Patterns of neutral and adaptive genetic diversity across the natural range of sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.)
- 536 Downloads
Demographic and environmental forces shape geographical patterns of genetic diversity. Knowledge thereof is not only important for evolutionary ecologists but, in light of future climate change, will be of interest to conservation biologists as well. Sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.) is an ecologically important species found in mixed conifer forests across western North America. We applied a candidate-gene-based environmental study to infer spatial patterns in neutral genetic variation and to identify genetic variants associated with local adaptation to drought. Using a panel of 186 candidate gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), we genotyped 313 individual trees sampled across the entire state of California, USA. We found evidence for a large-scale subdivision into two genetic clusters along the latitudinal axis and increased genetic similarity among sugar pines within a 200–300-km boundary. Associating allelic to environmental variation indicated nine putative SNPs related to local adaptation to drought. These results provide insights into neutral population structure across the natural range of sugar pine and further substantiated a key role of the mitochondrial import inner membrane machinery in enhanced tolerance to drought and constitute important steps into unravelling the eco-evolutionary dynamics in sugar pine.
KeywordsSugar pine Pinus lambertiana Dougl. Drought tolerance Adaptation Candidate-gene based environmental study
We are very much indebted to J. Liechty for his bioinformatical assistance. We wish to express our gratitude to J. Gleason and J. Dunlap from the US Forest Service for all the logistic support when collecting seed samples at Placerville, CA, USA, and providing all the necessary metadata. A postdoctoral fellowship from the Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF) and a travel grant from the Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO) was granted to CV.
Data archiving statement
Genotype and environmental data have been deposited in the TreeGenes Database (accession number TGDR059).
- Angell N, Waring KM, Graves TA (2013) Predicting height growth of sugar pine regeneration using stand and individual tree characteristics. Forestry 1–13, doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpt1028.
- Farjon A, Filer DL (2013) An atlas of the world’s conifers: an analysis of their distribution, biogeography, diversity and conservation status. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Ferrell GT (1996) The influence of insect pests and pathogens on Sierra forests. In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress (ed. Erman, D.C.). University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, pp 1177–1192Google Scholar
- Günther T, Coop G (2013) Robust Identification of Local Adaptation from Allele Frequencies. Genetics 195:205–220Google Scholar
- Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet 6:1–6Google Scholar
- Kitzmiller JH (2004) Adaptive genetic variation in Sugar pine. In: Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability, and pest resistance (ed. Sniezko R). Proceedings Conference IUFRO Working Party 2.02.15. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. RMRS-P-32. p 103–123Google Scholar
- Laudenslayer WF, Darr HH (1990) Historical effects of logging on forests of the Cascade and Sierra Nevada ranges of California. Trans West Wildl Soc 26:12–23Google Scholar
- Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6:7–11Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
- SAS Institute (2008) The SAS system for Windows. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar