The effects of police contracting on crime: An examination of Compton, California

Article

Abstract

Objectives

The utility of police consolidation, and in particular police contracting of services, has received widespread attention in academic and practitioner circles. However, the bulk of empirical research centers on potential fiduciary benefits; only limited scholarship has explored the possibility that changes in police services may correspond with differences in crimes solved and offenses observed. To address this gap, we examine consolidation in police services in a historically high crime, disadvantaged urban setting (Compton, California), which began contracting with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LACSD) after the closure of Compton Police Department in 2000.

Methods

Independent samples difference in means tests are used to examine variations in crime clearance rates prior to and following the transition in Compton. Group-based trajectory analysis combined with difference-in-difference regression estimation is used to assess changes in criminal offenses while minimizing selection differences in comparison settings.

Results

With the exception of homicide, clearance rates for six Part I crimes experienced statistically significant improvements in Compton’s post-contractual period. Additionally, while the vast majority of Part I offenses remained stable during the transition to LACSD policing, burglary crime rates experienced a statistically significant and sustained decline, net of controls.

Conclusions

A primary concern with police contracting centers on a lack of local police control, disconnect between local needs and actual services provided, and the potential for backlash related to a reduction in the quality of police services. Our findings from Compton suggest that contracting with a well-resourced agency experienced in police consolidation has the ability to maintain and, in some circumstances, improve the quality of law enforcement services.

Keywords

Police consolidation Contracting Police services Group-based trajectory analysis 

References

  1. Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. The American Economic Review, 93, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berk, R., & MacDonald, J. M. (2008). Overdispersion and Poisson regression. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumstein, A., & Rosenfeld, R. (1998). Explaining recent trends in US homicide rates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1175–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (2000). The recent rise and fall of American violence. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119–170.Google Scholar
  6. Boydstun, J. E. (1975). San Diego field interrogation: Final report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Braga, A. A., & Dusseault, D. (2016). Can homicide detectives improve homicide clearance rates? Crime & Delinquency (online first).Google Scholar
  8. Brandl, S. G., & Frank, J. (1994). The relationship between evidence, detective effort, and the disposition of burglary and robbery investigations. American Journal of Police, 13, 149–168.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, D. L., & Carter, J. G. (2016). Effective police homicide investigations: Evidence from seven cities with high clearance rates. Homicide Studies, 20, 150–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaiken, J. M., Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1977). The criminal investigation process: A summary report. Policy Analysis, 3, 187–217.Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, J. I., Hirsch, W. Z., & Sonenblum, S. (1975). Crime prevention, the police production function, and budgeting. Public Finance, 30, 197–215.Google Scholar
  12. Chenery, S., Holt, J., & Pease, K. (1997). Biting back II: Reducing repeat victimisation in Huddersfield. Crime detection and prevention series paper 82. London: Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, P. J., & MacDonald, J. (2011). Public safety through private action: An economic assessment of BIDS. The Economic Journal, 121, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corsaro, N., Hunt, E. D., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. F. (2012). The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: An evaluation of the high point drug market intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deacon, R. T. (1979). The expenditure effects of alternative public supply institutions. Public Choice, 34, 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eck, J. E. (1992). Criminal investigation. In G. W. Cordner & D. C. Hale (Eds.), What works in policing? Operations and administration examined (pp. 1–52). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Finney, M. (1997). Scale economies and police department consolidation: evidence from Los Angeles. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyimah-Brempong, K. (1989). Production of public safety: Are socioeconomic characteristics of local communities important factors? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakim, S., & Rengert, G. F. (1981). Crime spillover. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Haviland, A. M., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Using group-based trajectory modeling in conjunction with propensity scores to improve balance. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hipp, J. R., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11, 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. International Association of Chiefs of Police (2011). Policing in the 21st century. Preliminary survey results. Retrieved from http://www.theiacp.org/Portals/0/pdfs/Policing_in_the_21st_Century-SURVEY_RESULTS.pdf.
  23. Jennings, A., & Esquivel, P. (2015). ‘Straight Outta’ a different Compton: City says much has changed in 25 years. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-0815-compton-image-20150815-story.html.
  24. Johnson, S. D. (2008). Repeat burglary victimisation: A tale of two theories. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennedy, D. M. (2009). Gangs and public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaFree, G. (1998). Losing legitimacy: Street crime and the decline of social institutions in America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maxson, C. L. (1999). Gang homicide: A review and extension of the literature. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 239–256). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. McCall, P. L., Land, K. C., & Parker, K. F. (2011). Heterogeneity in the rise and decline of city-level homicide rates, 1976–2005: A latent trajectory analysis. Social Science Research, 40, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehay, S. L. (1979). Intergovernmental contracting for municipal police services: An empirical analysis. Land Economics, 55, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehay, S. L., & Gonzalez, R. A. (1985). Economic incentives under contract supply of local government services. Public Choice, 46, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelligan, P. J., & Bourns, W. (2011). Municipal contracting with county sheriffs for police services in California: Comparison of cost and effectiveness. Police Quarterly, 14, 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ostrom, E. (1975). The design of institutional arrangements and the responsiveness of the police. In L. N. Rieselbach (Ed.), People vs. government: The responsiveness of American institutions (pp. 264–299). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ostrom, E. (2000). The danger of self-evident truths. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, 33–44. Retrieved from http://www.apsanet.org.Google Scholar
  38. Ostrom, E., & Parks, R. B. (1973). Suburban police departments: Too many and too small? In L. H. Masotti & J. K. Hadden (Eds.), The urbanization of the suburbs. Urban affairs annual reviews (vol. 7, pp. 367–402). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., & Whitaker, G. P. (1973). Do we really want to consolidate urban police forces? A reappraisal of some old assertions. Public Administration Review, 33, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piehl, A. M., Cooper, S. J., Braga, A. A., & Kennedy, D. M. (2003). Testing for structural breaks in the evaluation of programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/42.pdf.
  42. Sampson, R. J., & Cohen, J. (1988). Deterrent effects of the police on crime: A replication and theoretical extension. Law and Society Review, 22, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santos, R. G., & Santos, R. B. (2015). Practice-based research: Ex post facto evaluation of evidence-based police practices implemented in residential burglary micro-time hot spots. Evaluation Review, 39, 451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saunders, J., Lundberg, R., Braga, A. A., Ridgeway, G., & Miles, J. (2014). A synthetic control approach to evaluating place-based crime interventions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sides, J. (2004). Straight into Compton: American dreams, urban nightmares, and the metamorphosis of a black suburb. American Quarterly, 56, 583–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skogan, W. G. (1976). Efficiency and effectiveness in big-city police departments. Public Administration Review, 36, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, 16, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Staley, S. R. (2005). The effects of city–county consolidation: A review of the recent academic literature. Fort Wayne: Indiana Policy Review Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.inpolicy.org.Google Scholar
  49. Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47, 1265–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
  53. United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS). (2007). ICPSR31161-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Retrieved from.  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31161.v1
  54. Walzer, N. (1972). Economies of scale and municipal police services: The Illinois experience. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wellford, C., & Cronin, J. (1999). An analysis of variables affecting the clearance of homicides: A multistate study. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, J. M., & Grammich, C. A. (2012). Police consolidation, regionalization, and shared services: Options, considerations, and lessons from research and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Retrieved from https://ric-zai-inc.com/Publications/cops-w0641-pub.pdf.Google Scholar
  58. Wilson, J. M., Weiss, A., & Chermak, S. (2014). Contracting for law enforcement services: Lessons from research and practice. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 14, 34–45.Google Scholar
  59. World Heritage Encyclopedia. (2017). List of contract law enforcement cities (US). Retrieved from http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/eng/List_of_contract_law_enforcement_cities_(US).
  60. Wright, R., Logie, R. H., & Decker, S. H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations