Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Advance the methodological techniques used to examine the influence of suspect race and ethnicity on participant decisions to shoot in an experimental setting.

Methods

After developing and testing a novel set of 60 realistic, high definition video deadly force scenarios based on 30 years of official data on officer-involved shootings in the United States, three separate experiments were conducted testing police (n = 36), civilian (n= 72) and military (n = 6) responses (n = 1,812) to the scenarios in high-fidelity computerized training simulators. Participants’ responses to White, Black and Hispanic suspects in potentially deadly situations were analyzed using a multi-level mixed methods strategy. Key response variables were reaction time to shoot and shooting errors.

Results

In all three experiments using a more externally valid research method than previous studies, we found that participants took longer to shoot Black suspects than White or Hispanic suspects. In addition, where errors were made, participants across experiments were more likely to shoot unarmed White suspects than unarmed Black or Hispanic suspects, and were more likely to fail to shoot armed Black suspects than armed White or Hispanic suspects. In sum, this research found that participants displayed significant bias favoring Black suspects in their decisions to shoot.

Conclusions

The results of these three experiments challenge the results of less robust experimental designs and shed additional light on the broad issue of the role that status characteristics, such as race and ethnicity, play in the criminal justice system. Future research should explore the generalizability of these findings, determine whether bias favoring Black suspects is a consequence of administrative measures (e.g., education, training, policies, and laws), and identify the cognitive processes that underlie this phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2010). Policy and training recommendations related to police use of CEDs: overview of findings from a comprehensive national study. Police Quarterly, 13(3), 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Devine, P. G. (2003). Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink response and self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 738–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., Devine, P. G., Curtin, J. J., Hartley, S. L., & Covert, A. E. (2004). Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychological Science, 15(2), 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Langan, P. (2001). Policing and Homicide, 1976–98: Justifiable Homicide by Police, Police Officers Murdered by Felons. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (February 5, 1999). “Officers in Bronx Fire 41 Shots, And an Unarmed Man Is Killed.” The New York Times.

  • Correll, J., Urland, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: the role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007a). Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2007b). Stereotypes and racial bias in the decision to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1102–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, T. (1988). Police Professionalism: The Renaissance of American Law Enforcement. Springfield, Ill.; Charles C. Thomas.

  • Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division. (2006). Violent Encounters: A Study of Felonious Assaults on Our Nation’s Law Enforcement Officers. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, J. J. (1978). Shots Fired: An Analysis of New York City Police Firearms Discharges. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.

  • Fyfe, J. J. (1982). Blind justice: police shootings in Memphis. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 702–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, J. (2000). Urban Policing in Australia and the United States, In Policing Issues, Issue #1, pp. 1–12

  • Geller, W. A. (1982). Deadly force: what we know. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. (1976). Minorities as victims of police shootings: interpretations of racial disproportionality and police use of deadly force.”. Justice System Journal, 2, 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. (1993). Individual and situational determinants of the use of deadly force: a simulation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, A. & Roland, J. (1998). “Shots Fired: Officer Involved.” The Police Chief.

  • Inn, A., Wheeler, A., & Sparling, C. (1977). The effects of suspect race and situation hazard on police officer shooting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & O’Brien, R. (1998). The determinants of deadly force: a structural analysis of police violence. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 837–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, G. R., & Pasquale-Styles, M. (2009). Firearm Deaths by Law Enforcement. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(1), 185–188 (Blackwell Publishing Limited).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. (2004). Into the Kill Zone: A Cop’s Eye View of Deadly Force. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. (2005). Social Theory and the Street Cop: The Case of Deadly Force. Ideas in American Policing, No. 7. Washington, D.C: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D., & Brunson, R. (2009). Police officers perceptual distortions during lethal force situations: informing the reasonableness standard. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobler, A. (1975). Figures (and perhaps some facts) on police killing of civilians in the United States 1965–1969. Journal of Social Issues, 31(1), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A., & Yu, J. (1992). Specifying and Testing the Threat Hypothesis: Police Use of Deadly Force. In A. E. Liska (Ed.), Social Threat and Social Control (pp. 53–68). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R.J. “No evidence Ruben Salazar was targeted in killing, report says.” Los Angeles Times, February 19, 2011.

  • MacDonald, J., Kaminski, R., Alpert, G., & Tennenbaum, A. (2001). The temporal relationship between police killings of civilians and criminal homicide: a refined version of the danger-perception theory. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1980). Police shootings of minorities: the case of Los Angeles. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K., Lambert, A. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2002). Best laid plans: effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Plant, E. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2005). The consequences of race for police officers’ responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science, 16, 180–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Peruche, B. M., & Butz, D. A. (2005). Eliminating automatic racial bias: making race non-diagnostic for responses to criminal suspects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, G. D. (1963). Justifiable homicide by police officers. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 54, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Langworthy, R. (1979). Measuring Homicide by Police Officers. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 546–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. M., & Horn, J. M. (1986). Post-Shooting Traumatic Reactions: A Pilot Study. In J. T. Reese & H. A. Goldstein (Eds.), Psychological Services for Law Enforcement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, J., Marquart, J., & Brock, D. (1993). Factors relating to killings of felons by police officers: a test of the community violence and conflict hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C., Carter, Z., Belfiore, T., Bully-Cummings, E., Daughtry, H., Farrell, M., Gascon, G., Rice, A., Rice, L. & Hewitt, D. (2010). Reducing Inherent Danger: Report of the Task Force on Police-on-police Shootings. New York State Task Force on Police-on-Police Shootings.

  • Takagi, P. (1974). A garrison state in a “democratic” society. Crime and Scholarly Justice, 1, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Policing and homicide, 1976–98: Justifiable homicide by police, police officers murdered by felons (NCJ180987). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Killed in the Line of Duty: A Study of Selected Felonious Killings of Law Enforcement Officers (Washington, DC, 1992).

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, In the Line of Fire: Violence Against Law Enforcement (Washington, DC, 1997).

  • US-House-Committee-on-the-Judiciary-Subcommittee-on-Criminal-Justice. (1989). Police Use of Deadly Force. Hearing…May 8, 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Spohn, C., DeLone, M. (2004). The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity and Crime in America. 3rd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson

  • White, M. D. (2001). Controlling police decisions to use deadly force: reexamining the importance of administrative police. Crime & Delinquency, 47(1), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. D. (2002). Identifying situational predictors of police shootings using multivariate analysis. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25(4), 726–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lois James.

Additional information

Research supported by the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (109279–001), the National Institute of Justice (2008-IJ-CX-0015), and the Office of Naval Research (DURIP#N000149810802)

Appendix A

Appendix A

Name: :

SHOT_Veh_01_N

Type: :

Vehicle stop

Difficulty: :

Naive

Synopsis: :

The vehicle contains a Black male driver, no passengers. The suspect appears intoxicated; his movements are sluggish. He appears to search for his license then slowly pulls out a handgun, points it at the officer and opens fire.

Name: :

SHOT_SusP_04_N

Type: :

Investigation of suspicious persons

Difficulty: :

Naive

Synopsis: :

A White male suspect in an empty parking lot appears to be breaking into a car with a knife. He complies with the officer commands; he puts the knife on the roof of the car. He then reaches behind his back and pulls out a wallet.

Name: :

SHOT_SusP_20_J

Type: :

Investigation of suspicious persons

Difficulty: :

Journeyman

Synopsis: :

A Black male, a White female and a White male appear to be dealing drugs on the roof of an empty warehouse. The Black male and White female take off running and the White male quickly pulls out a handgun, points it at the officer and opens fire.

Name: :

SHOT_DwelH_08_I

Type: :

Domestic disturbance

Difficulty: :

Intermediate

Synopsis: :

A White male has hold of a White female. They are both shouting and swearing. The male drags the female down a hallway and pulls out a handgun, shoots the female, then turns on the officer and opens fire.

Name: :

SHOT_DwelH_14_J

Type: :

Domestic disturbance

Difficulty: :

Journeyman

Synopsis: :

A Black male and a Black female who is holding a baby are shouting at each other. They are both at the bottom of a flight of stairs going down to the basement. The male pulls out a handgun, points it at the officer and opens fire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, L., Vila, B. & Daratha, K. Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations. J Exp Criminol 9, 189–212 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y

Keywords

Navigation