations and the working volume. Using the response surface methodology with the Box-Behnken design, the effect of independent variables and their interactions on the process response were effectively evaluated. Different responses were analyzed taking into account the prednisolone removal (TOC and drug abatements) and the energy consumptions associated. The obtained model showed an improvement of the UV/F process when treating smaller volumes and when adding high concentrations of H2O2 and Fe2+. The validation of this model was successfully carried out, having only 5% of discrepancy between the model and the experimental results. Finally, the performance of the process when having a real wastewater matrix was also tested, achieving complete mineralization and detoxification after 8 h. In addition, prednisolone degradation products were identified. Finally, the obtained low energy permitted to confirm the viability of the process.

Keywords

Photolysis Fenton Advanced oxidation processes Pharmaceutical Degradation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and ERDF Funds and Xunta de Galicia (Projects CTM2017-87326-R and ED431C 2017/47). The authors are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the financial support of Aida María Díez Sarabia under the FPI program. The authors also want to thank to Water JPI ERA-NET Cofund WaterWorks2015 Call (Project REWATER)

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acero J, Stemmler K, Von Gunten U (2000) Degradation kinetics of atrazine and its degradation products with ozone and OH radicals: a predictive tool for drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 34:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadi M, Ghanbari F (2016) Optimizing COD removal from greywater by photoelectro-persulfate process using Box-Behnken design: assessment of effluent quality and electrical energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19350–19361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed MM, Brienza M, Goetz V, Chiron S (2014) Solar photo-Fenton using peroxymonosulfate for organic micropollutants removal from domestic wastewater: comparison with heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis. Chemosphere 117:256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali MEM, Gad-Allah TA, Elmolla ES, Badawy MI (2014) Heterogeneous Fenton process using iron-containing waste (ICW) for methyl orange degradation: process performance and modeling. Desalin Water Treat 52:4538–4546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arfanis MK, Adamou P, Moustakas NG, Triantis TM, Kontos AG, Falaras P (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of salicylic acid and caffeine emerging contaminants using titania nanotubes. Chem Eng J 310(Part 2):525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arslan-Alaton I, Tureli G, Olmez-Hanci T (2009) Treatment of azo dye production wastewaters using photo-Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes: optimization by response surface methodology. J Photochem Photobiol A 202:142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asaithambi P, Aziz ARA, Daud WMABW (2016) Integrated ozone—electrocoagulation process for the removal of pollutant from industrial effluent: optimization through response surface methodology. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 105:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asghar A, Abdul Raman AA, Wan Daud WMA (2015) Advanced oxidation processes for in-situ production of hydrogen peroxide/hydroxyl radical for textile wastewater treatment: a review. J Clean Prod 87:826–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bal N, Kumar A, Du J, Nugegoda D (2016) Prednisolone impairs embryonic and posthatching development and shell formation of the freshwater snail, Physa acuta. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:2339–2348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bal N, Kumar A, Nugegoda D (2017) Assessing multigenerational effects of prednisolone to the freshwater snail, Physa acuta (Gastropoda: Physidae). J Hazard Mater 339:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbusinski K (2005) Toxicity of industrial wastewater treated by Fenton’s reagent. Polish J Environ Stud 14:11–16Google Scholar
  12. Baxendale J, Wilson J (1957) The photolysis of hydrogen peroxide at high light intensities. Trans Faraday Soc 53:344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baydum VPA, Dantas RF, Teixeira A, Pacheco JGA, Silva VL (2012) Pre-treatment of propranolol effluent by advanced oxidation processes. Afinidad 69:211–216Google Scholar
  14. Benitez FJ, Acero JL, Real FJ, Roldan G, Rodriguez E (2013) The effectiveness of single oxidants and AOPs in the degradation of emerging contaminants in waters: a comparison study. Ozone-Sci Eng 35:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biglarijoo N, Mirbagheri SA, Ehteshami M, Ghaznavi SM (2016) Optimization of Fenton process using response surface methodology and analytic hierarchy process for landfill leachate treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot 104(Part A):150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bokare AD, Choi W (2014) Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater 275:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brillas E, Sires I, Oturan MA (2009) Electro-Fenton process and related electrochemical technologies based on Fenton’s reaction chemistry. Chem Rev 109:6570–6631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cacciari R,D, Reynoso E, Montejano HA, Alicia Biasutti M (2017) Photodegradation of prednisolone under UVB solar irradiation. Role of photogenerated ROS in the degradation mechanism. Photochem Photobiol Sci 16:1717–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carra I, Sirtori C, Ponce-Robles L, Sanchez Perez JA, Malato S, Agueera A (2015) Degradation and monitoring of acetamiprid, thiabendazole and their transformation products in an agro-food industry effluent during solar photo-Fenton treatment in a raceway pond reactor. Chemosphere 130:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang H, Hu JY, Shao B (2007) Occurrence of natural and synthetic glucocorticoids in sewage treatment plants and receiving river waters. Environ Sci Technol 41:3462–3468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chelme-Ayala P, El-Din MG, Smith DW (2010) Degradation of bromoxynil and trifluralin in natural water by direct photolysis and UV plus H2O2 advanced oxidation process. Water Res 44:2221–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chenna M, Messaoudi K, Drouiche N, Lounici H (2016) Study and modeling of the organophosphorus compound degradation by photolysis of hydrogen peroxide in aqueous media by using experimental response surface design. J Industr Eng Chem 33:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DellaGreca M, Fiorentino A, Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Previtera L, Rubino M, Temussi F (2004) Toxicity of prednisolone, dexamethasone and their photochemical derivatives on aquatic organisms. Chemosphere 54:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dopar M, Kusic H, Koprivanac N (2011) Treatment of simulated industrial wastewater by photo-Fenton process. Part I: the optimization of process parameters using design of experiments (DOE). Chem Eng J 173:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duarte Byrro RM, Miyashita D, de Albuquerque VB, Velasco e Cruz AA, Cunha Junior ADS (2009) Biodegradable systems containing prednisolone acetate for orbital administration. Arq Bras Oftalmol 72:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Durr-e-Shahwar YA, Yousaf S (2012) Solar assisted photo Fenton for cost effective degradation of textile effluents in comparison to AOPs. Glob Nest J 14:477–486Google Scholar
  28. FaridaYunus R, Zheng Y, Nanayakkara KGN, Chen JP (2009) Electrochemical removal of rhodamine 6G by using RuO2 coated Ti DSA. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:7466–7473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frontistis Z, Kouramanos M, Moraitis S, Chatzisymeon E, Hapeshi E, Fatta-Kassinos D, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Mantzavinos D (2015) UV and simulated solar photodegradation of 17α-ethynylestradiol in secondary-treated wastewater by hydrogen peroxide or iron addition. Catal Today 252:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fürstner A, Seidel G (2000) Ring closing alkyne metathesis: stereoselective synthesis of civetone. J Organomet Chem 606:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garcia-Montano J, Torrades F, Perez-Estrada LA, Oller I, Malato S, Maldonado MI, Peral J (2008) Degradation pathways of the commercial reactive azo dye Procion red H-E7B under solar-assisted photo-Fenton reaction. Environ Sci Technol 42:6663–6670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giannakis S, Gamarra Vives FA, Grandjean D, Magnet A, De Alencastro LF, Pulgarin C (2015) Effect of advanced oxidation processes on the micropollutants and the effluent organic matter contained in municipal wastewater previously treated by three different secondary methods. Water Res 84:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodfellow W, Ausley L, Burton D, Denton D, Dorn P, Grothe D, Heber M, Norberg-King T, Rodgers J (2000) Major ion toxicity in effluents: a review with permitting recommendations. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hernandez-Shek MA, Agudelo Henao AC, Mendoza Marin C, Torres Castaneda H (2012) Solar photo-Fenton optimisation in treating carbofuran-contaminated water. Ing Invest 32:71–76Google Scholar
  35. Huang W, Brigante M, Wu F, Hanna K, Mailhot G (2013) Effect of ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid on Fenton and photo-Fenton processes using goethite as an iron source: optimization of parameters for bisphenol A degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ibrahim HM, Yusoff WMW, Hamid AA, Illias RM, Hassan O, Omar O (2005) Optimization of medium for the production of β-cyclodextrin glucanotransferase using central composite design (CCD). Process Biochem 40:753–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Iovino P, Chianese S, Canzano S, Prisciandaro M, Musmarra D (2016) Degradation of ibuprofen in aqueous solution with UV light: the effect of reactor volume and pH. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jeong G, Yang H, Park D (2009) Optimization of transesterification of animal fat ester using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 100:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kashyap R, Subrahmanyam EVS, Sharbaraya AR (2012) Development and validation of UV spectroscopy method for the estimation of prednisolone in bulk and dosage form. J Chem Pharm Res 4(2):1090–1096Google Scholar
  40. Kasiri MB, Aleboyeh H, Aleboyeh A (2008) Modeling and optimization of heterogeneous photo-Fenton process with response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. Environ Sci Technol 42:7970–7975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim S, Lee K, Kim Y, Hong S (1994) The effect of Iron catalysts on the formation of alcohol and ketone in the biomimetic oxidation of cyclohexane. Bull Kor Chem Soc 15:424–427Google Scholar
  42. Kongsted P, Svane IM, Lindberg H, Daugaard G, Sengeløv L (2015) Low-dose prednisolone in first-line docetaxel for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: is there a clinical benefit? Urologic Oncol 33:494.e15–494.e20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lapertot M, Ebrahimi S, Dazio S, Rubinelli A, Pulgarin C (2007) Photo-Fenton and biological integrated process for degradation of a mixture of pesticides. J Photochem Photobiol A 186:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Legrini O, Oliveros E, Braun A (1993) Photochemical processes for water-treatment. Chem Rev 93:671–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li X, Zhou M, Pan Y, Xu L, Tang Z (2017) Highly efficient advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on pre-magnetization Fe0 for wastewater treatment. Separ Purif Technol 178:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu K, Roddick FA, Fan L (2012) Impact of salinity and pH on the UVC/H2O2 treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate produced from municipal wastewater reclamation. Water Res 46:3229–3239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu S, Zhao X, Sun H, Li R, Fang Y, Huang Y (2013) The degradation of tetracycline in a photo-electro-Fenton system. Chem Eng J 231:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu Y, He X, Duan X, Fu Y, Fatta-Kassinos D, Dionysiou DD (2016) Significant role of UV and carbonate radical on the degradation of oxytetracycline in UV-AOPs: kinetics and mechanism. Water Res 95:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lofrano G, Rizzo L, Grassi M, Belgiorno V (2009) Advanced oxidation of catechol: a comparison among photocatalysis, Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Desalination 249:878–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lopez A, Mascolo G, Detomaso A, Lovecchio G, Villani G (2005) Temperature activated degradation (mineralization) of 4-chloro-3-methyl phenol by Fenton’s reagent. Chemosphere 59:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lutterbeck CA, Machado ÊL, Kümmerer K (2015a) Photodegradation of the antineoplastic cyclophosphamide: a comparative study of the efficiencies of UV/H2O2, UV/Fe2+/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 processes. Chemosphere 120:538–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lutterbeck CA, Wilde ML, Baginska E, Leder C, Machado ÊL, Kümmerer K (2015b) Degradation of 5-FU by means of advanced (photo)oxidation processes: UV/H2O2, UV/Fe2+/H2O2 and UV/TiO2—comparison of transformation products, ready biodegradability and toxicity. Sci Total Environ 527–528:232–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mahdad F, Younesi H, Bahramifar N, Hadavifar M (2016) Optimization of Fenton and photo-Fenton-based advanced oxidation processes for post-treatment of composting leachate of municipal solid waste by an activated sludge process. KSCE J Civ Eng 20:2177–2188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miao H, Zhu X, Xu D, Lu M, Huang Z, Ren H, Ruan W (2015) Transformation of aminopyrine during ozonation: characteristics and pathways. Chem Eng J 279:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miralles-Cuevas S, Oller I, Pérez JAS, Malato S (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals from MWTP effluent by nanofiltration and solar photo-Fenton using two different iron complexes at neutral pH. Water Res 64:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miralles-Cuevas S, Oller I, Agüera A, Sánchez Pérez JA, Malato S (2017) Strategies for reducing cost by using solar photo-Fenton treatment combined with nanofiltration to remove microcontaminants in real municipal effluents: toxicity and economic assessment. Chem Eng J 318:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Módenes AN, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Manenti DR, Borba FH, Palácio SM, Colombo A (2012) Performance evaluation of a photo-Fenton process applied to pollutant removal from textile effluents in a batch system. J Environ Manag 104:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Molinari A, Sarti E, Marchetti N, Pasti L (2017) Degradation of emerging concern contaminants in water by heterogeneous photocatalysis with Na4W10O32. Appl Catal B Environ 203:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Monteagudo JM, Durán A, Culebradas R, San Martín I, Carnicer A (2013) Optimization of pharmaceutical wastewater treatment by solar/ferrioxalate photo-catalysis. J Environ Manag 128:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Navarro P, Gabaldón JA, Gómez-López VM (2017) Degradation of an azo dye by a fast and innovative pulsed light/H2O2 advanced oxidation process. Dyes Pigments 136:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oh WD, Lua SK, Dong Z, Lim TT (2014) High surface area DPA-hematite for efficient detoxification of bisphenol A via peroxymonosulfate activation. J Mater Chem 2:15836–15845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pérez-Estrada LA, Malato S, Agüera A, Fernández-Alba AR (2007) Degradation of dipyrone and its main intermediates by solar AOPs: identification of intermediate products and toxicity assessment. Catal Today 129:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pignatello J, Oliveros E, MacKay A (2006) Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 36:1–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Polo-Lopez MI, Garcia-Fernandez I, Oller I, Fernandez-Ibanez P (2011) Solar disinfection of fungal spores in water aided by low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Photochem Photobiol Sci 10:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rayaroth MP, Aravind UK, Aravindakumar CT (2016) Degradation of pharmaceuticals by ultrasound-based advanced oxidation process. Environ Chem Lett 14:259–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sánchez Pérez JA, Román Sánchez IM, Carra I, Cabrera Reina A, Casas López JL, Malato S (2013) Economic evaluation of a combined photo-Fenton/MBR process using pesticides as model pollutant. Factors affecting costs. J Hazard Mater 244–245:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Santos-Juanes Jorda L, Ballesteros Martin MM, Ortega Gomez E, Cabrera Reina A, Roman Sanchez IM, Casas Lopez JL, Sanchez Perez JA (2011) Economic evaluation of the photo-Fenton process. Mineralization level and reaction time: the keys for increasing plant efficiency. J Hazard Mater 186:1924–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schriks M, van Leerdam JA, van der Linden SC, van der Burg B, van Wezel AP, de Voogt P (2010) High-resolution mass spectrometric identification and quantification of glucocorticoid compounds in various wastewaters in the Netherlands. Environ Sci Technol 44:4766–4774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sevanian A, Hochstein P (1985) Mechanisms and consequences of lipid-peroxidation in biological-systems. Annu Rev Nutr 5:365–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Silva TFCV, Fonseca A, Saraiva I, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP (2016) Scale-up and cost analysis of a photo-Fenton system for sanitary landfill leachate treatment. Chem Eng J 283:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sohrabi MR, Moghri M, Fard Masoumi HR, Amiri S, Moosavi N (2016) Optimization of reactive blue 21 removal by nanoscale zero-valent iron using response surface methodology. Arab J Chem 9:518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Souza BM, Souza BS, Guimaraes TM, Ribeiro TFS, Cerqueira AC, Sant'Anna GL Jr, Dezotti M (2016) Removal of recalcitrant organic matter content in wastewater by means of AOPs aiming industrial water reuse. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22947–22956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Speck F, Raja S, Ramesh V, Thivaharan V (2016) Modelling and optimization of homogenous photo-Fenton degradation of rhodamine B by response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Int J Environ Res 10:543–554Google Scholar
  74. Sun M, Ru X, Zhai L (2015) In-situ fabrication of supported iron oxides from synthetic acid mine drainage: high catalytic activities and good stabilities towards electro-Fenton reaction. Appl Catalysis B Environ 165:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tokumura M, Sugawara A, Raknuzzaman M, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Masunaga S (2016) Comprehensive study on effects of water matrices on removal of pharmaceuticals by three different kinds of advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 159:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Trovó AG, Pupo Nogueira RF, Agüera A, Fernandez-Alba AR, Malato S (2011) Degradation of the antibiotic amoxicillin by photo-Fenton process—chemical and toxicological assessment. Water Res 45:1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Veloutsou S, Bizani E, Fytianos K (2014) Photo-Fenton decomposition of β-blockers atenolol and metoprolol; study and optimization of system parameters and identification of intermediates. Chemosphere 107:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. de Vrieze E, van Kessel MAHJ, Peters HM, Spanings FAT, Flik G, Metz JR (2014) Prednisolone induces osteoporosis-like phenotype in regenerating zebrafish scales. Osteoporosis Int 25:567–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Walling C (1975) Fentons reagent revisited. Acc Chem Res 8:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wu J, Zhang H, Oturan N, Wang Y, Chen L, Oturan MA (2012) Application of response surface methodology to the removal of the antibiotic tetracycline by electrochemical process using carbon-felt cathode and DSA (Ti/RuO2–IrO2) anode. Chemosphere 87:614-620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Xie Y, Chen L, Liu R (2016) Oxidation of AOX and organic compounds in pharmaceutical wastewater in RSM-optimized-Fenton system. Chemosphere 155:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yasar A, Ahmad N, Khan AAA (2006) Energy requirement of ultraviolet and AOPs for the post-treatment of treated combined industrial effluent. Color Technol 122:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yonar T, Kurt A (2017) Treatability studies of hospital wastewaters with AOPs by Taguchi’s experimental design. Glob Nest J 19:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhu X, Tian J, Liu R, Chen L (2011) Optimization of Fenton and electro-Fenton oxidation of biologically treated coking wastewater using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 81:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of VigoVigoSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Superior de Engenharia do PortoRua Dr. António Bernardino de AlmeidaPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations