Skip to main content

Simulation of the hydraulic performance of highway filter drains through laboratory models and stormwater management tools

Abstract

Road drainage is one of the most relevant assets in transport infrastructure due to its inherent influence on traffic management and road safety. Highway filter drains (HFDs), also known as “French Drains”, are the main drainage system currently in use in the UK, throughout 7000 km of its strategic road network. Despite being a widespread technique across the whole country, little research has been completed on their design considerations and their subsequent impact on their hydraulic performance, representing a gap in the field. Laboratory experiments have been proven to be a reliable indicator for the simulation of the hydraulic performance of stormwater best management practices (BMPs). In addition to this, stormwater management tools (SMT) have been preferentially chosen as a design tool for BMPs by practitioners from all over the world. In this context, this research aims to investigate the hydraulic performance of HFDs by comparing the results from laboratory simulation and two widely used SMT such as the US EPA’s stormwater management model (SWMM) and MicroDrainage®. Statistical analyses were applied to a series of rainfall scenarios simulated, showing a high level of accuracy between the results obtained in laboratory and using SMT as indicated by the high and low values of the Nash-Sutcliffe and R 2 coefficients and root-mean-square error (RMSE) reached, which validated the usefulness of SMT to determine the hydraulic performance of HFDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Alfredo K, Montalto F, Goldstein A (2010) Observed and modelled performances of prototype green roof test plots subjected to simulated low- and high-intensity precipitations in a laboratory experiment. Journal of hydrologic engineering 15(6), 011006QHE, 444–457 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000135

  2. Andrés-Valeri VCA, Castro-Fresno D, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J (2014) Comparative analysis of the outflow water quality of two sustainable linear drainage systems. Water Sci Technol 70(8):1341–1347. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattarai R, Kalita PK, Patel MK (2009) Nutrient transport through a vegetative filter strip with subsurface drainage. J Environ Manag 90(5):1868–1876. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2006) BS EN 13242: aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials for use in civil engineering work and road construction. BSI, UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruen M, Johnston P, Quinn MK, Desta M, Higgins N, Bradley C, Burns S. Impact assessment of highway drainage on surface water quality. Report prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency by the Centre for Water Resources Research, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland, 2006.

  6. Castro-Fresno D, Andrés-Valeri VC, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J (2013) Sustainable drainage practices in Spain, specially focused on pervious pavements. Water (Switzerland) 5(1):67–93. doi:10.3390/w5010067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7(3):1247–1250. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charbeneau RJ, Klenzendorf JB, Barrett ME (2010) Methodology for determining laboratory and in situ hydraulic conductivity of asphalt permeable friction course. J Hydraul Eng 137(1):15–22. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cipolla SS, Maglionico M, Stojkov I (2016) A long-term hydrological modelling of an extensive green roof by means of SWMM. Ecol Eng 95:876–887. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.009

  10. Colebrook CF, White CM (1937) Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes. Proc Royal Soc London. Series A, Math Phys Sci 161(906):367–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coupe SJ, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Charlesworth SM, Rowlands EG (2015) research on novel highway filter drain designs for the protection of downstream environments. SUDSnet International Conference, Coventry, 2015. http://sudsnet.abertay.ac.uk/downloads.htm. Accessed 30 December 2016

  12. Coupe SJ, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, McLaughling A-M, Charlesworth SM, Rowlands EG (2016) The retention and in-situ treatment of contaminated sediments in laboratory highway filter drain models. 4th Annual Water Efficiency Conference, Coventry, UK https://www.watefnetwork.co.uk/files/default/resources/Conference2016/Session_One/45-COUPE.pdf. Accessed 30 December 2016

  13. Deletic A (2005) Sediment transport in urban runoff over grassed areas. J Hydrol 301(1–4):108–122. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Desta MB, Bruen M, Higgins N, Johnston P (2007) Highway runoff quality in Ireland. J Environ Monit 9:366–371. doi:10.1039/B702327H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DMRB-UK (2004). Design manual for roads and bridges: geotechnics and drainage. Vol. 4, sec. 2, part 1. (HA 106/04). Drainage of runoff from natural catchments. Technical Report, Highways Agency, UK.

