Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 91–100 | Cite as

Does Competition Lead Firms to Bribery? A Firm-Level Study in Southeast Asia

  • Ruohan Wu


Economists have paid close attention to economic development in Southeast Asia, where corruption and bribery are believed to be ubiquitous. In this article, we study the reasons why firms bribe. Specifically, we study the effects of the competition encountered by Southeast Asian firms on their bribing behavior. This article focuses on two types of bribing behavior: (1) informal payments given to the government so that it will ignore rule violations and (2) informal payments to the government to secure a contract. Using firm-level and country-level data from Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Vietnam between 2009 and 2014, we find that the market competition will increase bribing behavior, while political competition within the country will reduce the likelihood of bribing.


Bribe Southeast Asia Firms Market competition Political competition 


D21 O10 O53 


  1. Arvis, J.-F., & Berenbeim, R. (2003). Fighting corruption in East Asia: solutions from the private sector. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at
  2. Barth, J., Lin, C., Lin, P., & Song, F. M. (2009). Corruption in Bank lending to firms: Cross-country micro evidence on the beneficial role of competition and information sharing. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(3), 361–388 Available at Scholar
  3. Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jensen, J., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. The American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268–1290 Available at Scholar
  4. Birhanu, A. G., Gambardella, A., & Valentini, G. (2015). Bribery and investment: Firm-level evidence from Africa and Latin America. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1865–1877 Available at Scholar
  5. Chen, C. W., Cullen, J., & Parboteeah, K. (2015). Are manager-controlled firms more likely to bribe than shareholder-controlled firms: A cross-cultural analysis. Management and Organization Review, 11(02), 343–365 Available at Scholar
  6. Cheung, Y. L., Rau, R. and Stouraitis, A. (2012). How much do firms pay as bribes and what benefits do they get? Evidence from corruption cases worldwide (no. w17981). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at
  7. Clarke, G., & Xu, L. (2004). Privatization, competition, and corruption: How characteristics of bribe takers and payers affect bribes to utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2067–2097 Available at Scholar
  8. Collins, J., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89–108 Available at Scholar
  9. Freund, C., Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Rijkers, B. (2016). Deals and delays: Firm-level evidence on corruption and policy implementation times. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(2), 1–29 Available at Scholar
  10. Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31 Available at Scholar
  11. Henisz, W. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355–389 Available at Scholar
  12. Kasuga, H. (2013). Why do firms pay bribes? Firm-level evidence from the Cambodian garment industry. Journal of International Development, 25(2), 276–292 Available at Scholar
  13. Lee, S. H., Oh, K., & Eden, L. (2010). Why do firms bribe? Management International Review, 50(6), 775–796 Available at Scholar
  14. Martin, K., Cullen, J., Johnson, J., & Parboteeah, K. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1401–1422 Available at Scholar
  15. Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725 Available at Scholar
  16. Sharma, C., & Mitra, A. (2015). Corruption, governance and firm performance: Evidence from Indian enterprises. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(5), 835–851 Available at Scholar
  17. Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross-section of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207–230 Available at Scholar
  18. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index (2009–2014). Available at Date last accessed: 12 Aug 2017.
  19. World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (2009–2014). Available at Date last accessed: 12 Aug 2017.
  20. World Bank, World Development Indicators (1980–2014). Available at Date last accessed: 12 Aug 2017.
  21. Wu, X. (2005). Corporate governance and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 18(2), 151–170 Available at Scholar
  22. Wu, X. (2009). Determinants of bribery in Asian firms: Evidence from the world business environment survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 75–88 Available at Scholar
  23. Wu, R. (2016). Why do firms bribe? An empirical study in BRICS economies from 2002 to 2012. Economics and Business Letters, 5(3), 72–79 Available at Scholar
  24. Zhou, X., Han, Y., & Wang, R. (2013). An empirical investigation on firms’ proactive and passive motivation for bribery in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 461–472 Available at Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Business AdministrationAlabama State UniversityMontgomeryUSA

Personalised recommendations