Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Non-destructive measurement of soil respiration in a grassland ecosystem using the multiple-microchambers method

  • Nobuhiko Suminokura
  • Mayuko Suzuki
  • Kenta Tanami
  • Mitsutoshi Tomotsune
  • Shinpei Yoshitake
  • Hiroshi Koizumi
Original Article

Abstract

The chamber method with plant clipping has been widely used for measuring soil respiration (SR) in grassland ecosystems. However, plant clipping may cause overestimation of SR by changing the environmental factors and injuring the plants. To solve these problems, we developed a new non-destructive method using multiple-microchambers (3 cm diameter, 8 cm height), which enables measurement of SR without plant clipping by installing chambers into gaps among the grasses. The new method was compared with the conventional method at various flow rates in vitro to assess the accuracy of SR measurement. The new method overestimated the SR rate; however, the ratio of overestimation to the conventional method was constant for each flow rate. These ratios fitted the logarithmic curve, indicating the potential for correction of the SR rate measured by the new method using the logarithmic equation. The corrected SR rate obtained by the new method was equal to the rate by the conventional method. This suggests that accurate measurement of SR in grassland ecosystems is possible using the multiple-microchambers method. We then compared the non-destructive method and the destructive method in situ on summer season and found that the destructive method overestimated SR rate in the grassland ecosystem by about 276% on average. There were two possible reasons for this overestimation; first, the clipping treatment may change environmental conditions such as soil temperature and soil water content, and second, it may directly increase plant respiration.

Keywords

Ecosystem ecology Injured respiration Non-destructive measurement Open flow method Soil respiration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. K. Kurumado and Mr. Y. Hiomo of the Takayama Field Station, Gifu University, Japan, for their technical assistance and support. Special thanks to members of Laboratory for Environmental Ecology, Waseda University, for their cooperation and constructive discussions.

References

  1. Bekku Y, Koizumi H, Oikawa T, Iwaki H (1996) Examination of four methods for measuring soil respiration. Appl Soil Ecol 5:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bliss LC (1962) Adaptations of arctic and alpine plants to environmental conditions. Arctic 15:117–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in temperate mixed hard wood forest. Glob Change Biol 4:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhital D, Yashiro Y, Ohtsuka T, Noda H, Shizu Y, Koizumi H (2010a) Carbon dynamics and budget in a Zoysia japonica grassland, central Japan. J Plant Res 123:519–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhital D, Muraoka H, Yashiro Y, Shizu Y, Koizumi H (2010b) Measurement of net ecosystem production and ecosystem respiration in a Zoysia japonica grassland, central Japan, by the chamber method. Ecol Res 25:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085–1097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang C, Moncrieff JB (1996) An improved dynamic chamber technique for measuring CO2 efflux from the surface of soil. Funct Ecol 10:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glenn E, Squiers V, Olse MN, Frye R (1993) Potential for carbon sequestration in the drylands. Water Air Soil Pollut 70:341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guoyong L, Shucun S (2011) Plant clipping may cause overestimation of soil respiration in a Tibetan alpine meadow, southwest China. Ecol Res 26:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hashimoto S (2005) Q10 values of soil respiration in Japanese forests. J For Res 10:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inoue T, Koizumi H (2012) Effects of environmental factors upon variation in soil respiration of a Zoysia japonica grassland, central Japan. Ecol Res 27:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inoue T, Nagai S, Inoue S, Ozaki M, Sakai S, Muraoka H, Koizumi H (2012) Seasonal variability of soil respiration in multiple ecosystems under the same physical–geographical environmental conditions in central Japan. For Sci Technol 8:52–60Google Scholar
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahl G, Laties GG (1989) Ethylene-induced respiration in thin slice of carrot root. J Plant Physiol 134:496–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kibe T, Mariko S (2004) Soil respiration and carbon cycle. Glob Environ 9:203–212Google Scholar
  16. Koizumi H, Kontturi M, Mariko S, Nakadai T, Bekku Y, Mela T (1999) Soil respiration in three soil types in agricultural ecosystems in Finland. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 49:65–74Google Scholar
  17. Nelson T, Edwards S, Phillip S (1973) Continuous measurement of carbon dioxide evolution from partitioned forest floor components. Ecology 54:406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norman JM, Garcia R, Verma SB (1992) Soil surface CO2 fluxes and the carbon budget of a grassland. J Geophys Res 17:18845–18853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Numata M (1969) Progressive and retrogressive gradient of grassland vegetation measured by degree of succession. Vegetation 19:96–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Numata M (1987) Temperate forests and grasslands in Japan. Shukutoku Univ Bull 21:27–44Google Scholar
  21. Ojima DS, Dirks BOM, Glenn EP, Owensby CE, Scurlock JO (1993) Assessment of C budget for grasslands and drylands of the world. Water Air Soil Pollut 70:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Passam HC, Read SJ, Rickard JE (1976) Wound repair in yam tubers: physiological processes during repair. New Phytol 77:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1982) Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298:156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pumpanen J, Ilvesniemi H, Keronen P, Nissinen A, Pohja T, Vesala T, Hari P (2001) An open chamber system for measuring soil surface CO2 efflux: analysis of error sources related to the chamber system. J Geophys Res 106:7985–7992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon-dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus Ser B Chem Phys Meteorol 44:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rochette P, Hutchinson GL (2005) Measurement of soil respiration in situ: chamber techniques. Micrometeorology agricultural systems. Agron Monogr 47:247–286Google Scholar
  27. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serrano M, Martinez D, Castillo S, Guillen F, Valero D (2004) Role of calcium and heat treatments in alleviating physiological changes induced by mechanical damage in plum. Postharvest Biol Technol 34:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang J, Baldocchi D, Xu L (2005) Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale. Glob Change Biol 11:1298–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Teramoto M, Koshiishi C, Ashihara H (2000) Wound-induced respiration and pyrophosphate: fructose-6-phosphate phosphotransferase in potato tubers. Z Naturforsch 55:9533–9956Google Scholar
  31. van Cleve K, Oechel WC, Horn JL (1990) Response of black spruce (Picea mariana) ecosystems to soil temperature modification in interior Alaska. Can J For Res 20:1530–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Loon LC, Pierpoint W, Boller T, Conejero V (1994) Recommendaions for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol Report 12:245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuhiko Suminokura
    • 1
  • Mayuko Suzuki
    • 1
  • Kenta Tanami
    • 2
  • Mitsutoshi Tomotsune
    • 3
  • Shinpei Yoshitake
    • 4
  • Hiroshi Koizumi
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Saitama Prefecture Yorii Forest OfficeOsatogunJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and SciencesWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Takayama Field Station, River Basin Research CenterGifu UniversityTakayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations