Physiological factors associated with ski-mountaineering vertical race performance
Despite their increasing popularity, there are no studies analyzing the performance of ski-mountaineering vertical races. For the first time, this study examined a vertical competition, exploring the association between laboratory measures and uphill performance by means of multiple regression analysis.
Nine high-level ski-mountaineers (age 20.6 ± 3.0 years, VO2max 69.3 ± 7.4 mL/min/kg) performed an anthropometric assessment and a laboratory ski-mountaineering graded exercise test (GXT) to evaluate VO2max, gross efficiency (GE), ventilatory thresholds (VTs), blood lactate thresholds (LTs), as well as the power output associated with these indices. Race characteristics in terms of vertical gain, length, and mean gradient were, respectively, as follows: 460 m, 3 km, 15.3% for junior men and senior women; 600 m, 3.5 km, 17.1% for senior men.
Average race time was 23:35 ± 01:25 (mm:ss). Mean power output exerted during the race was 3.40 ± 0.34 W/kg, equal to 79.0 ± 3.5% of maximal and 95.3 ± 5.2% of VT2 calculated in the GXT. The most performance-correlated variable was the VO2 at VT2 (mL/min/kg) (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), which accounted for the 80% of performance variation (adjusted R 2 = 0.80, p = 0.001). When GE was included in the analysis, the regression model was significantly improved (adjusted R 2 = 0.90, p = 0.031).
The study showed that the mean power output sustained during a vertical race is close to the power associated with VT2 and it is highly correlated with athletes’ physiological characteristics. Particularly, two variables, VO2 at VT2 and GE, measurable with a specific GXT, accounted for the 90% of performance variation in a ski-mountaineering vertical race. Accordingly, training programs should focus on the maximal development of VT2 as well as on increasing GE by technical improvement.
KeywordsVentilatory thresholds Power output Ski-mountaineering Vertical Performance
Graded exercise test
International Ski Mountaineering Federation
Blood lactate thresholds
Maximal power output
Respiratory exchange ratio
Maximal oxygen consumption
First ventilatory threshold
Second ventilatory threshold
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures were approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee and were carried out in line with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Tosi P, Leonardi A, Schena F (2009) The energy cost of ski mountaineering: effects of speed and ankle loading. J Sports Med Phys Fit 49(1):25Google Scholar
- 5.Burnley M, Jones AM (2016) Power-duration relationship: Physiology, fatigue, and the limits of human performance. Eur J Sport Sci 1–12. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1249524
- 7.Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Ward ANN (1979) Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12(3):175–181Google Scholar
- 12.Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ (1999) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: including pathophysiology and clinical applications, vol 206. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bossi AH, Lima P, Lima JPd, Hopker J (2016) Laboratory predictors of uphill cycling performance in trained cyclists. J Sports Sci 35(14):1364–1371Google Scholar
- 33.Seiler S, TØnnessen E (2009) Intervals, thresholds, and long slow distance: the role of intensity and duration in endurance training. Sportscience 13:32–53Google Scholar
- 36.McCall A, Fanchini M, Coutts AJ (2017) Prediction: the modern day sports science/medicine ‘Quest for the Holy Grail’. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12(5):704–706Google Scholar