Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 19–24 | Cite as

Aerobic capacities, anaerobic power, and anthropometric characteristics of elite female canoe polo players based on playing position

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the aerobic capacities, anaerobic power, and anthropometric characteristics of elite female canoe polo players. A secondary purpose was to investigate positional differences between goalkeepers (GKs), flat 3 defenders (FDFs), and chase defenders (CHDFs).

Methods

Twenty-one elite female canoe polo players (age 26.8 ± 2.1 years; height 166.9 ± 5.2 cm; body mass 61.4 ± 7.1 kg; and percent body fat 21.0 ± 3.8%) volunteered. Anthropometric variables, peak oxygen uptake (\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)), ventilatory threshold (VT), anaerobic peak power output (PPO), and mean power output (MPO) were determined.

Results

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{ 2 {\text{peak}}}} \) was 40.88 ± 4.0 ml kg−1 min−1 or 2.50 ± 0.29 l min−1, VT was 79.1 ± 8.6 \( \% \dot{V}O_{2peak} \), PPO was 348.7 ± 32.1 W, 5.66 ± 0.64 W kg−1, and MPO was 266.5 ± 29.4 W, 4.37 ± 0.56 W kg−1. CHDFs and FDFs had significantly (p < 0.05) greater relative \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \) (19.5 and 15.0%, respectively) compared to GKs. GKs were significantly (p < 0.05) taller than CHDFs (6.3%) and FDFs (4.8%).

Conclusions

Elite female canoe polo players have well-developed oxidative and non-oxidative energy systems, as well as low percent body fat. Positional differences demonstrated that CHDFs and FDFs had significantly higher aerobic power compared to GKs; however, GKs were significantly taller. These results may assist the coach or sport scientist to construct and implement tailored training programs and may be beneficial for talent identification.

Keywords

Paddling Female canoe polo Oxygen consumption Peak power Ventilatory threshold 

Abbreviations

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

Peak oxygen uptake

\( v\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

Velocity at \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{ 2} /{\text{HR}} \)

Oxygen pulse (O2 pulse)

\( {\text{HR@}}\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

Heart rate at \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

VT

Ventilatory threshold

PPO

Peak power output

MPO

Mean power output

BP

Bench press

PBP

Prone bench pull

BMI

Body mass index

RPI

Reciprocal ponderal index

GKs

Goal keepers

FDFs

Flat 3 defenders

CHDFs

Chase defenders

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

SD

Standard deviation

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All methods performed in the study were in accordance with ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

No external financial support was received for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Forbes SC, Kennedy MD, Bell GJ (2013) Time-motion analysis, heart rate, and physiological characteristics of international canoe polo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 27:2816–2822. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280d2a2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheykhlouvand M, Khalili H, Agha-Alinejad H, Gharaat M (2016) Hormonal and physiological adaptations to high-intensity interval training in professional male canoe polo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 30:859–866. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alves CR et al (2011) Anthropometric, physiological, performance, and nutritional profile of the Brazil National canoe polo Team. J Sports Sci 30:305–311. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.638086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheykhlouvand M et al (2015) Anthropometric, physiological, and performance characteristics of elite canoe polo players. Psychol Neurosci 8:257–266. doi: 10.1037/pne0000013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferragut C et al (2011) Anthropometry and throwing velocity in elite water polo by specific playing positions. J Hum Kinet 27:31–44. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laursen PB, Shing CM, Peake JM, Coombes JS, Jenkins DG (2005) Influence of high-intensity interval training on adaptations in well-trained cyclists. J Strength Cond Res 19:527–533. doi: 10.1519/15964.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1986) A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60:2020–2027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forbes SC, Kennedy MD, Boule NB, Bell G (2014) Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women. Int J Sports Med 35:835–839. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368789 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zupan MF et al (2009) Wingate anaerobic test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and woman intercollegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 23:2598–2604. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b21b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ, Pérez CE, Pallarés JG (2014) Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 35:209–216. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351252 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE, González-Badillo JJ (2010) Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 31:123–129. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242815 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nevill A, Holder R, Watts A (2009) The changing shape of “successful” professional footballers. J Sports Sci 27:419–426. doi: 10.1080/02640410802668676 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsekouras YE et al (2005) The anthropometrical and physiological characteristics of elite water polo players. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:35–41. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1388-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bishop D (2000) Physiological predictors of flat-water kayak performance in women. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:91–97. doi: 10.1007/s004210050656 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zamparo P, Capelli C, Guerrini G (1999) Energetics of kayaking at submaximal and maximal speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80:542–548. doi: 10.1007/s004210050632 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pendergast DR, Bushnell D, Wilson DW, Cerretelli P (1989) Energetics of kayaking. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 59:342–350. doi: 10.1007/BF02389808 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buglione A, Lazzer S, Colli R, Introini E, Di Prampero PE (2011) Energetics of best performances in elite kayakers and canoeists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:877–884. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fdfdb7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garrett WE, Kirkendall DT (2000) Exercise and sport science. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKean MR, Burkett BJ (2014) The influence of upper-body strength on flat-water sprint kayak performance in elite athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9:707–714. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0301 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCluskey L et al (2010) Throwing velocity and jump height in female water polo players: performance predictors. J Sci Med Sport 13:236–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.02.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martinez JG et al (2015) Position-specific anthropometry and throwing velocity of elite female water polo players. J Strength Cond Res 29:472–477. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000646 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hill RJ, Davies PS (2002) Energy intake and energy expenditure in elite lightweight female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1823–1829. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000035370.25209.96 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bampouras TM, Marrin K (2009) Comparison of two anaerobic water polo-specific tests with the Wingate test. J Strength Cond Res 23:336–340. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181876ad0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport SciencesUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.Department of Exercise Physiology, Ardabil BranchIslamic Azad UniversityArdabilIran
  3. 3.Human KineticsOkanagan CollegePentictonCanada
  4. 4.Education and Research CommitteeIran National Canoeing, Rowing and Sailing FederationTehranIran

Personalised recommendations