  16. Ellis JB, Rowlands EG (2007) Highway filter drain waste arisings: a challenge for urban source control management? Water Sci Technol 56(10):125–131. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Trowsdale S, Barraud S, Semadeni-Davies A, Bertrand-Krajewski J-L, Mikkelsen PS, Rivard G, Uhl M, Dagenais D, Viklander M (2015) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12(7):525–542. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freimund, M., Haselbach, L., Poor, C., Thomas, A. (2015). Modified media filter drain mix with alternate aggregate grading. Innovative materials and design for sustainable transportation infrastructure—selected papers from the international symposium on systematic approaches to environmental sustainability in transportation. pp. 143–153 doi: 10.1061/9780784479278.014

  19. Golroo A, Tighe SL (2012) Pervious concrete pavement performance modeling: an empirical approach in cold climates. Can J Civ Eng 39(10):1100–1112. doi:10.1139/l2012-088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haselbach, L.M., Rath, J.R., Werner, B. (2015). Extended performance of media filter drains: existing media. International Low Impact Development Conference 2015—LID: it works in all climates and soils. Proceedings of the 2015 International Low Impact Development Conference pp. 304-311 doi: 10.1061/9780784479025.031

  21. Huang J, He J, Valeo C, Chu A (2016) Temporal evolution modeling of hydraulic and water quality performance of permeable pavements. J Hydrol 533:15–27. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hirsch RM, Helsel DR, Cohn TA, Gilroy EJ (1993) Statistical analysis of hydrologic data. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-hill, New York, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  23. Motsinger J, Kalita P, Bhattarai R (2016) Analysis of best management practices implementation on water quality using the soil and water assessment tool. Water (Switzerland) 8(4):145. doi:10.3390/w8040145

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huber WC, Dickinson RE (1988) Storm water management model. Version 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinatti

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hubert J, Edwards T, Jahromi BA (2013) Comparative study of sustainable drainage systems. Engineering sustainability. 166 (ES3):138–149 doi: 10.1680/ensu.11.00029.

  26. Jain SK, Sudheer KP (2008) Fitting of hydrologic models: a close look at the Nash-Sutcliffe index. J Hydrol Eng 13:981–986. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:10(981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jato-Espino D, Andrés-Valeri VC, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Castro-Fresno D, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Charlesworth SM (2016a) Analysis and implementation of sustainable drainage practices under Spain’s oceanic climate conditions. 4th Annual Water Efficiency Conference, Coventry, UK https://www.watefnetwork.co.uk/files/default/resources/Conference2016/Session_Seven/59-JATO-ESPINO-1.pdf. Accessed 30 December 2016

  28. Jato-Espino D, Charlesworth SM, Bayon JR, Warwick F (2016b) Rainfall-runoff simulations to assess the potential of SuDS for mitigating flooding in highly urbanized catchments. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:149. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krebs G, Kuoppamäki K, Kokkonen T, Koivusalo H (2016) Simulation of green roof test bed runoff. Hydrol Processes 30:250–262. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10605

  30. Lashford C, Charlesworth S, Warwick F, Blackett M (2014) Deconstructing the sustainable drainage management train in terms of water quantity—preliminary results for Coventry, UK. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 42(2):187–192. doi:10.1002/clen.201300161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee S-B, Yoon C-G, Jung KW, Hwang HS (2010) Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM. Water Sci Technol 62(6):1401–1409. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MCDH (2009) Manual of contract documents for highway works. Volume 1 - specification for highway works. Series 500: drainage and service ducts. Highways Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nash JE (1958) Determining run-off from rainfall. Proc Inst Civ Eng 10:163–184

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Niazi M, Nietch C, Maghrebi M, Jackson N (2017) Storm water management model: performance review and gap analysis. J Sustainable Water Built Environ 3(2):04017002. doi: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000817

  36. Nicodeme C, Diamandouros K, Diez J, Durso C, Brecx C, Metushi S (2013) European Union Road Federation. European Road Statistics 2012. Report http://www.erf.be/images/Statistics/ER_Statistics_Final_2012.pdf. Accessed 30 December 2016

  37. Norris MJ, Pulford ID, Haynes H, Dorea CC, Phoenix VR (2013) Treatment of heavy metals by iron oxide coated and natural gravel media in sustainable urban drainage systems. Water Sci Technol 68(3):674–680. doi:10.2166/wst.2013.259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Novak P, Guinot V, Jeffrey A, Reeve DE (2010) Hydraulic modelling—an introduction: principles, methods and applications, Spon Press, New York, p 84 ISBN 0-203-86162-0

  39. Palla A, Gnecco I (2015) Hydrologic modeling of Low Impact Development systems at the urban catchment scale. J Hydrol 528:361–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050

  40. Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Andrés-Valeri VC, Ascorbe-Salcedo A, Castro-Fresno D (2016) Laboratory study on the stormwater retention and runoff attenuation capacity of four permeable pavements. J Environ Eng (United States) 142(2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001033

  41. Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Castro-Fresno D, Fernández-Barrera AH, Vega-Zamanillo Á (2012) Characterization of infiltration capacity of permeable pavements with porous asphalt surface using cantabrian fixed infiltrometer. J Hydrol Eng 17(5):597–603. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosa DJ, Clausen JC, Dietz ME (2015) Calibration and verification of SWMM for low impact development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 51:746–757. doi: 10.1111/jawr.12272

  43. Rossman L (2010) Storm water management model user’s manual. Version 5.0 (No. EPA/600/R-05/040). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sansalone J, Kuang X, Ranieri V (2008) Permeable pavement as a hydraulic and filtration interface for urban drainage. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(5):666–674. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:5(666)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Andrés-Valeri VCA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Castro-Fresno D (2014a) Field study of infiltration capacity reduction of porous mixture surfaces. Water (Switzerland) 6(3):661–669. doi:10.3390/w6030661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Charlesworth S, Castro-Fresno D, Andrés-Valeri VCA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J (2014b) Water quality and quantity assessment of pervious pavements performance in experimental car park areas. Water Sci Technol 69(7):1526–1533. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Jato-Espino D, Lashford C, Coupe S (2016) Investigation of the design considerations for highway filter drains through the comparison of stormwater management tools with laboratory simulation experiments. 9th International Conference NOVATECH: planning & technologies for sustainable urban water management. Lyon, France, 2016 http://www.novatech.graie.org/a_progr_sessions.php#A1. Accessed 30 December 2016

  48. Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Calzada-Pérez MA, Castro-Fresno D (2014c) Infiltration behaviour of polymer-modified porous concrete and porous asphalt surfaces used in SuDS techniques. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 42(2):139–145. doi:10.1002/clen.201300156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Vega-Zamanillo A, Castro-Fresno D (2013) Laboratory analysis of the infiltration capacity of interlocking concrete block pavements in car parks. Water Sci Technol 67(3):675–681. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52(3–4):591–611. doi:10.2307/2333709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Stylianides T, Frost MW, Fleming PR, Mageean M, Huetson A (2016) A condition assessment approach for highway filter drains using ground penetrating radar. Procedia Engineering 143:1226–1235. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Thomas A, Haselbach L, Poor C, Freimund M (2015) Long-term metal retention performance of media filter drains for stormwater management. Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(4):3721–3733. doi:10.3390/su7043721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. UK Department of Transports (2015). National road traffic survey https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/tra01-traffic-by-road-class-and-region-miles. Accessed 30 December 2016

  54. Whitaker S (1986) Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law. Transp Porous Media 1(1):3–25. doi:10.1007/BF01036523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Witthoeft, A.F., Conkle, C.S., Stern, A. (2014). Techniques for in situ evaluation of stormwater infiltration rate. Geotechnical Special Publication (234 GSP), pp. 3432–3443. doi: 10.1061/9780784413272.333

  56. Woods-Ballard B, Wilson S, Udale-Clark H, Illman S, Ashley R, Kellagher R (2015) The SuDS manual. CIRIA 753. CIRIA, London, p 968 ISBN 979-0-86017-760-9

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang S, Guo Y (2015) SWMM simulation of the storm water volume control performance of permeable pavement systems. J Hydrol Eng 20(8):06014010. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001092

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The laboratory research was part of a wider research project funded by the company Carnell Group Services Ltd. Daniel Jato-Espino’s research internship at Coventry University and its participation in the research that led to this article was jointly funded by the CAWR, Coventry University and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research projects RHIVU (Ref. BIA2012-32463) and SUPRIS-SUReS (Ref. BIA2015-65240-C2-1-R MINECO/FEDER, UE), financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness with funds from the State General Budget (PGE) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). A further acknowledgement was given to XP Solutions for providing a licence to use MicroDrainage®.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis A. Sañudo-Fontaneda.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sañudo-Fontaneda, L.A., Jato-Espino, D., Lashford, C. et al. Simulation of the hydraulic performance of highway filter drains through laboratory models and stormwater management tools. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 19228–19237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9170-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Highway filter drains (HFDs)
  • Low impact development (LID)
  • Rainfall-runoff simulation
  • Sustainable drainage systems (SuDS)
  • Transport infrastructure
  • Water sensitive urban design (WSUD)