Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Residual Stresses in Cu/Ni Multilayer Thin Films Measured Using the Sin2ψ Method

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Residual stresses in multilayer thin films are of substantial importance to the service life of advanced engineering systems. In this investigation, the residual stresses in magnetron sputtered Cu/Ni multilayer thin films were characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and the sin2ψ method. The influence of layer thickness on residual stress was explored for films with alternating Ni and Cu layers with equal layer thicknesses ranging from 10 nm to 100 nm. To address peak broadening and overlapping, the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm were employed, and the peak position was determined using the Center of Gravity (CoG) method. Results showed tensile residual stress in both the Cu and Ni layers and a prominent layer thickness dependence. The stress in the Ni layers increased from roughly 880 MPa to 1550 MPa with decreasing layer thickness from 100 nm to 10 nm. In the Cu layers, the stress remained relatively constant at ~250 MPa and then substantially decreased for the 10 nm thickness. The findings confirm that the XRD-based approach can be applied for residual stress measurement in nanoscale multilayer thin films, provided that peak broadening and overlapping issues are addressed. Furthermore, the residual stress in metal multilayers is strongly dependent on layer thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 28 March 2019

    A correction has been published.

References

  1. Wang J, Zhou Q, Shao S, Misra A (2016) Strength and plasticity of nanolaminated materials. Mater Res Lett 5(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2016.1225321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Z, Wang J (2014) Orientation-dependent hardness in as-deposited and low-temperature annealed Ti/Ni multilayer thin films. J Appl Mech 82(1):011008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Z, Wang J (2016) Coupled annealing temperature and layer thickness effect on strengthening mechanisms of Ti/Ni multilayer thin films. J Mech Phys Solids 88:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Misra A, HK TEM, Nastasi M (1999) Residual stresses in polycrystalline cu/Cr multilayered thin films. J Mater Res 15(03):756–763. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2000.0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng S, Beyerlein IJ, Carpenter JS, Kang K, Wang J, Han W, Mara NA (2013) High-strength and thermally stable bulk nanolayered composites due to twin-induced interfaces. Nat Commun 4:1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Misra A, Hoagland RG, Kung H (2004) Thermal stability of self-supported nanolayered cu/Nb films. Philos Mag 84(10):1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430310001659480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan MI, Bhatti KA, Qindeel R, Althobaiti HS, Alonizan N (2017) Structural, electrical and optical properties of multilayer TiO 2 thin films deposited by sol–gel spin coating. Results Phys 7:1437–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nix WD, Clemens BM (1999) Crystallite coalescence: a mechanism for intrinsic tensile stresses in thin films. J Mater Res 14(08):3467–3473. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.1999.0468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chason E, Engwall A, Pei F, Lafouresse M, Bertocci U, Stafford G, Murphy JA, Lenihan C, Buckley DN (2013) Understanding residual stress in electrodeposited cu thin films. J Electrochem Soc 160(12):D3285–D3289. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.048312jes

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drory MD, Thouless MD, Evans AG (1988) On the decohesion of residually stressed thin films. Acta Metall 36(8):2019–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(88)90303-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Czerwinski F, Kedzierski Z (1997) On the mechanism of microcrack formation in nanocrystalline Fe–Ni electrodeposits. J Mater Sci 32(11):2957–2961. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018693005002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh SK, Limaye PK, Swain BP, Soni NL, Agrawal RG, Dusane RO, Grover AK (2007) Tribological behaviour and residual stress of electrodeposited Ni/cu multilayer films on stainless steel substrate. Surf Coat Technol 201(8):4609–4618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.09.314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoney GG (1909) The tension of metallic films deposited by electrolysis. Royal Society of London A 82:4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freund LB, Suresh S (2004) Thin film materials: stress, defect formation, and surface evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754715

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Abadias G, Chason E, Keckes J, Sebastiani M, Thompson GB, Barthel E, Doll GL, Murray CE, Stoessel CH, Martinu L (2018) Review article: stress in thin films and coatings: current status, challenges, and prospects. J Vac Sci Technol A 36(2):020801. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5011790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shull AL, Spaepen F (1996) Measurements of stress during vapor deposition of copper and silver thin films and multilayers. J Appl Phys 80(11):6243–6256. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.363701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1987) Residual stress: measurement by diffraction and interpretation. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. He BB (2009) Two-dimensional X-ray diffraction. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. He K, Chen N, Wang C, Wei L, Chen J (2018) Method for determining crystal grain size by X-ray diffraction. Cryst Res Technol 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201700157

  20. Sedighi M, Nazemnezhad R (2013) Effect of peak positioning method on accuracy of X-ray diffraction residual stress measurement. Exp Tech 40:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-016-0033-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo Q, Yang S (2017) Uncertainty of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) sin2 ψ technique in measuring residual stresses of physical vapor deposition (PVD) hard coatings. Coatings 7(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7080128

  22. Swanson HE, Tatge E (1953) Standard X-ray diffraction powder patterns, vol 1. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2012) Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bousquet O, von Luxburg U, Rätsch G (2011) Advanced lectures on machine learning: ML summer schools 2003, Canberra, Australia, February 2–14, 2003, Tübingen, Germany, august 4–16, 2003, revised lectures, vol 3176. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitra R, Hoffman RA, Madan A, Weertman JR (2011) Effect of process variables on the structure, residual stress, and hardness of sputtered nanocrystalline nickel films. J Mater Res 16(04):1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2001.0142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Misra A (2004) Residual stresses in sputter-deposited copper/330 stainless steel multilayers. J Appl Phys 96(12):7173–7178. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1813617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoudt MR, Ricker RE, Cammarata RC (2001) The influence of multilayered metallic caoting on fatigue crack nucleation. Int J Fatigue 23:S125–S223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge technical support from the Molecular Analysis Facility (MAF) of the University of Washington for the residual stress analysis. The MAF is a National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure site at the University of Washington, which is supported in part by the National Science Foundation (grant ECC-1542101), the University of Washington, the Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, the Clean Energy Institute, and the National Institutes of Health. Special thanks are extended to Liam Bradshaw for training and consultation on the use of XRD. The team would like to thank Yang Zhou of the UW for his assistance with SEM imaging, as well as Tyler Johnson of the UW for his consultation on classification algorithms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDonald, I.G., Moehlenkamp, W.M., Arola, D. et al. Residual Stresses in Cu/Ni Multilayer Thin Films Measured Using the Sin2ψ Method. Exp Mech 59, 111–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00447-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00447-2

Keywords

Navigation