Reluctant to embrace innocence: an experimental test of persevering culpability judgments on people’s willingness to support reintegration services for exonerees
People are hesitant to fully support reintegration efforts (e.g., opportunities to receive psychological counseling, career counseling, job training, housing assistance, educational opportunities, financial compensation) to help exonerees wrongfully convicted of a crime. However, underlying reasons motivating people’s hesitancy remain unaddressed. This research examined the influence of being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime on people’s judgments of exonerees’ culpability and willingness to support reintegration programs.
Using an experimental design, participants were randomly assigned to read a news story that depicted an African-American or White male who was exonerated after being wrongfully convicted of assault or embezzlement. Participants then offered their culpability judgments (i.e., their belief in the exoneree’s guilt and confidence in that belief) and willingness to support reintegration services.
Participants were less confident of the exoneree’s innocence and less supportive of psychological counseling services when the exoneree was a White, compared to African-American, male wrongfully convicted of the race stereotypic-consistent crime of embezzlement. An exploratory conditional mediation analysis indicated that less confidence in the exoneree’s innocence after being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime was, in turn, associated with people’s hesitancy to support psychological counseling for the exoneree.
Basic and applied implications to overcome people’s hesitancy to support reintegration efforts for exonerees are discussed.
KeywordsWrongful convictions Belief perseverance Stereotypes
This research was supported by a grant from from experiment.com (DOI: 10.18258/5182).
- Blandisi, I. M., Clow, K. A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015). Public perceptions of the stigmatization of wrongly convicted individuals: Findings from semi-structured interviews. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1881–1904.Google Scholar
- Bodenhausen, G. V., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 341–383). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 48, 267–282.Google Scholar
- Bullock, J. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Gross, S, Possley, M., & Stephens, K. (2017). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. Retrieved from National Registry of Exonerations website: https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guillford Press.Google Scholar
- Mancini, C., Mears, D. P., Stewart, E. A., Beaver, K. M., & Pickett, J. T. (2012). Whites’ perception about black criminality: A closer look at the contact hypothesis. Crime and Delinquency, 1–27.Google Scholar
- National Registry of Exonerations (2017). Retrieved April, 2017 from https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx
- Owens, M. L., & Griffiths, E. (2012). Uneven reparations for wrongful convictions: Examining the state politics of statutory compensation legislation. Albany Law Review, 75, 1283–1327.Google Scholar
- Shlosberg, A., Mandery, E., & West, V. (2012). The expungement myth. Albany Law Review, 75, 1229–1241.Google Scholar
- Thompson, A. M., Molina, O. R., & Levett, L. M. (2012). After exoneration: An investigation of stigma and wrongfully convicted persons. Albany Law Review, 75, 1373–1413.Google Scholar
- Walther, E., & Langer, T. (2010). For whom Pavlov’s bell tolls: Processes underlying evaluative conditioning? In J. P. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. D. Crano (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes and attitude change: An introductory overview (pp. 59–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2012). Life after death row. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Wihbey, J., & Kille, L. (2015). Excessive or reasonable force by police? Research on law enforcement and racial conflict. Retrieved from http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/police-reasonable-force-brutality-race-research-review-statistics