Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of mandarin germplasm by nuclear, chloroplastic and mitochondrial markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mandarin horticultural varietal group (a basic taxon of the cultivated citrus (Citrus reticulata)) is highly polymorphic. It includes also genotypes introgressed by other species. The precise contribution of ancestral species to the mandarin group is not known. The goals of this work were (1) to characterise the mandarin germplasm using nuclear (simple sequence repeat (SSR), indel, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)), chloroplastic and mitochondrial markers; (2) to evaluate genetic diversity and detect redundancies; (3) to determine the possible presence of citrus ancestral genome introgressions into the mandarin genome; and (4) to determine the genetic structure within the mandarin group. Fifty microsatellites (SSRs), 24 insertion-deletions (indels), 67 SNPs, 8 chloroplastic SSRs (cpDNA) and 4 mitochondrial (mtDNA) indel markers were analysed for 191 genotypes, including the 4 main citrus ancestral species (C. reticulata, C. maxima, C. medica and C. micrantha) and Fortunella. C. maxima was the main genome introgressed in the mandarin germplasm. Seven clusters were revealed by Structure analysis at the nuclear level (N) within the mandarin germplasm. At least four of these clusters showed a clear introgression from other ancestral species. Moreover, most of the mandarins appeared to be complex mixtures of these groups. The maternal indel analysis (mtDNA and cpDNA) revealed ten cytotypes in which mandarins were represented in seven of them. This work provides new insights into the organisation of the mandarin germplasm and its structure at the nuclear and cytoplasmic levels and will be useful to design more efficient breeding programmes and management of citrus germplasm collections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleza P, Froelicher Y, Schwarz S, Hernández M, Juárez J, Morillon R, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2011) Tetraploidization events by chromosome doubling of nucellar cells are frequent in apomictic citrus and are dependent on genotype and environment. Ann Bot 108:37–50

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (2006) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). TAG Theor Appl Genet 112:1519–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley NA, Krueger RR, Federici CT, Roose ML (2009) What phylogeny and gene genealogy analyses reveal about homoplasy in citrus microsatellite alleles. Plant Syst Evol 282:71–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett H, Rhodes A (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry GH, Gmitter FG Jr, Chen C, Roose ML, Federici CT, McCollum GT (2015) Investigating the parentage of ‘Orri’ and ‘Fortune’ mandarin hybrids. Acta Hortic 1065:449–456. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1065.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Mabberley DJ, Morton C et al (2009) A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily (Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences. Am J Bot 96:668–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Goudet J, Chikhi L, Bonhomme F (2002) GENETIX v. 4.03, logiciel sous windows pour la génétique des populations. In Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France). Available at [http://www.univ-montp2.fr)].

  • Cheng Y, De Vicente MC, Meng H, Guo W, Tao N et al (2005) A set of primers for analyzing chloroplast DNA diversity in citrus and related genera. Tree Physiol 25:661–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coletta-Filho HD, Machado MA, Targon MLPN, Moreira MCPQDG, Pompeu Júnior J (1998) Analysis of the genetic diversity among mandarins (citrus spp.) using RAPD markers. Euphytica 102:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca J, Froelicher Y, Aleza P, Juarez J, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2011) Multilocus half-tetrad analysis and centromere mapping in citrus: evidence of SDR mechanism for 2n megagametophyte production and partial chiasma interference in mandarin cv ‘Fortune’. Heredity 107:462–470

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curk et al (2014) Next generation haplotyping to decipher nuclear genomic interspecific admixture in Citrus species: analysis of chromosome 2. BMC Genet 15:1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curk F, Ancillo G, Ollitrault F, Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, Garcia-Lor A, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2015) Nuclear species-diagnostic SNP markers mined from 454 amplicon sequencing reveal admixture genomic structure of modern Citrus varieties. PLoS ONE 10:e0125628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125628

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanciullino AL, Tomi F, Luro F, Desjobert JM, Casanova J (2006) Chemical variability of peel and leaf oils of mandarins. Flavour Fragrance J 21:359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW, Roose ML (1998) Phylogenetic relationships within the genus citrus (rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 96:812–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT database (2013) The state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/.

  • Froelicher Y, Dambier D, Bassene JB, Costantino G, Lotfy S, Didout C, Beaumont V, Brottier P, Risterucci AM, Luro F, Ollitrault P (2008) Characterization of microsatellite markers in mandarin orange (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Mol Ecol Resour 8:119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froelicher Y, Mouhaya W, Bassene JB, Costantino G, Kamiri M et al (2011) New universal mitochondrial PCR markers reveal new information on maternal citrus phylogeny. Tree Genet Genomes 7:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furr JR (1964) New tangerines for the desert. Calif Citrog 49:266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2012) Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: a perspective for genetic association studies. Mol Gen Genomics 287:77–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lor A, Curk F, Snoussi-Trifa H, Morillon R, Ancillo G et al (2013a) A nuclear phylogenetic analysis; SNPs, indels and SSRs deliver new insights into the relationships in the “true citrus fruit trees” group (citrinae, rutaceae) and the origin of cultivated species. Ann Bot 111:1–19

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lor A, Ancillo G, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2013b) Citrus (Rutaceae) SNP markers based on Competitive Allele­Specific PCR; transferability across the Aurantioideae subfamily. Applications in Plant Sciences 1: doi:10.3732/apps.1200406.

  • Green RM, Vardi A, Galun E (1986) The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera. Theor Appl Genet 72:170–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai M, Mitsue S, Kita K, Kajiura I (1990) A survey and isozyme analysis of wild mandarin, tachibana (Citrus tachibana (Mak.) Tanaka) growing in Japan. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 59:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson RW (1967) Horticultural varieties of citrus. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 431–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaçar YA, Uzun A, Polat I, Yesiloglu T, Yilmaz B et al (2013) Molecular characterization and genetic diversity analysis of mandarin genotypes by SSR and SRAP markers. J Food, Agric Environ 11:516–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamiri M, Stift M, Srairi I, Costantino G, Moussadik AE, Hmyene A, Bakry F, Ollitrault P, Froelicher Y (2011) Evidence for non-disomic inheritance in a Citrus interspecific tetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulata and C. limon using SSR markers and cytogenetic analysis. Plant Cell Rep 30:1415–1425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kijas JMH, Thomas MR, Fowler JCS, Roose ML (1997) Integration of trinucleotide microsatellites into a linkage map of Citrus. Theor Appl Genet 94:701–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler-Santos P, Dornelles ALC, Freitas LB (2003) Characterization of mandarin citrus germplasm from Southern Brazil by morphological and molecular analyses. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 38:797–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RR, Roose ML (2003) Use of molecular markers in the management of citrus germplasm resources. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:827–837

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RR, Navarro L (2007) Citrus germplasm resources. In: Khan I (ed) Citrus genetics, breeding and biotechnology. CABI Publishing, Wallington, pp 45–140

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li WB, Liu GF, He SW (1992) Leaf isozymes of mandarin. Proc Int Soc Citricult 1:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Muse S (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21:2128–2129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lota ML, Serra DR, Tomi F, Casanova J (2000) Chemical variability of peel and leaf essential oils of mandarins from citrus reticulata blanco. Biochem Syst Ecol 28:61–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luro FL, Costantino G, Terol J, Argout X, Allario T, Wincker P, Talon M, Ollitrault P, Morillon R (2008) Transferability of the EST-SSRs developed on Nules clementine (Citrus clementina Hort ex Tan) to other Citrus species and their effectiveness for genetic mapping. BMC Genomics 9:287

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley D (1997) A classification for edible citrus (rutaceae). Telopea 7:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton CM (2009) Phylogenetic relationships of the Aurantioideae (Rutaceae) based on the nuclear ribosomal DNAITS region and three noncoding chloroplast DNA regions, atpB-rbcL spacer, rps16, and trnL-trnF. Org Divers Evol 9:52–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi T, Matsuyama T, Akihama T (1992) DNA fingerprinting in citrus cultivars. Proc Int Soc Citriculture: 221–224.

  • Nicolosi E, Deng ZN, Gentile A, Malfa S, Continella G et al (2000) Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 100:1155–1166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ollitrault P, Terol J, Garcia-Lor A, Berard A, Chauveau A et al (2012a) SNP mining in C. clementina BAC end sequences; transferability in the Citrus genus (rutaceae), phylogenetic inferences and perspectives for genetic mapping. BMC Genomics 13:13

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ollitrault P, Terol J, Chen C, Federici C, Lotfy S et al (2012b) A reference genetic map of C. clementina hort. ex Tan.; citrus evolution inferences from comparative mapping. BMC Genomics 13:593

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penjor T, Yamamoto M, Uehara M, Ide M, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto R, Nagano Y (2013) Phylogenetic relationships of citrus and its relatives based on matK gene sequences. PLoS ONE 8:e62574

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet J (2006) DARwin software. Available at http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin 5.0.158.

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swingle W, Reece P (1967) The botany of citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 190–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T (1954) Species problem in Citrus (Revisio aurantia cearum IX). Japanese Society for Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan, pp 1–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T (1977) Fundamental discussion of citrus classification. Studia Citrologia 14:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia Campos E, Gutiérrez Espinosa MA, Warburton ML, Santacruz Varela A, Villegas Monter Á (2005) Characterization of mandarin (Citrus spp.) using morphological and AFLP markers. Interciencia 30:687–693, Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33911005 ISSN 0378–1844

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber HJ (1943) Cultivated varieties of citrus. In: Anonymous the Citrus industry. History, World Distribution, Botany and Varieties, California, pp 475–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U, Murat F et al (2014) Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol 32:656–663

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1969) The theory of gene frequencies. In: Anonymous evolution and the genetics of populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M, Tominaga S (2003) High chromosomal variability of mandarins (citrus spp.) revealed by CMA banding. Euphytica 129:267–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M, Kobayashi S, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y (1993) Phylogenic relationships of Citrus revealed by diversity of cytoplasmic genomes. In: Hayashi T, Omura M, Scott NS (eds) Techniques on gene diagnosis and breeding in fruit trees. Res Sta, Okitsu, Japan, pp 39–46

  • Yamamoto M, Tsuchimochi Y, Ninomiya T, Koga T, Kitajima A, Yamasaki A, Inafuku-Teramoto S, Yang X, Yang X, Zhong G, Nasir N, Kubo T and Tominaga S (2013) Diversity of chloroplast DNA in various mandarins (Citrus spp.) and other citrus demonstrated by CAPS analysis. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82: 106-113

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant (AGL2011-26490) from the Ministry of Economy and Innovation-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Navarro.

Additional information

Communicated by W.-W Guo

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Population Structure

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 651 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 17.9 kb)

ESM 3

(DOC 213 kb)

ESM 4

(DOC 39 kb)

ESM 5

(DOC 55 kb)

ESM 6

(PPT 127 kb)

ESM 7

(DOC 225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia-Lor, A., Luro, F., Ollitrault, P. et al. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of mandarin germplasm by nuclear, chloroplastic and mitochondrial markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes 11, 123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0951-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0951-1

Keywords

Navigation