Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 559–567 | Cite as

Measurement of Structural Stresses by Hole-Drilling and DIC

Article

Abstract

Evaluation of stresses in structures such as bridges, buildings, pipelines and railways is challenging because the loads cannot easily be manipulated to allow direct measurements. This paper focuses on the development of a method that combines the hole-drilling technique with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to evaluate these difficult-to-measure structural stresses. The hole-drilling technique works by relating local displacements caused by the removal of a small amount of stressed material to the original stresses within the drilled hole. Adaptation of this method to measure structural stresses requires scaling up the hole size and modifying the calculation approach to measure deeper into a material. DIC provides a robust means to measure full-field displacements that can easily be scaled to different hole sizes and corrected for typical artifacts that occur in practical on-site measurements. There are two primary areas of investigation: the adaptation of the DIC/hole-drilling method to measure structural stresses and the development of a correction method to remove coexisting stresses such as residual and machining stresses from the measurement. Experimental measurements are made to demonstrate the measurement method on different structure types including the example practical problem of measuring thermally induced stresses in railroad tracks.

Keywords

Structural stresses Hole-drilling DIC Stress datum Residual stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and by American Stress Technologies, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Dr. Richard Stock, LB Foster Rail Technologies Corp., Burnaby, Canada kindly provided rail specimens.

References

  1. 1.
    Kish A, Samavedam G (2013) Track Buckling Prevention : Theory , Safety Concepts and Applications. DOT/FRA/ORD-13/16, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGinnis MJ (2005) Application of three-dimensional digital image correlation to the Core-drilling method. Exp Mech 45(4):359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dally JW, Riley WF (1991) Experimental stress analysis. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koob MJ (2005) The Development of a Vibration Technique for Estimation of Neutral Temperature in Continuously Welded Railroad Rail. MS thesis, Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitzpatrick ME, Fry AT, Holdway P, Kandil FA, Shackleton J, Suominen L (2005) Determination of Residual Stresses X-ray Diffraction – Issue 2. Measurement Good Practice Guide, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schajer GS (ed) (2013) Practical residual stress Measurment methods. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathar J (1934) Determination of inherent stresses by measuring deformations of drilled holes. Transactions ASME 56(2):249–254Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schajer GS (2010) Hole-drilling residual stress measurements at 75: origins, advances, opportunities. Exp Mech 50(2):245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for In-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20(6)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutton MJ, Orteu J-J, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schajer GS, Winiarski B, Withers PJ (2012) Hole-drilling residual stress measurement with artifact correction using full-field DIC. Exp Mech 53(2):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM (2013) Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method. ASTM Standard Test Method E837–13. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schajer GS (1988) Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method . Part I - stress calculation procedures. J Eng Mater Technol 110(4):338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schajer GS (1988) Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole- drilling method . Part II - practical application of the integral method. J Eng Mater Technol 110(4):344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schajer GS (2005) Full-field calculation of hole drilling residual stresses from electronic speckle pattern interferometry data. Exp Mech 45(6):526–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baldi A (2013) Residual stress measurement using hole drilling and integrated digital image correlation techniques. Exp Mech 54(3):379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schajer GS, Abraham C (2014) Residual stress measurements in finite-thickness materials by hole-drilling. Exp Mech 54(9):1515–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parker RL (1994) Geophysical inverse theory. Princeton University Press, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ponslet E, Steinzig M (2003) Residual stress measurement using the hole drilling method and laser speckle interferometry part II: analysis technique. Exp Tech 27(5):45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stephenson DA, Agapiou JS (2005) Metal cutting theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blaber J, Adair B, Antoniou A (2015) Ncorr: open-source 2D digital image correlation Matlab software. Exp Mech 55(6):1105–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schleinzer G, Fischer F (2001) Residual stress formation during the roller straightening of railway rails. Int J Mech Sci 43(10):2281–2295CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations