Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 317–331 | Cite as

The Economic Impact of Brexit: Evidence from Modelling Free Trade Agreements

  • Ansgar BelkeEmail author
  • Daniel Gros
Article

Abstract

This paper assesses the economic implications of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU). The basic data on trade in goods and services and investment between the two parties suggest that the cost of “Brexit” could be substantial. Trade between the UK and the EU-27 is large and of a similar order of magnitude as transatlantic trade (between the EU and the U.S.). The precise nature of the (hopefully free) trade agreement UK-EU-27 is still being negotiated. All available studies concur that a significant disruption of trade links will impose economic costs on both sides. However, the EU-27 would bear only a disproportionally small share of the total cost, not just because it is about five times larger than the UK in economic terms, but also for fundamental reasons such as greater market power of its enterprises. Other studies on different free trade arrangements confirm the general proposition that the smaller party has more to gain from eliminating trade barriers (and more to lose from imposing them). This implies that the EU will have a stronger negotiating position.

Keywords

Brexit European Union Free trade agreements Trade in goods and services FDI 

JEL

F15 C63 C68 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper profited very much from insights gained from the participants in the panel “The Macroeconomics and Political Economy of Brexit”, 83rd International Atlantic Economic Conference, March 22-25, 2017, Berlin, Michael Burda, Henrik Enderlein and Michael Wohlgemuth. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Aichele, R., & Felbermayr, G. (2015). Costs and benefits of a United Kingdom exit from the European Union. Guetersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/NW_BREXIT_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Aichele, R., Felbermayr, G., & Heiland, I. (2014). Going deep: The trade and welfare effects of TTIP. CESifo Working Paper 5150, Munich. Available at: http://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/publications/working-papers/CESifoWP/CESifoWPdetails?wp_id=19148232.
  3. Belke, A., Dubova, I., & Osowski, T. (2017). Policy uncertainty and international financial markets: The case of Brexit. Applied Economics, 49(45), 4521–4529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz, Sebastian, and Erdal Yalcin (2013). Ökonomische Effekte eines Freihandelsabkommens zwischen Japan und der EU. ifo Schnelldienst 66: 35–40.Google Scholar
  5. Booth, S., Howarth, C., & Persson, M. (2015). What if…? The consequences, challenges and opportunities facing Britain outside EU. Open Europe Report, 3, 15.Google Scholar
  6. Breuss, F. (2006). Austria and Switzerland – Experiences with and without EU membership. Austrian Economic Quarterly, 1, 13–39.Google Scholar
  7. Burrell, A., Ferrari, E., González Mellado, A., Himics, M., Michalek, J., Shrestha, S., & van Doorslaer, B. (2011). Potential EU-Mercosur free trade agreement: Impact assessment, volume 1: Main results, JRC Reference Reports, European Commission, Brussels. Available at: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=4819.
  8. Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2014). Economic growth and political integration: Estimating the benefits from membership in the European Union using the synthetic counterfactuals method. IZA Discussion Paper no. 8162, Institute for the Study of labor, Bonn. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp8162.pdf.
  9. CBP Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (2006). Worldscan: a model for international economic policy analysis. Available at: http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/worldscan-model-international-economic-policy-analysis.
  10. CEPII/ATLASS (2010). The economic impact of the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and Korea. Report for the European Commission DG Trade (framework contract TRADE/07/A2: Korea II), Brussels. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/may/tradoc_146174.pdf.
  11. Decreux, Yvan, and Hugo Valin (2007). MIRAGE, Updated version of the model for trade policy analysis: Focus on agriculture and dynamics. CEPII Working Paper 2007/15, Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales, Paris. Available at : http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/publications/wp/abstract.asp?NoDoc=958.
  12. Ecorys (2015). Ex-post evaluation of the implementation of the EU-Mexico free trade agreement, Interim technical report, client: European Commission - DG trade, Rotterdam, 11 May. Available at: http://www.fta-evaluation.com/mexico/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/06/REVISED-Mexico-ITR-ex-post-11May.pdf.
  13. Emerson, M., Busse, M., Di Salvo, M., Gros, D., & Pelkmans, J. (2017). An assessment of the economic impact of Brexit on the EU27. Briefing Paper for the internal market and Consumer Protection Committee of the European Parliament, Brussels, January. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU%282017%29595374.
  14. European Commission (2011). A Trade SIA relating to the negotiation of a comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada. Draft final report, Trade 10/B3/B06, Brussels, web: www.eucanada-sia.org.
  15. European Commission (2013). Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: The economic analysis explained. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/september/tradoc_151787.pdf.
  16. European Commission (2015). Impact assessment, accompanying the document Recommendation for a council decision authorising the European Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to open negotiations and to negotiate with Mexico a modernised global agreement. Commission Staff Working Document SWD (2015) 289 final, Brussels, 16 December. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2015/swd_2015_0289_en.pdf.
  17. European Commission (2017) Trade, countries and regions: United States. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/united-states/.
  18. European Commission and Government of Canada (2008). Assessing the costs and benefits of a closer EU-Canada economic partnership. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2008/october/tradoc_141032.pdf.
  19. Felbermayr, G., Mitra, D., Aichele, R., & Groeschl, J. (2016). Europe and India: Relaunching a troubled trade relationship, ifo Forschungsberichte no. 80, Ifo Center for International Economics, IFO Institute, Munich. Available at: https://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/infoservice/News/2017/05/news-20170530-fober-80.html.
  20. Felbermayr, G., Kimura, F., Okubo, T., Steininger, M., Yalcin, E. (2017). On the economics of an EU-Japan free trade agreement. GED Study, study of the Ifo institute on behalf of the Bertelsmann foundation, final report, march 3. Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/NW_EU-Japan_FTA.pdf.
  21. Francois, J., Manchin, M., Norberg, H (2016). Trade sustainability impact assessment of the free trade agreement between the EU and Japan: Final report. Technical Report for the European Commission, Brussels. Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/may/tradoc_154522.pdf.
  22. Her Majesty’s (HM) Treasury (2016). HM Treasury analysis: the long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives. Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor of the Exchequer by command of Her Majesty, Cm 925, April. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hm-treasury-analysis-the-long-term-economic-impact-of-eu-membership-and-the-alternatives.
  23. Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M. G., & Tsamboulas, D. (2010). The gravity model specification for modeling international trade flows and free trade agreement effects: A 10-year review of empirical studies. Open Economics Journal, 3, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawless, Martina, and Edgar Morgenroth (2016). The product and sector level impact of a hard Brexit across the EU. ESRI Working Paper no. 550, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin. Available at: http://www.esri.ie/pubs/WP550.pdf.
  25. OECD (2016a). The economic consequences of Brexit – A taxing decision. OECD Policy Paper no. 16, organisation for economic co-operation and development, Paris, April. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/eco/The-Economic-consequences-of-Brexit-27-april-2016.pdf.
  26. OECD (2016b). OECD Stat. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/.
  27. Ottaviano, G., Dhingra, S., Huang, H., Pessoa, J. P., Sampson, T., & van Reenen, J. (2016). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: Trade effects. Centre for Economic Performance Technical Report. London School of Economics, London: Centre for Economic Performance Available at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit02_technical_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
  28. Rojas-Romagosa, Hugo (2016). Trade effects of Brexit for the Netherlands. CPB Background Document, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, Rotterdam, June. Available at: http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/trade-effects-of-brexit-for-the-netherlands.
  29. Roy, A., & Mathur, S. K. (2016). Brexit and India-EU free trade agreement. Journal of Economic Integration, 31(4), 740–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Serrano, C., Martínez, A., Rodríguez, A., & Salazar, S. (2015). Evaluation of the effects of the free trade agreement between the European Union and Mexico on bilateral trade and investment. BBVA Working Paper 15/14, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Madrid. Available at: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/DT15-14_FTAEUM.pdf.
  31. Straathof, B., Linders, G.-J., Lejour, A., & Moehlmann, J. (2008). The internal market and the Dutch economy: Implications for trade and economic growth, CPB Document No. 168. Rotterdam: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Available at: http://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/internal-market-and-dutch-economy-implications-trade-and-economic-growth.pdf.Google Scholar
  32. The Telegraph (2017). Theresa May’s Brexit speech in full. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/17/theresa-mays-brexit-speech-full/.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)BonnGermany
  3. 3.EssenGermany
  4. 4.Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations