Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of a Nearly Friction-Free Stress–Strain Curve of Silicone Rubber up to a Large Strain in Compression Testing

  • Brief Technical Note
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nominal stress–strain curves of a silicone rubber specimen with a range of length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios have been measured via compression testing. The curves are highly dependent on the L/D ratio. The contact area has been measured using stamp ink applied to the sidewall of the specimen to determine the optimal L/D ratio which yields the stress–strain curve closest to the curve of the friction-free specimen. Traces of ink appear on the platen after the compression test, indicating that the phenomenon of rollover takes place. When the L/D ratio is less than 1.0, the contact area is less than that of the friction-free specimen although the phenomenon of rollover supplements the contact area. When the L/D ratio increases up to 1.0, the contact area increases toward that of the ideal specimen that deforms uniformly under the friction-free condition; the stress–strain curve of the specimen with the L/D ratio of 1.0 can be regarded as the nearly friction-free property of silicone rubber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ju ML, Jmal H, Dupuis R, Aubry E (2015) Visco-hyperelastic constitutive model for modeling the quasi-static behavior of polyurethane foam in large deformation. Polym Eng Sci 55:1795–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim W-D, Kim W-S, Woo C-S, Lee H-J (2004) Some considerations on mechanical testing methods of rubbery materials using nonlinear finite element analysis. Polym Int 53:850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gent AN, Discenzo FM, Suh JB (2009) Compression of rubber disks between frictional surfaces. Rubber Chem Technol 82:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley GL, Chang PC, Mckenna GB (2001) Rubber modeling using uniaxial test data. J Appl Polym Sci 81:837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams JG, Gamonpilas C (2008) Using the simple compression test to determine Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and the coulomb friction coefficient. Int J Solids Struct 45:4448–4459

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Doman DA, Cronin DS, Salisbury CP (2006) Characterization of polyurethane rubber at high deformation rates. Exp Mech 46:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dar UA, Zhang W, Xu Y, Wang J (2014) Thermal and strain rate sensitive compressive behavior of polycarbonate polymer-experimental and constitutive analysis. J Polym Res 21:519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansouri MR, Darijani H, Baghani M (2017) On the correlation of FEM and experiments for hyperelastic elastomers. Exp Mech 57:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mesa-Múnera E, Ramírez -Salazar JF, Boulanger P, Branch JW (2012) Inverse-FEM characterization of a brain tissue phantom to simulate compression and indentation. Ing y Cienc 8:11–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder W, Webster DA (1949) Press-forging thin sections-effect of friction, area, and thickness on pressures required. J Appl Mech ASME 16:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hill R (1998) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rand JL (1967) An analysis of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. NOLTR 67–156, White Oak

  13. Cha SH, Shin H, Kim JB (2010) Numerical investigation of frictional effects and compensation of frictional effects in split hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng A 34:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Banerjee JK (1985) Barreling of solid cylinders under axial compression. J Eng Mater Technol 107:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christiansen P, Martins PAF, Bay N (2016) Friction compensation in the upsetting of cylindrical test specimens. Exp Mech 56:1271–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan AS, Balzer JE, Wilgeroth JM, Proud WG (2014) Aspect ratio compression effects on metals and polymers. J Phys Conf Ser 500

  17. Espinosa HD, Patanella A, Fischer M (2000) A novel dynamic friction experiment using a modified Kolsky bar apparatus. Exp Mech 40:138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Basic Science Research Program under contract numbers 2017R1A6A3A11028683 (S. Kim) and 2015R1A2A2A01002454 (H. Shin) through a National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (Korea).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyunho Shin or Kyong-Yop Rhee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S., Kim, M., Shin, H. et al. Measurement of a Nearly Friction-Free Stress–Strain Curve of Silicone Rubber up to a Large Strain in Compression Testing. Exp Mech 58, 1479–1484 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-0426-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-0426-z

Keywords

Navigation