Advertisement

Data Transmission Using K-Means Clustering in Low Power Wide Area Networks with Mobile Edge Cloud

  • Dae-Young Kim
  • Seokhoon Kim
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Low-power, long-range wireless communication has become important for IoT applications in wide space. A Low-Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) has been proposed to support wireless communication. It provides very long communication distances with low data rates and uses a very simple transmission mechanism to deliver data packets over long distances. The simple transmission mechanism does not consider device characteristics according to generated data. If priority according to the device characteristics is considered during data transmission, the transmission efficiency of each service can be improved. Therefore, this paper proposes data transmission considering device characteristics. The proposed method employs a k-means clustering algorithm to classify devices according to the traffic characteristic. Each group of classified devices has different priority, and the wireless channel access time is determined by that priority. Using different channel access times according to priority allows end-devices to avoid collisions and improve transmission efficiency in LPWAN with long delay. The proposed method is compared to typical transmission methods in an LPWAN through the performance evaluation by computer simulations and its transmission efficiency is validated.

Keywords

LPWAN Priority-based data transmission k-means clustering Mobile edge cloud 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03931406), and this work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

References

  1. 1.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Elsevier Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunes, V., Peter, S., Givargis, T., & Vahid, F. (2014). A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems. KSII Transactions on Internet Information Systems, 8(12), 4242–4267.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 55(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, S., & Na, W. (2016). Safe data transmission architecture based on cloud for Internet of things. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 86(1), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, D.-Y., & Kim, S. (2017). Dual-channel medium access control of low power wide area networks considering traffic characteristics in IoE. Springer Cluster Computing—The Journal of Networks, Software Tools and Applications, 20(3), 2375–2384.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, D.-Y., & Jung, M. (2017). Data transmission and network architecture in long range low power sensor networks for IoT. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 93(1), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, M., Wan, J., & Li, F. (2012). Machine-to-machine communications: Architectures, standards and applications. KSII Transactions on Internet Information Systems, 6(2), 480–497.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goudos, S. K., Dallas, P. I., Chatziefthymiou, S., & Kyriazakos, S. (2017). A survey of IoT key enabling and future technologies: 5G, mobile IoT, sematic web and applications. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 97(2), 1645–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sornin, N., Luis, M., Eirich, T., Kramp, T., & Hersent, O. (2016). LoRaWAN specification. Lora Alliance LoRaWAN Specification, Release v1.0.2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Augustin, A., Yi, J., Clausen, T., & Townsley, W. M. (2016). A study of LoRa: Long range & low power networks for the Internet of things. MDPI Sensors, 16(9), 1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adelantado, F., Vilajosana, X., Tuset-Peiro, P., Martinez, B., Melia-Segul, J., & Watteyne, T. (2017). Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2017). Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 855–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petäjäjärvi, J., Mikhaylov, K., Pettissalo, M., Janhunen, J., & Iinatti, J. (2017). Performance of a low-power wide-area network based on LoRa technology: Doppler robustness, scalability, and coverage. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(3), 1550147717699412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Centenaro, M., Vangelista, L., Zanella, A., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(5), 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beck, M.T., Werner, M., Feld, S., & Schimper, T. (2014). Mobile edge computing: A taxonomy. In The 6th International Conference on Advances in Future Internet (AFIN) (pp. 48–54).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu, Y.C., Patel, M., Sabella, D., Sprecher, N., & Young, V. (2015). Mobile computing—a key technology towards 5G. ETSI White Paper, no. 11.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frank, H., Fuhrmann W., & Ghita, B. (2016). Mobile edge computing: Requirements for powerful mobile near real-time applications. In The 11th International Network Conference (INC) (pp. 63–66).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmed, A., Ahmed, E. (2016). A survey on mobile edge computing. In The 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marsland, S. (2014). Machine learning—An algorithmic perspective. USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrington, P. (2012). Machine learning in action. Shelter Island: Manning publications.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacDougall, M. H. (1987). Simulating computer systems—techniques and tool. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ross, S. M. (2001). Probability models for computer science. Orlando: Harcourt/Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trivedi, K. S. (2002). Probability and statistics with reliability, queuing and computer science applications. Chichester: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Technology EngineeringDaegu Catholic UniversityGyeongsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Computer Software EngineeringSoonchunhyang UniversityAsanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations