Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 9998–10005 | Cite as

Pollution characteristics of surface runoff under different restoration types in manganese tailing wasteland

Research Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

A great deal of manganese and associated heavy metals (such as Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, etc.) was produced in manganese mining, smelting, and other processes and weathering and leaching of waste slag, which entered rainwater runoff by different means under the action of rainfall runoff. It caused heavy metal pollution in water environment to surrounding areas, and then environmental and human health risks were becoming increasingly serious. In the Xiangtan manganese mine, we studied the characteristics of nutritional pollutants and heavy metals by using the method of bounded runoff plots on the manganese tailing wasteland after carrying out some site treatments using three different approaches, such as (1) exposed tailings, the control treatment (ET), (2) external-soil amelioration and colonization of Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers. turf (EC), and (3) external-soil amelioration and seedling seeding propagation of Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers. (ES). The research showed that the maximum runoff occurred in 20,140,712 rainfall events, and the basic law of runoff was EC area > ET area > ES area in the same rainfall event. The concentration of total suspended solids (TSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of three ecological restoration areas adopted the following rule: ET area > EC area > ES area. Nitrogen (N) existed mainly in the form of water soluble while phosphorus (P) was particulate. The highest concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were 11.57 ± 2.99 mg/L in the EC area and 1.42 ± 0.56 mg/L in the ET area, respectively. Cr, Ni, Pb, Zn, Mn, and Cu in surface runoff from three restoration types all exceeded the class V level of the environmental quality standard for surface water except Cu in EC and ES areas. Pollution levels of heavy metals in surface runoff from three restoration areas are shown as follows: ET area > EC area > ES area. There was a significant positive correlation between TSS and runoff, COD, and TP. And this correlation was significant between total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), TN, total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), and TP. The six heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Mn, and Cr) in surface runoff of different ecological restoration areas were strongly related to each other, and were significantly related to the TSS.

Keywords

Manganese tailing wasteland Vegetation restoration Surface runoff Heavy metals Nutritional pollutants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Environmental protection’s special scientific research for the Chinese public welfare industry (No. 201109056) is gratefully acknowledged. Thank Timothy Sean Bellairs of Charles Darwin University for your help accorded to me and my paper during the Modification-Polish.

References

  1. Berendse F, Ruijven JV, Jongejans E, Keesstra S (2015) Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. Ecosystems 18(5):881–888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9869-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borris M, Österlund H, Marsalek J, Viklander M (2016) Contribution of coarse particles from road surfaces to dissolved and particle-bound heavy metal loads in runoff: a laboratory leaching study with synthetic stormwater. Sci Total Environ 573:212–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cano AF, Carmona DM, Zornoza R, Cerda C (2013) Assessment of the lead and zinc contents in natural soils and tailing ponds from the Cartagena-La Unión mining district, SE Spain. J Geochem Explor 124:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen GQ, Wang MJ, Liu ZJ, Chi WF (2017a) The biogeophysical effects of revegetation around mining areas: a case study of Dongsheng mining areas in Inner Mongolia. Sustainability 9(4):628.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen LX, Li JT, Chen YT, Huang LN, Hua ZS, Hu M (2013) Shifts in microbial community composition and function in the acidification of a lead/zinc mine tailings. Environ Microbiol 15(9):2431–2444.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Z, Wang YP, Jiang XL, Fu D, Xia D, Wang HT, Dong GW, Li QB (2017b) Dual roles of AQDS as electron shuttles for microbes and dissolved organic matter involved in arsenic and iron mobilization in the arsenic-rich sediment. Sci Total Environ 574:1684–1694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng LL, Hu ZQ, Lou S (2017) Improved methods for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the reclamation suitability of abandoned mine lands. Int J Min Reclam Env 31(3):212–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2016.1167305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daldoul G, Souissi R, Souissi F, Jemmali N, Chakroun HK (2015) Assessment and mobility of heavy metals in carbonated soils contaminated by old mine tailings in North Tunisia. J Afr Earth Sci 110:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong GW, Huang YH, Wang YP, Wang HT, He N, Li QB (2014) Role of nanoparticles in controlling arsenic release from sediments near a realgar tailing. Environ Sci Technol 48(13):7469–7476.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es4055077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dou CM, Fu XP, Chen XC, Shi JY, Chen YX (2009) Accumulation and detoxification of manganese in hyperaccumulator Phytolacca americana. Plant Biol 11(5):664–670.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00163.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernando DR, Lynch JP (2015) Manganese phytotoxicity: new light on an old problem. Ann Bot 116(3):313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gan H, Zhuo M, Li D, Zhou Y (2008) Quality characterization and impact assessment of highway runoff in urban and rural area of Guangzhou, China. Environ Monit Assess 140(1–3):147–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9856-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginocchio R, Leon-Lobos P, Arellano EC, Anic V, Ovalle JF, Bakers AJM (2017) Soil physicochemical factors as environmental filters for spontaneous plant colonization of abandoned tailing dumps. Environ Sci and Pollut R 24(15):13484–13496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8894-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang L, Moore PA, Kleinman PJ, Elkin KR, Savin MC, Pote DH (2016) Reducing phosphorus runoff and leaching from poultry litter with alum: twenty-year small plot and paired-watershed studies. J Environ Qual 45(4):1413–1420.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.09.0482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalinovic TS, Serbula SM, Radojevic AA, Kalinovic JV, Steharnik MM, Petrovic JV (2016) Elder, linden and pine biomonitoring ability of pollution emitted from the copper smelter and the tailings ponds. Geoderma 262:266–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong XF, Guo Y, Xue SG, Hartley W, Wu C, Ye YZ, Chen QY (2017) Natural evolution of alkaline characteristics in bauxite residue. J Clean Prod 143:224–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong XF, Tian T, Xue SG, Hartley W, Huang LB, Wu C, Li CX (2018) Development of alkaline electrochemical characteristics demonstrates soil formation in bauxite residue undergoing natural rehabilitation. Land Degrad Dev 29:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lai X, Hao F, Ren X (2015) Loss characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff with different land use types of a small watershed in freeze-thaw agricultural area. Fresenius Environ Bull 24(11A):3780–3793Google Scholar
  19. Li GX, Zhang J, Shao JP, Zhou B, Bi B, Xie KM (2015a) Chemical properties of soil layers of restoration sites in phosphate mining area, China. Environ Earth Sci 73(5):2027–2030.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3551-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Luo C, Xi Q, Li H, Pan J, Zhou Q (2015b) Assessment of the AnnAGNPS model in simulating runoff and nutrients in a typical small watershed in the Taihu Lake basin, china. Catena 133(20):349–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu X, Feng J, Qiao Y, Wang Y, Zhu L (2017) Assessment of the effects of total emission control policies on surface water quality in China: 2004 to 2014. J Environ Qual 46(3):605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo ZH, Tian DL, Ning C, Yan WD, Xiang WH, Peng CH (2015) Roles of Koelreuteria bipinnata as a suitable accumulator tree species in remediating Mn, Zn, Pb, and Cd pollution on Mn mining wastelands in southern China. Environ Earth Sci 74(5):4549–4559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4510-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez-Mena M, Albaladejo J, Castillo VM (2015) Factors influencing surface runoff generation in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment: Chicamo watershed, SE Spain. Hydrol Process 12(5):741–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muñoz MA, Guzman JG, Zornoza R, Moreno F, Faz A, Lal R (2016) Effects of biochar and marble mud on mine waste properties to reclaim tailing ponds. Land Degrad Dev 27(4):1227–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ren B, Zhou Y, Hursthouse AS, Deng R (2017) Research on the characteristics and mechanism of the cumulative release of antimony from an antimony smelting slag stacking area under rainfall leaching. J Anal Methods Chem Doi 2017:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7206876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shu XH, Zhang Q, Lu GN, Yi XY, Dang Z (2017) Pollution characteristics and assessment of sulfide tailings from the Dabaoshan mine, china. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.012
  27. Souissi R, Souissi F, Ghorbel M, Munoz M, Courjault-Radé P (2015) Mobility of Pb, Zn and Cd in a soil developed on a carbonated bedrock in a semi-arid climate and contaminated by Pb–Zn tailing, Jebel Ressas (NE Tunisia). Environ Earth Sci 73(7):3501–3512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang ZJ, Guo ZL, Zhou L, Xue SG, Zhu QF, Zhu HK (2016) Combined and relative effect levels of perceived risk, knowledge, optimism, pessimism, and social trust on anxiety among inhabitants concerning living on heavy metal contaminated soil. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(11):1076.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang J, Ye S, Xue SG, Hartley W, Wu H (2016) The physiological response of Mirabilis jalapa Linn. to lead stress and accumulation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.04.030
  30. Wang SS, Gao B, Li YC, Ok YS, Shen CF, Xue SG (2017) Biochar provides a safe and value-added solution for hyperaccumulating plant disposal: a case study of Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. (Phytolaccaceae). Chemosphere 178:59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williame J, Michaeld C (2011) Transport of phosphorus and nitrogen in surface runoff in a corn silage system: paired watershed methodology and calibration period results. Can J Soil Sci 91(3):479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu C, Zou Q, Xue SG, Pan WS, Huang L, Hartley W, Mo JY (2016a) The effect of silicon on iron plaque formation and arsenic accumulation in rice genotypes with different radial oxygen loss (ROL). Environ Pollut 212(5):27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu C, Zou Q, Xue SG, Pan WS, Yue X, Hartley W, Huang L, Mo JY (2016b) Effect of silicate on arsenic fractionation in soils and its accumulation in rice plants. Chemosphere 165:478–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu C, Wang QL, Xue SG, Pan WS, Lou LQ, Li DJ (2018) Do aeration conditions affect arsenic and phosphate accumulation and phosphate transporter expression in rice (Oryza sativa L.)? Environ Sci and Pollut R 25(1):43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7976-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu L, Long TY, Liu X, Guo JS (2012) Impacts of climate and land-use changes on the migration of non-point source nitrogen and phosphorus during rainfall-runoff in the Jialing river watershed, China. J Hydrol 475(12):26–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xue SG, Zhu F, Wu C, Lei J, Hartley W, Pan WS (2016a) Effects of manganese on the microstructures of Chenopodium ambrosioides L., a manganese tolerant plant. Int J Phytoremediat 18(7):710–719.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1131233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xue SG, Zhu F, Kong XF, Wu C, Huang L, Huang N, Hartley W (2016b) A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (red mud). Environ Sci and Pollut R 23(2):1120–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4558-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xue SG, Shi LZ, Wu C, Wu H, Qin YY, Pan WS, Hartley W, Cui MQ (2017) Cadmium, lead, and arsenic contamination in paddy soils of a mining area and their exposure effects on human HEPG2 and keratinocyte cell-lines. Environ Res 156:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xue SG, Wang J, Wu C, Li S, Hartley W, Wu H, Cui MQ (2018) Physiological response of Polygonum perfoliatum L. following exposure to elevated manganese concentrations. Environ Sci and Pollut R 25(1):132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8312-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Y, He Z, Wang Y, Fan J, Liang Z, Stoffella PJ (2013) Dissolved organic matter in relation to nutrients (N and P) and heavy metals in surface runoff water as affected by temporal variation and land uses—a case study from Indian River Area, South Florida, USA. Agr Water Manage 118(2):38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yolcubal I, Demiray AD, Çiftçi E, Sanğu E (2016) Environmental impact of mining activities on surface water and sediment qualities around murgul copper mine, Northeastern Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 75(21):1415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6224-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan Z, Chu Y, Shen Y (2015) Simulation of surface runoff and sediment yield under different land-use in a Taihang mountains watershed, North China. Soil Till Res 153(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou Y, Xu JF, Yin W, Ai L, Fang NF, Tan WF (2017) Hydrological and environmental controls of the stream nitrate concentration and flux in a small agricultural watershed. J Hydrol 545:355–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhu F, Liao JX, Xue SG, Hartley W, Zou Q, Wu H (2016a) Evaluation of aggregate microstructures following natural regeneration in bauxite residue as characterized by synchrotron-based X-ray micro-computed tomography. Sci Total Environ 573:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu F, Li XF, Xue SG, Hartley W, Wu C, Han FS (2016b) Natural plant colonization improves the physical condition of bauxite residue over time. Environ Sci and Pollut R 23(22):22897–22905.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7508-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu F, Hou JT, Xue SG, Wu C, Wang QL, Hartley W (2017) Vermicompost and gypsum amendments improve aggregate formation in bauxite residue. Land Degrad Dev 28(7):2109–2120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu F, Cheng QY, Xue SG, Li CX, Hartley W, Wu C, Tian T (2018) Influence of natural regeneration on fractal features of residue microaggregates in bauxite residue disposal areas. Land Degrad Dev 29:138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zou Q, An WH, Wu C, Li WC, Fu AQ, Xiao RY, Chen HK, Xue SG (2018) Red mud-modified biochar reduces soil arsenic availability and changes bacterial composition. Environ Chem Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0688-1

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and EnvironmentCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control & Treatment of Heavy Metal PollutionCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations