Identification of the main mechanisms involved in the tolerance and bioremediation of Cr(VI) by Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E
- 137 Downloads
Chromium pollution is a problem that affects different areas worldwide and, therefore, must be solved. Bioremediation is a promising alternative to treat environmental contamination, but finding bacterial strains able to tolerate and remove different contaminants is a major challenge, since most co-polluted sites contain mixtures of organic and inorganic substances. In the present work, Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E, isolated from the bacterial consortium SFC 500-1 native to tannery sediments, showed tolerance to various concentrations of different phenolic compounds and heavy metals, such as Cr(VI). This strain was able to efficiently remove Cr(VI), even in the presence of phenol. The detection of the chrA gene suggested that Cr(VI) extrusion could be a mechanism that allowed this strain to tolerate the heavy metal. However, reduction through cytosolic NADH-dependent chromate reductases may be the main mechanism involved in the remediation. The information provided in this study about the mechanisms through which Bacillus sp. SFC 500-1E removes Cr(VI) should be taken into account for the future application of this strain as a possible candidate to remediate contaminated environments.
KeywordsBacillus Cr(VI) Chromate reductases Transporter protein
Paola S. González and Elizabeth Agostini are researchers from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) (Argentina). Ornella M. Ontañon and Marilina Fernandez are on a fellowship from CONICET. This work was supported by grants from PPI (SECyT-UNRC), CONICET, MinCyT Córdoba, and PICT (FONCyT).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abha S, Singh CS (2012) Hydrocarbon pollution: effects on living organisms, remediation of contaminated environments, and effects of heavy metals co-contamination on bioremediation. Introduction to Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes and bioremediation of oil-contaminated sites 185–206Google Scholar
- Ackerley DF, Gonzalez CF, Park CH et al (2004) Chromate-reducing properties of soluble Flavoproteins from pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli. Society 70:873–882Google Scholar
- APHA-AWWA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th ednGoogle Scholar
- Bencosme SA, TsutSumi V (1970) Fast method for processing biologic material for electron microscopy. Lab Investig 23:447–450Google Scholar
- Beringer JE (1974) R factor transfer in Rhizobiurn Zegurninosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84:188–198Google Scholar
- He M, Li X, Guo L et al (2010) Characterization and genomic analysis of chromate resistant and reducing Bacillus cereus. BMC Microbiol 10:221Google Scholar
- Jiménez G, Urdiain M, Cifuentes A, López-López A, Blanch AR, Tamames J, Kämpfer P, Kolstø AB, Ramón D, Martínez JF, Codoñer FM, Rosselló-Móra R (2013) Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp. nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murugavelh S, Mohanty K (2012) Bioreduction of hexavalent chromium by free cells and cell free extracts of Halomonas sp. Elsevier B.VGoogle Scholar
- Polti MA, Amoroso MJ, Abate CM (2010) Full paper chromate reductase activity in Streptomyces sp. MC1. Cultures 18:11–18Google Scholar
- Saffert RT, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Monson Jobe KE, Mandrekar J, Patel R (2011) Comparison of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer to BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 49:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saranraj P, Sujitha D (2013) Microbial bioremediation of chromium in tannery effluent: a review. International journal of. Microbiol Res 4:305–320Google Scholar
- Shen H, Wang YT (1993) Characterization of enzymatic reduction of hexavalent chromium by Escherichia coli ATCC 33456. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3771–3777Google Scholar
- Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ (1994) Methods in legume-rhizobium technologyGoogle Scholar