Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 61–70 | Cite as

The effects of conventional and oval chainrings on patellofemoral loading during road cycling: an exploration using musculoskeletal simulation

  • Jonathan Sinclair
  • Philip Stainton
  • Benjamin Sant
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to resolve muscle forces during the pedal cycle, to specifically examine the effects of chainring geometry on patellofemoral loading during cycling.

Methods

15 healthy male recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at a fixed cadence of 70 RPM in two chainring conditions (round and oval). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation and mathematical modeling approach. Differences between chainring conditions across the entire pedal cycle were examined using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping, and patellofemoral force experienced per 20 km was explored using a paired samples t test.

Results

No significant (P > 0.05) differences in patellofemoral force or stress were found throughout the pedal cycle between chainring conditions. It was also shown that no significant (P > 0.05) differences in patellofemoral force per 20-km joint were evident (round 38,576.40 N/kg s and oval = 35,637.00 N/kg s).

Conclusions

The current analysis found no effects of chainring geometry, on the forces experienced by the patellofemoral joint during the pedal cycle.

Keywords

Biomechanics Cycling Chainring Patellofemoral Pathology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Gareth Shadwell for his technical assistance. We thank Todd Pataky, Mark Robinson and Jos Vanrenterghem for their website (http://www.spm1d.org/) and for generously providing the source code for this experiment.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and the declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

All of the subjects provided written consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Ericson MO, Nisell R (1988) Efficiency of pedal forces during ergometer cycling. Int J Sports Med 9:118–122. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024991 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cordova A, Latasa I, Seco J, Villa G, Rodriguez-Falces J (2014) Physiological responses during cycling with oval chainrings (Q-Ring) and circular chainrings. J Sports Sci Med 13:410–416PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strutzenberger G, Wunsch T, Kroell J, Dastl J, Schwameder H (2014) Effect of chainring ovality on joint power during cycling at different workloads and cadences. Sports Biomech 13:97–108. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2014.908946 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hintzy F, Grappe F, Belli A (2016) Effects of a non-circular chainring on sprint performance during a cycle ergometer test. J Sports Sci Med 15:223–228PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hintzy F, Horvais N (2016) Non-circular chainring improves aerobic cycling performance in non-cyclists. Eur J Sport Sci 16:427–432. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1086817 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horvais N, Samozino P, Zameziati K, Hautier C, Hintzy F (2007) Effects of a non-circular chainring on muscular, mechanical and physiological parameters during cycle ergometer tests. Isokinet Exerc Sci 15:271–279Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peiffer JJ, Abbiss CR (2010) The influence of elliptical chainrings on 10 km cycling time trial performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 5:459–468. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.4.459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dagnese F, Carpes FP, Martins ED, Stefanyshyn D, Mota CB (2011) Effects of a noncircular chainring system on muscle activation during cycling. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 21:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bisi MC, Stagni R, Gnudi G, Cappello A (2010) Non-circular chain ring allows a reduction of joint loading in cycling. J Mech Med Biol 10:113–122. doi: 10.1142/S0219519410003228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dieter BP, McGowan CP, Stoll SK, Vella CA (2014) Muscle activation patterns and patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46:753–761. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000153 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarsen B, Krosshaug T, Bahr R (2010) Overuse injuries in professional road cyclists. Am J Sports Med 38:2494–2501. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376816 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Besier TF, Draper CE, Gold GE, Beaupre GS, Delp SL (2005) Patellofemoral joint contact area increases with knee flexion and weight-bearing. J Orthop Res 23:345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ho KY, Blanchette MG, Powers CM (2012) The influence of heel height on patellofemoral joint kinetics during walking. Gait Posture 36:271–275. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Eijden TM, Kouwenhoven E, Verburg J, Weijs WA (1986) A mathematical model of the patellofemoral joint. J Biomech 19:219–229. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90154-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elias JJ, Wilson DR, Adamson R, Cosgarea AJ (2004) Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. J Biomech 37:295–302. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00306-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Thelen DG (2007) OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:1940–1950. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Vey Mestdagh K (1998) Personal perspective in search of an optimum cycling posture. Appl Ergon 29:325–334. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00080-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menard M, Domalain M, Decatoire A, Lacouture P (2016) Influence of saddle setback on pedalling technique effectiveness in cycling. Sport Biomech 15:462–472. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1176244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sinclair J, Hebron J, Atkins S, Hurst H, Taylor PJ (2014) The influence of 3D kinematic and electromyographical parameters on cycling economy. Acta Bioeng Biomech 16:91–97. doi: 10.5277/ABB-00049-2014-02 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thelen DG, Anderson FC, Delp SL (2003) Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J Biomech 36:321–328. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00432-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Willson JD, Ratcliff OM, Meardon SA, Willy RW (2015) Influence of step length and landing pattern on patellofemoral joint kinetics during running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25:736–743. doi: 10.1111/sms.12383 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spoor CW, van Leeuwen JL (1992) Knee muscle moment arms from MRI and from tendon travel. J Biomech 25:201–206. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90276-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sinclair J, Richards J, Selfe J, Fau-Goodwin J, Shore H (2016) The influence of minimalist and maximalist footwear on patellofemoral kinetics during running. J Appl Biomech 32:359–364. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0249 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pataky TC, Robinson MA, Vanrenterghem J (2016) Region-of-interest analyses of one-dimensional biomechanical trajectories: bridging 0D and 1D theory, augmenting statistical power. Peer J 4:2652–2664. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kutzner I, Trepczynski A, Heller MO, Bergmann G (2013) Knee adduction moment and medial contact force–facts about their correlation during gait. PLoS One 8:e81036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herzog W, Longino D, Clark A (2003) The role of muscles in joint adaptation and degeneration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:305–315. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0402-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kulmala JP, Avela J, Pasanen K, Parkkari J (2013) Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45:2306–2313. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829efcf7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonacci J, Vicenzino B, Spratford W, Collins P (2014) Take your shoes off to reduce patellofemoral joint stress during running. Br J Sports Med 48:425–428. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092160 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sinclair J (2014) Effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear on knee and ankle loading during running. Clin Biomech 29:395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and WellbeingUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations