Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 16, pp 16111–16120 | Cite as

Identification of the main mechanisms involved in the tolerance and bioremediation of Cr(VI) by Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E

  • Ornella M. Ontañon
  • Marilina Fernandez
  • Elizabeth Agostini
  • Paola S. González
Research Article
  • 137 Downloads

Abstract

Chromium pollution is a problem that affects different areas worldwide and, therefore, must be solved. Bioremediation is a promising alternative to treat environmental contamination, but finding bacterial strains able to tolerate and remove different contaminants is a major challenge, since most co-polluted sites contain mixtures of organic and inorganic substances. In the present work, Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E, isolated from the bacterial consortium SFC 500-1 native to tannery sediments, showed tolerance to various concentrations of different phenolic compounds and heavy metals, such as Cr(VI). This strain was able to efficiently remove Cr(VI), even in the presence of phenol. The detection of the chrA gene suggested that Cr(VI) extrusion could be a mechanism that allowed this strain to tolerate the heavy metal. However, reduction through cytosolic NADH-dependent chromate reductases may be the main mechanism involved in the remediation. The information provided in this study about the mechanisms through which Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E removes Cr(VI) should be taken into account for the future application of this strain as a possible candidate to remediate contaminated environments.

Keywords

Bacillus Cr(VI) Chromate reductases Transporter protein 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Paola S. González and Elizabeth Agostini are researchers from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) (Argentina). Ornella M. Ontañon and Marilina Fernandez are on a fellowship from CONICET. This work was supported by grants from PPI (SECyT-UNRC), CONICET, MinCyT Córdoba, and PICT (FONCyT).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1764_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

References

  1. Abha S, Singh CS (2012) Hydrocarbon pollution: effects on living organisms, remediation of contaminated environments, and effects of heavy metals co-contamination on bioremediation. Introduction to Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes and bioremediation of oil-contaminated sites 185–206Google Scholar
  2. Ackerley DF, Gonzalez CF, Park CH et al (2004) Chromate-reducing properties of soluble Flavoproteins from pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli. Society 70:873–882Google Scholar
  3. Ackerley DF, Barak Y, Lynch SV, Curtin J, Matin A (2006) Effect of chromate stress on Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 188:3371–3381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahemad M (2014) Bacterial mechanisms for Cr(VI) resistance and reduction: an overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiol 59:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Khalid T, El-Naas MH (2012) Aerobic biodegradation of phenols: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:1631–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. APHA-AWWA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th ednGoogle Scholar
  7. Baaziz H, Gambari C, Boyeldieu A et al (2017) ChrASO, the chromate efflux pump of Shewanella oneidensis, improves chromate survival and reduction. PLoS One 12:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee A, Ghoshal AK (2016) Biodegradation of real petroleum wastewater by immobilized hyper phenol-tolerant strains of Bacillus cereus in a fluidized bed bioreactor. 3 Biotech 6:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bencosme SA, TsutSumi V (1970) Fast method for processing biologic material for electron microscopy. Lab Investig 23:447–450Google Scholar
  10. Beringer JE (1974) R factor transfer in Rhizobiurn Zegurninosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84:188–198Google Scholar
  11. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 254:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camargo FAO, Bento FM, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2004) Hexavalent chromium reduction by an actinomycete, Arthrobacter crystallopoietes ES 32. Biol Trace Elem Res 97:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen Z, Huang Z, Cheng Y, Pan D, Pan X, Yu M, Pan Z, Lin Z, Guan X, Wu Z (2012) Cr(VI) uptake mechanism of Bacillus cereus. Chemosphere 87:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhal B, Thatoi HN, Das NN, Pandey BD (2013) Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 250–251:272–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong G, Wang Y, Gong L, Wang M, Wang H, He N, Zheng Y, Li Q (2013) Formation of soluble Cr(III) end-products and nanoparticles during Cr(VI) reduction by Bacillus cereus strain XMCr-6. Biochem Eng J 70:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eswaramoorthy S, Poulain S, Hienerwadel R et al (2012) Crystal structure of ChrR-A quinone reductase with the capacity to reduce chromate. PLoS One 7:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández M, Morales GM, Agostini E, González PS (2017) An approach to study ultrastructural changes and adaptive strategies displayed by Acinetobacter guillouiae SFC 500-1A under simultaneous Cr(VI) and phenol treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:20390–20400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadd GM (1992) Metals and microorganisms: a problem of definition. FEMS Microbiol Lett 100:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez CF, Ackerley DF, Lynch SV, Matin A (2005) ChrR, a soluble quinone reductase of Pseudomonas putida that defends against H2O2. J Biol Chem 280:22590–22595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutiérrez-Corona JF, Romo-Rodríguez P, Santos-Escobar F, Espino-Saldaña AE, Hernández-Escoto H (2016) Microbial interactions with chromium: basic biological processes and applications in environmental biotechnology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He M, Li X, Guo L et al (2010) Characterization and genomic analysis of chromate resistant and reducing Bacillus cereus. BMC Microbiol 10:221Google Scholar
  22. Huang Y, Feng H, Lu H, Zeng Y (2017) A thorough survey for Cr-resistant and/or -reducing bacteria identified comprehensive and pivotal taxa. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 117:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iftikhar S, Faisal M, Hasnain S (2007) Cytosolic reduction of toxic Cr (VI) by indigenous microorganism. Res J Environ Sci 1:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez G, Urdiain M, Cifuentes A, López-López A, Blanch AR, Tamames J, Kämpfer P, Kolstø AB, Ramón D, Martínez JF, Codoñer FM, Rosselló-Móra R (2013) Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp. nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Mou H, Chen L, Mirza ZA, Liu L (2015) Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater remediation with simulated permeable reactive barrier (PRB) filled with natural pyrite as reactive material: environmental factors and effectiveness. J Hazard Mater 298:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mary Mangaiyarkarasi MS, Vincent S, Janarthanan S, Subba Rao T, Tata BVR (2011) Bioreduction of Cr(VI) by alkaliphilic Bacillus subtilis and interaction of the membrane groups. Saudi J Biol Sci 18:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLean J, Beveridge TJ (2001) Chromate reduction by a pseudomonad isolated from a site contaminated with chromated copper arsenate. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1076–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Megharaj M, Ramakrishnan B, Venkateswarlu K, Sethunathan N, Naidu R (2011) Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: a critical perspective. Environ Int 37:1362–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murugavelh S, Mohanty K (2012) Bioreduction of hexavalent chromium by free cells and cell free extracts of Halomonas sp. Elsevier B.VGoogle Scholar
  31. Narayani M, Shetty KV (2013) Chromium-resistant bacteria and their environmental condition for hexavalent chromium removal: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 43:955–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ontañon OM, González PS, Agostini E (2015a) Optimization of simultaneous removal of Cr (VI) and phenol by a native bacterial consortium: its use for bioaugmentation of co-polluted effluents. J Appl Microbiol 119:1011–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ontañon OM, González PS, Agostini E (2015b) Biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in simultaneous phenol and Cr(VI) removal by Acinetobacter guillouiae SFC 500-1A. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(17):13014–13023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ontañon OM, González PS, Barros GG, Agostini E (2017) Improvement of simultaneous Cr(VI) and phenol removal by an immobilised bacterial consortium and characterisation of biodegradation products. New Biotechnol 37:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oves M, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2013) Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thuringiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil. Saudi J Biol Sci 20:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paisio CE, Talano MA, González PS et al (2013) Characterization of a phenol-degrading bacterium isolated from an industrial effluent and its potential application for bioremediation. Environ Technol (UK) 34:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pal A, Dutta S, Paul a K (2005) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by cell-free extract of Bacillus sphaericus AND 303 isolated from serpentine soil. Curr Microbiol 51:327–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pan X, Liu Z, Chen Z, Cheng Y, Pan D, Shao J, Lin Z, Guan X (2014) Investigation of Cr(VI) reduction and Cr(III) immobilization mechanism by planktonic cells and biofilms of Bacillus subtilis ATCC-6633. Water Res 55:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patra RC, Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2010) Soil biology & biochemistry molecular characterization of chromium (VI) reducing potential in gram positive bacteria isolated from contaminated sites. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1857–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pei QH, Shahir S, Santhana Raj AS, Zakaria ZA, Ahmad WA (2009) Chromium(VI) resistance and removal by Acinetobacter haemolyticus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1085–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Polti MA, Amoroso MJ, Abate CM (2010) Full paper chromate reductase activity in Streptomyces sp. MC1. Cultures 18:11–18Google Scholar
  42. Polti MA, Amoroso MJ, Abate CM (2011) Intracellular chromium accumulation by Streptomyces sp. MC1. Water Air Soil Pollut 214:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Puzon GJ, Roberts AG, Kramer DM, Xun L (2005) Formation of soluble organo-chromium(III) complexes after chromate reduction in the presence of cellular organics. Environ Sci Technol 39:2811–2817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quintelas C, Fernandes B, Castro J, Figueiredo H, Tavares T (2008) Biosorption of Cr(VI) by a Bacillus coagulans biofilm supported on granular activated carbon (GAC). Chem Eng J 136:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saffert RT, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Monson Jobe KE, Mandrekar J, Patel R (2011) Comparison of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer to BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 49:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandrin TR, Maier RM (2003) Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 111:1093–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saranraj P, Sujitha D (2013) Microbial bioremediation of chromium in tannery effluent: a review. International journal of. Microbiol Res 4:305–320Google Scholar
  48. Sau GB, Chatterjee S, Mukherjee SK (2010) Chromate reduction by cell-free extract of Bacillus firmus KUCr1. Pol J Microbiol 59:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shen H, Wang YT (1993) Characterization of enzymatic reduction of hexavalent chromium by Escherichia coli ATCC 33456. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3771–3777Google Scholar
  50. Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ (1994) Methods in legume-rhizobium technologyGoogle Scholar
  51. Thatoi H, Das S, Mishra J, Prasad B (2014) Bacterial chromate reductase , a potential enzyme for bioremediation of hexavalent chromium : a review. J Environ Manag 146:383–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tripathi M, Vikram S, Jain RK, Garg SK (2011) Isolation and growth characteristics of chromium(VI) and pentachlorophenol tolerant bacterial isolate from treated tannery effluent for its possible use in simultaneous bioremediation. Indian J Microbiol 51:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verma T, Singh N (2013) Isolation and process parameter optimization of Brevibacterium casei for simultaneous bioremediation of hexavalent chromium and pentachlorophenol. J Basic Microbiol 53:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Viti C, Marchi E, Decorosi F, Giovannetti L (2014) Molecular mechanisms of Cr(VI) resistance in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:633–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wagner M, Nicell JA (2002) Detoxification of phenolic solutions with horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide. Water Res 36:4041–4052CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ornella M. Ontañon
    • 1
  • Marilina Fernandez
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Agostini
    • 1
  • Paola S. González
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología Molecular, FCEFQyNUniversidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC)Río CuartoArgentina

Personalised recommendations