International Advances in Economic Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 47–63 | Cite as

Dependence of Informal Interest Rates and Level of Lenders’ Influence in the Informal Loan Market in Thailand



Informal finance with usurious interest rates seems to be the last resort for the poor in many developing countries. In Thailand, informal credit lenders can freely set up extortionate interest rates and use controversial enforcement actions to pressure borrowers to repay loans, because that legal enforcement is not practical due to the low punishment levels for those lenders. Despite widespread interest in the determinants of the informal interest rates, it remains a largely unexplored area. This study investigates whether level of lenders’ influence over the borrower, and some characteristics of the borrowers, are related to informal interest rates, enabling the rates to be classified into particular categories. Ordered logistic regression is used to analyze the data. The investigation was based on information collected in a survey presented to a sampled population of 694 participants from Bangkok, Nonthaburi, Phathum Thani, and Samut Prakan where the number of informal loans during the last seven years is highest when compared to other regions of the country. The results suggest that the level of lenders’ influence over the borrower in order to obtain a loan correlates with the informal interest rates applied. Moreover, some characteristics of a borrower, i.e., debt-to-income ratio and high level of familiarity between an informal lender and a borrower, also significantly affect the rates.


Informal interest rates Level of lenders’ influence Informal loan 

JEL Classification



  1. Aleem, I. (1990). Imperfect information, screening, and the costs of informal lending: a study of a rural credit market in Pakistan. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, T. B., & Malchow-Møller, N. (2006). Strategic interaction in undeveloped credit markets. Journal of Development Economics, 80(2), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bangkok Post (2017a). Extortionists in uniform ‘were also loan sharks’. Accessed Aug 2017.
  4. Bangkok Post (2017b). Nano and picofinance schemes bearing fruit. Accessed Aug 2017.
  5. Bank of Ayudhya (2017). Personal loan. Accessed Nov 2017.
  6. Basu, K. (1983). The emergence of isolation and interlinkage in rural markets. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjee, M., & Rajeev, M. (2010). Interest rate formation in informal credit markets in India: Does level of development matter?. BWPI Working Paper 126.
  8. Bolnick, B. R. (1992). Moneylenders and informal financial markets in Malawi. World Development, 20(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bose, P. (1998). Formal-informal sector interaction in rural credit markets. Journal of Development Economics, 56(2), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boucher, S., & Guirkinger, C. (2007). Risk, wealth, and sectoral choice in rural credit markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4), 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bridges, S., & Disney, R. (2010). Debt and depression. Journal of Health Economics, 29(3), 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charles, G., & Mori, N. (2016). Effects of collateral on loan repayment: evidence from an informal lending institution. Journal of African Business, 17(2), 254–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finmark Trust (2017). FinScope Consumer Survey. Accessed Nov 2017.
  14. Finnegan, G., & Singh, A. (2004). Role of the informal sector in coping with economic crisis in Thailand and Zambia. SEED Working Paper 42.
  15. Gestel, T. V., & Baesens, B. (2008). Credit risk management: basic concepts: financial risk components, rating analysis, models, economic and regulatory capital. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ghate, P. B. (1992). Interaction between the formal and informal financial sectors: The Asian experience. World Development, 20(6), 859–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghosh, P., & Ray, D. (2016). Information and enforcement in informal credit markets. Economica, 83(329), 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haugen, N. (2005). The informal credit market: a study of default and informal lending in Nepal. Department of Economics, University of Bergen. Available at: Accessed Oct 2016.
  19. Hoff, K., Braverman, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1993). The economics of rural organization: theory, practice, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Interest Rate Control Act, B.E. 2560 (2017). Retrieved from Accessed Feb 2016.
  21. Islam, A., Nguyen, C., & Smyth, R. (2015). Does microfinance change informal lending in village economies? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeromi, P. D. (2007). Regulation of informal financial institutions: a study of money lenders in Kerala. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 28(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  23. Karlan, D., Mobius, M., Rosenblat, T., & Szeidl, A. (2009). Trust and social collateral. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1307–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kedir, A. (2003). Determinants of access to credit and loan amount: Household-level evidence from urban Ethiopia. Presented at International Conference on Development Studies in Ethiopia,
  25. Kochar, A. (1997). An empirical investigation of rationing constraints in rural credit markets in India. Journal of Development Economics, 53(2), 339–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krewski, D., & Rao, J. N. K. (1981). Inference from stratified samples: properties of the linearization, jackknife, and balanced repeated replication methods. The Annals of Statistics, 9(5), 1010–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, J., & Hsu, S. (2009). Informal finance in China: American and Chinese Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mallick, D. (2012). Microfinance and moneylender interest rate: evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 40(6), 1181–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menkhoff, L., Neuberger, D., & Rungruxsirivorn, O. (2012). Collateral and its substitutes in emerging markets’ lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(3), 817–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohieldin, M. S., & Wright, P. W. (2000). Formal and informal credit markets in Egypt. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Statistical Office of Thailand (NSO) (2016). The household socio-economic survey whole kingdom. Accessed Sept 2016.
  32. Onchan, T. (1985). Informal credit and the development of non-farm enterprises in Thailand. Research paper prepared for USAID.
  33. Orso, C. E. (2009). Formal and informal sectors: interactions between moneylenders and traditional banks in the rural Indian credit market. POLIS Working papers 151.
  34. Pellegrina, L. D. (2011). Microfinance and investment: a comparison with bank and informal lending. World Development, 39(6), 882–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robert, H., Pochanukul, P., & Achavanuntakul, S. (2013). Qualitative demand-side research report. Asian Development Bank. Available at: Accessed Oct 2016.
  36. Román, L. (1999). Institutions in transition: Vietnamese state bank reform. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siamwalla, A., Pinthong, C., Poapongsakorn, N., Satsanguan, P., Nettayarak, P., Mingmaneenakin, W., & Tubpun, Y. (1990). The Thai rural credit system: public subsidies, private information, and segmented markets. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sondergaard, L. M., Luo, X., Jithitikulchai, T., Poqqi, C., Lathapipat, D., Smita, K., … Arin, T. (2016). Thailand-systematic country diagnostic: getting back on track-reviving growth and securing prosperity for all. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. Retrieved November 2017,
  39. StataCorp. (2011). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  40. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  41. The Nation (2016). Nationwide crackdown on Thailand’s largest loan shark gang. Accessed Dec 2016.
  42. The Siam Commercial Bank (2017). Speedy loan. Accessed Nov 2017.
  43. The University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce (2016). Retrieved from Accessed Sept 2016.
  44. Turvey, C. G., & Kong, R. (2010). Informal lending amongst friends and relatives: can microcredit compete in rural China? China Economic Review, 21(4), 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yotopoulos, P. A., & Floro, S. L. (1992). Income distribution, transaction costs and market fragmentation in informal credit markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(3), 303–326.Google Scholar
  46. Yuan, Y., & Gao, P. (2012). Farmers’ financial choices and informal credit markets in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 4(2), 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yuan, Y., & Xu, L. (2013). What determine the interest rates in China’s informal market? Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 11(3), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zeller, M. (1994). Determinants of credit rationing: a study of informal lenders and formal credit groups in Madagascar. World Development, 22(12), 1895–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations