FUCEM: futuristic cooperation evaluation model using Markov process for evaluating node reliability and link stability in mobile ad hoc network


The cooperation between the nodes is one of the potential factor for successful routing in mobile ad hoc networks. The non-cooperative behaviour of the node disturbs the routing as well as degrades network performances. The non-cooperativeness is due to the resource constraint characteristics of a mobile node. The battery energy is an important constraint of a node because it exhausts after some period. On the other side, the mobility of nodes also affects routing performances. Hence, this work concentrates on evaluating cooperation of a node by probing future node energy and mobility. This paper proposes a futuristic cooperation evaluation model (FUCEM) for evaluating node reliability and link stability to establish effective routing. The FUCEM model examines influencing factors of cooperation and state transition of nodes using Markov process. Node reliability and link stability manipulated through the Markov process. The Markov process helps in fixing the upper and lower bounds of the cooperation and calculates the cooperation factor. The NS2 simulator simulates the proposed work and evaluates performance results with different scenarios. The result indicates that the proposed FUCEM has 13–21% higher packet delivery ratio than other algorithms. The remaining energy of the nodes increases to 6–7% as compared with the existing algorithms in a higher mobility scenario. Further, it significantly improves the results of routing overhead and average end-to-end delay than the existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8


  1. 1.

    Prasannavenkatesan, T., & Menakadevi, T. (2016) Significance of scalability for on-demand routing protocols in MANETs. In IEEE Proceedings conference on emerging devices and smart systems (ICEDSS2016), Namakkal, March 45 (pp. 76–82).

  2. 2.

    Prasannavenkatesan, T., Raja, R., & Ganeshkumar, P. (2014). PDA-misbehaving node detection and prevention for MANETs. In IEEE Proceedings of international conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur (pp. 1808–1812).

  3. 3.

    Shivashankar, H., Suresh, N., Golla, V., & Jayanthi, G. (2014). Designing energy routing protocol with power consumption optimization in MANET. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2, 192–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rashid, U., Waqar, O., & Kiani, A. K. (2017). Mobility and energy aware routing algorithm for mobile adhoc networks. In IEEE explore (pp. 1–5).

  5. 5.

    Samundiswary, P. (2012). Trust-based energy-aware reactive routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications,43(21), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pushpalatha, M., Venkataraman, R., & Ramarao, T. (2009). Trust-based energy-aware reliable reactive protocol in mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering,3(8), 1529–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sengathir, J., & Manoharan, R. (2015). A futuristic trust coefficient-based semi-Markov prediction model for mitigating selfish nodes in MANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 158, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jayalakshmi, V., & Razak, T. A. (2016). Trust-based power-aware secure source routing protocol using fuzzy logic for mobile ad hoc network. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science,43(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khamayseh, Y., Obiedat, G., & Yassin, M. B. (2011). Mobility and load aware routing protocol for ad hoc networks. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,23(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rango, F. D., & Guerriero, F. (2012). Link-stability and energy-aware routing protocol in distributed wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems,23(4), 713–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Manoharan, R., & Sengathir, J. (2016). Erlang coefficient based conditional probabilistic model for reliable data dissemination in MANETs. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,28(3), 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gopal, D. G., & Saravanan, R. (2015). Fuzzy-based energy-aware routing protocol with trustworthiness for MANET. International Journal of Electronics and Information Engineering,3(2), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tan, W. C., Bose, S. K., & Cheng, T. H. (2012). Power and mobility aware routing in wireless ad hoc networks. The Institution of Engineering and Technology,6(11), 1425–1437.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Macone, D., Oddi, G., & Pietrabissa, A. (2012). MQ-routing: Mobility-, GPS- and energy-aware routing protocol in MANETs for disaster relief scenarios. Ad Hoc Networks, 11, 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Prakash, J., Dutta, P., & Pal, A. (2012). Delay prediction in mobile ad hoc network using artificial neural network. Procedia Technology,4, 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yassir, A., Nasir, G. A., & Roy, P. (2013). Mobile ad hoc networks location prediction by using artificial neural networks: Considerations and future directions. International Journal Of Computer Technology and Applications,4(1), 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gite, P. (2017). Link stability prediction for mobile Ad hoc network route stability. In IEEE International conference on inventive systems and control (ICISC) (pp. 1–5).

  18. 18.

    Olalekan, A. S., & Babatunde, H. A. (2018). Link state prediction in mobile ad hoc network using Markov renewal process. International Journal of ICT and Management,7, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Palani, U., Suresh, K. C., & Nachiappan, A. (2018). Mobility prediction in mobile ad hoc networks using the eye of coverage approach. Cluster Computing, 22, 14991–14998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chaudhari, S. S., & Biradar, R. C. (2014). Resource prediction-based routing using wavelet neural network in mobile ad hoc networks. In International conference on circuits, communication, control, and computing (pp. 273–276).

  21. 21.

    Senthilkumar, R., & Manikandan, P. (2018). Enhancement of AODV protocol based on energy level in MANETs. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.,118(7), 425–430.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Manohari, D., Anandha Mala, G. S., & Anand Kumar, K. M. (2017). Fault-tolerant topology control with mobility prediction in MANETs for clinical care data transmission. Biomedical Research; Special Section: Artificial Intelligent Techniques for Bio-Medical Signal Processing. Special Issue: S36–S43.

  23. 23.

    Lai, C.-C., & Liu, C.-M. (2019). A mobility-aware approach for distributed data update on unstructured mobile P2P networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing,123, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chung, K.-C., Kuo, W.-H., & Liao, W. (2016). Delay analytical models for opportunistic routing in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,66(6), 5330–5339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wu, Y.-T., et al. (2008). Impact of node mobility on link duration in multihop mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,58(5), 2435–2442.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dixit, P., Pillai, A., & Rishi, R. (2019). A lightweight efficient cluster-based routing model for mobile ad hoc networks (LWECM). International Journal of Information Technology 1–7.

  27. 27.

    Mitra, R., & Sharma, S. (2018). Proactive data routing using controlled mobility of a mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering,70, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ma, X., Chisiu, S., Kacimi, R., & Dhaou, R. (2017). Opportunistic communications in WSN using UAV. In 2017 14th IEEE Annual consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC). IEEE.

  29. 29.

    Swidan, A., Abdelghany, H. B., Saifan, R., & Zilic, Z. (2016). Mobility and direction aware ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol. Procedia Computer Science,94, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Theerthagiri, P., & Thangavelu, M. (2019). Futuristic speed prediction using auto-regression and neural networks for mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Communication Systems,32(9), e3951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sengathir, J., & Manoharan, R. (2015). Exponential reliability coefficient based reputation mechanism for isolating selfish nodes in MANETs, Egypt. Informatics Journal,16(2), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chao, G., & Zhu, Q. (2014). An energy-aware routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks based on route energy comprehensive index. Wireless Personal Communication,79, 1557–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Theerthagiri, P. (2019). CoFEE: Context-aware futuristic energy estimation model for sensor nodes using the Markov model and autoregression. International Journal of Communication Systems, e4248.

  34. 34.

    Prasannavenkatesan, T., Rajakumar, P., & Pitchaikkannu, A. (2014). Overview of proactive routing protocols in MANET. In IEEE Proceedings of 4th international conference on communication systems & network technologies (pp. 173–177).

  35. 35.

    Yoon, J., Liu, M., & Noble, B. (2003). Random waypoint considered harmful. In IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37428) (Vol. 2). IEEE.

  36. 36.

    BonnMotion Tool. Retrieved November 17, 2017 from http://sys.cs.uos.de/bonnmotion/.

  37. 37.

    NS2 simulator. Retrieved April 30, 2017 from http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.

  38. 38.

    AWK programming script. Retrieved December 24, 2017 from https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/gawk.html.

  39. 39.

    Gopinath, S., & Nagarajan, N. (2015). Energy-based reliable multicast routing protocol for packet forwarding in MANET. Journal of Applied Research and Technology,13, 374–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, B., Chen, X., & Chang, W. (2014). A light-weight trust-based QoS routing algorithm for ad hoc networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing,13, 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Toh, C.-K. (2001). Maximum battery life routing to support ubiquitous mobile computing in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine,39(6), 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jensen, C. D., & Connell, P. O. (2006). Trust-based route selection in dynamic source routing. In International conference on trust management. Berlin: Springer.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasannavenkatesan Theerthagiri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Theerthagiri, P. FUCEM: futuristic cooperation evaluation model using Markov process for evaluating node reliability and link stability in mobile ad hoc network. Wireless Netw 26, 4173–4188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02326-y

Download citation


  • Futuristic cooperation evaluation
  • Energy-based routing
  • Reliability
  • Markov process