Tissue distribution and oral exposure risk assessment of heavy metals in an urban bird: magpie from Central Iran
Direct ingestion of soil and/or soil attached to the food items is a potential rout for wildlife exposure to contaminants. In this study, bioaccumulation of five heavy metals (HMs) in internal tissues of an urban bird (Pica pica) collected from Aran-O-Bidgol City, Central Iran and their related soil were investigated. A total of 15 magpie specimens were collected in autumn 2013 and then their internal tissues were digested using a mixture of HNO3 and H2O2, and finally, concentrations of HMs were detected by ICP-OES. In addition, in order to show level of HM exposure risk to magpie, an exposure risk assessment was modeled. Results indicated that HMs were accumulated as follows: liver > kidney > muscle. Zn and Cu were significantly higher in magpie’s tissues collected from agricultural site; on the other hand, Pb and Cd were significantly higher in industrial site (p < 0.05). Level of Cd in male’s livers (2.11 μg/g dw) was significantly higher than in females (1.85 μg/g dw) (p < 0.05). Levels of Cd, Pb, and Ni in liver, muscle, and kidney, respectively, were significantly higher in adults than in subadults (p < 0.05). Soil exposure doses of all HMs were lower than tolerable daily intake (Zn 4.35, Cu 1.34, Ni 5.65, Pb 0.35, and Cd 0.53). The calculated hazard quotations (HQs) for HMs were as follows: Pb > Zn > Cu > Ni > Cd and for all HMs were at no risk level (HQ < 1). The amounts of hazard index for three sites were as follows: urban (1.032) > agriculture (0.943) ≥ industry (0.941) and only for urban area was at low risk (1 < HQ < 2). It seemed that birds living in a safe environment and/or HM contaminations in soil separately had no negative effects on magpies. We can also suggest that low levels of HMs in magpie’s tissues can be due to low levels of HMs in soil.
KeywordsTrace elements Biomonitoring Exposure risk assessment Soil contamination Urban bird Magpie (Pica pica)
The authors would like to thank Mr. Allahyar Dovlatkhah and other staff of the Aran-O-Bidgol Department of Environment for providing the necessary facilities during sample collection. The authors also thank Ms. Neda Ravankhah for her help during the sample analysis. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
- Birkhead TR (1991) The magpies. T & AD Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Burger J (1993) Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Rev Environ Toxicol 5:203–311Google Scholar
- CCME (1998) Protocol for the derivation of Canadian tissue residue guidelines for the protection of wildlife that consume aquatic biota, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
- Dauwe T, Bervoets L, Blust R, Pinxten R, Eens M (1999) Are eggshells and egg contents of great and blue tits suitable as indicators of heavy metal pollution? Belg J Zool 129:439–447Google Scholar
- Levengood JM, Sanderson GC, Anderson WL, Foley GL, Skowron LM, Brown PW, Seets JW (1999) Acute toxicity of ingested zinc shot to game-farm mallards. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull 36:1–36Google Scholar
- Mirsanjari MM, Sheybanifar F, Arjmand F (2014) The study of forest hara biosphere reserve in coast of persian gulf and the importance of heavy metal accumulation; case study: feathers of great cormorant. Bioscience 6(2):159–160Google Scholar
- Okati N, Rezaee M (2013) Heavy metals concentrations in different tissues of Persian Jird (Merionespersicus) in Sistan region. Int Res J Appl Bas Sci 5(10):1272–1276Google Scholar
- Sample BE, Opresko DM, Suter II GW (1996) Toxicological benchmarks for wildlife: 1996 Revision, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- Scheifler R, Coeurdassier M, Morilhat C, Bernard N, Faivre B, Flicoteaux P, Giraudoux P, Noël M, Piotte P, RieffelD DVA (2006) Lead concentrations in feathers and blood of common blackbirds (Turdusmerula) and in earthworms inhabiting unpolluted and moderately polluted urban areas. Sci Total Environ 371(1):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suter GW II (2011) Ecological risk assessment, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Talmage SS, Walton BT (1991) Small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam T Springer New York, In, pp 47–145Google Scholar
- USEPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I: human health evaluation manual (Part A), Interim Final, EPA/540/1–89/002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar