Skip to main content
Log in

Verification of Fresnel Zone Clearance for Line-of-sight Determination in 5.9 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of the path clearance is one of the most important factors for channel propagation models because most of them classify their models into line-of-sight (LOS) and non-LOS (NLOS) environments. In particular, the path for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication is more easily obstructed owing to its characteristics such as low antenna heights and high mobility. In this paper, we verify the first Fresnel zone clearance, which is a widely employed method for the determination of path clearance in V2V scenarios. In the analytical model of the first Fresnel zone in V2V scenarios, the ground acts as an obstacle and thus induces NLOS environments for farther than a certain distance. In contrast, our measurement results reveal no additional loss due to the ground obstruction. Therefore, we conclude that the first Fresnel zone calculation is not applicable for determining the path clearance in V2V scenarios, which has significant impact on the accuracy of channel propagation modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viriyasitavat, W., Boban, M., Hsin-Mu, T., & Vasilakos, A. (2015). Vehicular communications: Survey and challenges of channel and propagation models. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 10(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/mvt.2015.2410341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandra, A., Kukolev, P., Prokes, A., Mikulasek, T., & Mecklenbrauker, C. F. (2017). UWB measurements for spatial variability and ranging: Parked car in underground garage. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 16, 1859–1862. https://doi.org/10.1109/lawp.2016.2628390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spatial channel model for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) simulations, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, TR 25.996, Dec. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.3gpp.org

  4. WINNER II channel models, Eur. Commiss., IST-WINNER, Munich, Germany, Tech. Rep. D1.1.2 (2007).

  5. He, R., Molisch, A. F., Tufvesson, F., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., & Zhang, T. (2014). Vehicle-to-vehicle propagation models with large vehicle obstructions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(5), 2237–2248. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2014.2311514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boban, M., Vinhoza, T. T. V., Ferreira, M., Barros, J., & Tonguz, O. K. (2011). Impact of vehicles as obstacles in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2011.110103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boban, M., Barros, J., & Tonguz, O. K. (2014). Geometry-based vehicle-to-vehicle channel modeling for large-scale simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(9), 4146–4164. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2014.2317803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sommer, C., Joerer, S., Segata, M., Tonguz, O. K., Cigno, R. L., & Dressler, F. (2015). How shadowing hurts vehicular communications and how dynamic beaconing can help. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(7), 1411–1421. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2014.2362752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akhtar, N., Ergen, S. C., & Ozkasap, O. (2015). Vehicle mobility and communication channel models for realistic and efficient highway VANET simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(1), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2014.2319107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Segata, M., Bloessl, B., Joerer, S., Sommer, C., Gerla, M., Lo Cigno, R., et al. (2015). Toward communication strategies for platooning: Simulative and experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(12), 5411–5423. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2015.2489459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Propagation by diffraction, ITU-R, Rec. P.526-10 (2007).

  12. Rappaport, T. S. (1996). Wireless communications: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Joo, J., Han, D. S., & Jeong, H. J. (2015). First Fresnel zone analysis in vehicle-to-vehicle communications. In 2015 International conference on connected vehicles and expo (ICCVE) (pp. 196-197).

  14. Adhikari, N., Kumar, A., & Noghanian, S. (2016). Multiple antenna channel measurements for car-to-car communication. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 15, 674–677. https://doi.org/10.1109/Lawp.2015.2468221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A3B03934420) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea govenment (MOTIE) (No. P0000535, Multichannel telecommunications control unit and associated software).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Seog Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joo, J., Jeong, HJ. & Han, D.S. Verification of Fresnel Zone Clearance for Line-of-sight Determination in 5.9 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications. Wireless Pers Commun 101, 239–249 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5685-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5685-6

Keywords

Navigation