Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of the environmental management system on the environmental impact of seaport companies during an economic crisis: Lithuanian case study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freight handling in EU ports fell by more than 12 % during the global economic crisis in 2008–2009 after almost a decade of continuous growth. The decrease of freight handling in the Klaipeda seaport, the only port in Lithuania, was 6.7 % and happened due to the dominant outward movement of goods (mainly oil products). The Klaipeda seaport, due to its peculiarity, is the only ice-free port in the northern part of Baltic Sea. The present study explores the environmental impact of Klaipeda seaport activities from 2001 to 2011. Moreover, it compares the environmental effectiveness of environmental protection strategies used in the four biggest companies that, in fact, cover about 88 % of total activities (except general cargo) of the seaport. The first group of targeted companies used an environmental protection strategy to implement an ISO 14001-based environmental management system, and the second group selected to follow environmental management practices without certification. The paper analyses the development of the companies’ activities in regard to the change of environmental effectiveness. The paper evaluates the pressure of the economic crisis on the companies’ activities and its influence on environmental decisions, with particular interest in the ability of different environmental protection systems to resist and handle the expected performance. The study identified a significant decrease in companies’ activities during the crisis period. However, the economic activities and environmental effectiveness demonstrated similar short-term tendencies in regard to the environmental strategy selection but differed in long-term perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acciaro M, Ghiara H, Cusano MI (2014) Energy management in seaports: a new role for port authorities. Energ Policy. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.013i

    Google Scholar 

  • Arduino G, Aronietis R, Crozet Y et al (2013) How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation. Res Transp Econ 42:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asel AJ, Posch A (2011) Squeezing or cuddling? The impact of economic crises on management control and stakeholder management. Rev Manag Sci 5:213–231. doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0051-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belous O (2005) Lithuanian business environmental management based on local agenda 21 principles. The human sustainable city: challenges and perspectives from the Habitat Agenda. Ashgate

  • Bergantino AS, Musso E, Porcelli F (2013) Port management performance and contextual variables: which relationship? Methodological and empirical issues. Res Transp Bus Manag 8:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottasso A, Conti M, Ferrari C, Tei A (2014) Ports and regional development: a spatial analysis on a panel of European regions. Transp Res A Policy 65:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulatov I, Klemeš E (2009) Towards cleaner technologies: emissions reduction, energy and waste minimisation, industrial implementation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 11:1–6. doi:10.1007/s10098-008-0177-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burskyte V, Belous O (2012) Klaipeda seaport key sustainability points. In: Ocean: past, present and future. Climate change research, ocean observation & advanced technologies for regional sustainability. IEEE/OES, pp 281–290. doi:10.1109/BALTIC.2012.6249212

  • Burskyte V, Belous O, Stasiskiene Z (2011) Sustainable development of deep-water seaport: the case of Lithuania. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:716–726. doi:10.1007/s11356-010-0415-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Celik M (2009) A hybrid design methodology for structuring an Integrated Environmental Management System (IEMS) for shipping business. J Environ Manag 90:1469–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YT (2013) Environmental efficiency of ports: a data envelopment analysis approach. Marit Policy Manage Flagship J Int Shipp Port Res 40:467–478. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.797119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbra RM, Ronza A, Casal J, Stojanovic TA, Wooldridge C (2004) The self diagnosis method a new methodology to assess environmental management in sea ports. Mar Pollut Bull 48:420–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darbra RM, Pittam N, Royston KA, Darbra JP, Journee H (2009) Survey on environmental monitoring requirements of European ports. J Environ Manag 90:1396–1403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2007) An environmental management system primer for ports: advancing port sustainability

  • Eurostat (2013) Maritime port activity in the EU27. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/7-20032013-AP/EN/7-20032013-AP-EN.PDF. Accessed 06 Jun 2014

  • Hackett B (2012) The impact of the global economic crisis on international trade. Port Planning, Design & Construction 53:29–30. http://www.porttechnology.org/technical_papers/list/P210. Accessed 16 Jun 2014

  • Heras I, Arana G (2010) Alternative models for environmental management in SMEs: the case of Ecoscan vs. ISO 14001. J Clean Prod 18:726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring H, Roy R (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation 27:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarasuniene A, Greiciune L, Sakalys A (2012) Research of competitive environment of Klaipeda Seaport comparing to other seaports in the eastern Baltic Sea region. Transport 27(1):5–13. doi:10.3846/16484142.2012.662911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopott M (2013) Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland. Marit Policy Manage Flagship J Int Shipp Port Res 40:439–450. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.798440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le XQ, Hens L, Stoyanov S (2011) Water management in the framework of environmental management systems in Bulgarian seaports. Phys Chem Earth 36:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le XQ, Vu VH, Hens L, Van Heur B (2014) Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia. J Clean Prod 64:173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania (2004) The methodical recommendations for analytical control of air pollution from the stationary sources of emissions. D1-68 (In Lithuanian language)

  • Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania (2005) Integrated pollution prevention and control regulations, permit issuance, renewal and withdrawal. D1-330 (In Lithuanian language)

  • Nanopaulos A, Tselentis BN, Woldridge DS (2005) Sustainable development of port operations: the role of research led education

  • Ondiviela B, Juanes JA, Gómez AG, Sįmano ML, Revilla JA (2012) Methodological procedure for water quality management in port areas at the EU level. Ecol Indic 13:117–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pallis AA, de Langen PW (2010) Seaports and the structural implications of the economic crisis. Res Transp Econ 27:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi JK, Pradhan A (2012) Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions for commercial seaports in India. Ocean Coast Manag 62:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi C (2013) The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: an empirical analysis. J Manag Governance 17:71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parola F, Maugeri S (2013) Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: towards a research agenda. Res Transp Bus Manag 8:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port of Klaipeda (2014) www.portofklaipeda.lt. Accessed 10 Jun 2014

  • Puig M, Wooldridge C, Darbra RM (2014) Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Mar Pollut Bull 81:124–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saengsupavanich C, Coowanitwong N, Gallardo WG, Lertsuchatavanich C (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state control-derived indicators. J Clean Prod 17:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakeniene R, Galkus A, Joksas K (2011) Pollution of Klaipeda port waters. Pol J Environ Stud 20(2):445–459

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue J (2012) Potentials for decoupling housing-related environmental impacts from economic growth. Environ Dev 4:18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Meng XH, Yin HT, Tam CM, Sun L (2010) Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J Clean Prod 18:975–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zieglera A, Nogareda JS (2009) Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: exploring the causal relationship. Res Policy 38:885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorpas A (2010) Environmental management systems as sustainable tools in the way of life for the SMEs and VSMEs. Bioresour Technol 101:1544–1557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vilma Burskyte.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anne, O., Burskyte, V., Stasiskiene, Z. et al. The influence of the environmental management system on the environmental impact of seaport companies during an economic crisis: Lithuanian case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 1072–1084 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3410-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3410-x

Keywords

Navigation